Home›Articles›Nag Hammadi, and a Library in TranslationArticlesNag Hammadi, and a Library in TranslationCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "Nag Hammadi, and a Library in Translation." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/sahidic-coptic-nag-hammadi-and-a-library-in-translation.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). Nag Hammadi, and a Library in Translation. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/sahidic-coptic-nag-hammadi-and-a-library-in-translationCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-nag-hammadi-and-a-library-in-translation, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {Nag Hammadi, and a Library in Translation}, year = {2026}, url = {https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/sahidic-coptic-nag-hammadi-and-a-library-in-translation}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreNag Hammadi, and a Library in Translation The find that made Sahidic known outside Coptic studies was made in 1945 near Nag Hammadi, where a jar was opened containing thirteen leather bound codices holding some fifty texts, almost all of them previously unknown and nearly all in Sahidic. They include the Gospel of Thomas, the Gospel of Philip, the Apocryphon of John and the Gospel of Truth. Almost every one of them is a translation from Greek, so the codices preserve in Coptic a body of second and third century Christian and Gnostic literature that does not survive in its original language. Before 1945 the systems described in those texts were known chiefly from the writings of the bishops who attacked them, which is the same problem the atlas records for Canaanite religion and for a dozen other traditions. The library allowed those movements to be read in their own words for the first time. Why the codices were buried is not known. That they were found near a Pachomian monastic settlement, and that some of the bindings were stiffened with waste papyrus including monastery documents, has produced a long argument about whether monks owned them and whether they were concealed after a ruling on which books were acceptable. The atlas records that question as open.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnSahidic Coptic, Languages Well-attested Source Divinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1SourcesDivinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year