Home›Articles›The Tosafists, and What the Text Still Owes HimArticlesThe Tosafists, and What the Text Still Owes HimArticlesCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "The Tosafists, and What the Text Still Owes Him." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/rashi-the-tosafists-and-what-the-text-still-owes-him.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). The Tosafists, and What the Text Still Owes Him. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/rashi-the-tosafists-and-what-the-text-still-owes-himCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-the-tosafists-and-what-the-text-still-ow, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {The Tosafists, and What the Text Still Owes Him}, year = {2026}, url = {https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/rashi-the-tosafists-and-what-the-text-still-owes-him}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreThe Tosafists, and What the Text Still Owes Him This article records tradition as it has been passed down and reported. Its sources are not yet part of the atlas's verified catalogue.Rashi's grandsons and their own students, among them Rabbeinu Tam, built directly on his Talmud commentary to found the Tosafist school of critical glossing that dominated northern European Jewish scholarship for the next two centuries. That the school grew directly out of family and direct study lineage, rather than from an institution or a formal academy, meant Rashi's own particular reading of the text was carried forward by people who had learned it from him or from those who had, rather than transmitted at second hand through an impersonal institutional channel. There is no genuine dispute over Rashi's standing in the tradition; the live scholarly question about his work is narrower and more technical than that. Textual researchers continue to study which surviving printed and manuscript readings of the commentary trace to Rashi himself, and which were added or altered by later editors and students working within the Tosafist tradition he had started, a distinction that matters for establishing exactly what an eleventh century commentator actually wrote rather than what nine centuries of transmission and printing have attributed to him since.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnRashi, Historical Figures Well-attested Source Encyclopaedia Judaica, 2nd editionMichael Berenbaum and Fred Skolnik (eds.)tier 1SourcesEncyclopaedia Judaica, 2nd editiontier 1Michael Berenbaum and Fred Skolnik (eds.), Macmillan Reference USA, 2007View the SourceComments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year