Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Articles

Rila Monastery, a Fire and a National Revival

How a hermit's tenth century retreat became the institution Bulgarians credit with keeping their language alive under Ottoman rule

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Learn More
Rila Monastery, a Fire and a National Revival

The role Bulgarian historiography assigns to Rila Monastery during the centuries of Ottoman rule is unusual in its specificity: rather than describing a general climate of religious survival, the standard account credits the monastery's scriptorium, school and library with actively preserving Bulgarian literacy, chronicle writing and religious learning at a time when Bulgarian political institutions had ceased to exist, giving the monastery a role closer to a national archive and school combined than to an ordinary monastic house. That standing helps explain why the 1833 fire that destroyed most of the medieval monastery buildings became, rather than simply a disaster, the occasion for a rebuilding effort that drew support and donations from Bulgarian communities across the region, at a moment coinciding with the broader Bulgarian National Revival, a nineteenth century movement toward cultural and eventually political independence from Ottoman rule. The monastery rebuilt after the fire is consequently read by architectural historians on two levels at once, as a functioning Orthodox monastery and as a monument to the Revival movement itself, its striped stone and timber arcades and richly painted galleries representing a deliberate high point of Bulgarian ecclesiastical art and craftsmanship from that period. The one substantial survival from before the fire, the defensive Hrelyo Tower built in 1335 by the medieval feudal lord Hrelyo, stands today beside the nineteenth century buildings as a direct physical link to the monastery's medieval history, its plain stone mass a visible contrast to the elaborately decorated later structures around it. UNESCO's 1983 inscription recognized the complex on essentially these same two grounds, its importance to Orthodox monastic history and its status as an outstanding architectural monument of the National Revival period specifically.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Article On

Source The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised editionF. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.)
Sources
The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised edition
F. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2005View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.