Learn More
Jha and the Letters Fonts Must Carry
For a script with no character encoding, the alphabet chart and the typeface are the two places the inventory lives, and they have to agree. A rare letter like Jha is a good test of both. A font that omitted it would be usable for most text and would fail without warning on the words that need it, and there would be no character standard to appeal to, because Ranjana has none: a provisional slot exists on the Unicode roadmap and proposals have been submitted, but nothing is encoded. The glyphs recorded in this atlas are vector outlines taken from an openly licensed Ranjana typeface, and the licence was checked from the font's own licence file rather than assumed, because an open licence carries obligations that travel with the work.
Two alternatives were rejected. Borrowing a Devanagari or Newa character would assert an identity between different scripts. Drawing the letters by hand would mean inventing shapes for a script that a living community still uses, which is not something an outside project should do. Recording an outline and saying plainly where it came from is the honest option, and it leaves the letters checkable by anyone who wants to compare them with the real hand. The same reasoning governs what this atlas declines to record. Where the sources do not agree on whether a shape is a letter of the script at all, the honest entry is an open question rather than a forty eighth letter, and that is how the six aspirated sonorants of Nepal Bhasa are handled here.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.