Home›Articles›Sawt, and a Sound Reconstructed as a LateralArticlesSawt, and a Sound Reconstructed as a LateralCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "Sawt, and a Sound Reconstructed as a Lateral." Accessed September 2, 2026. https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/sawt-sza-sawt-and-a-sound-reconstructed-as-a-lateral.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). Sawt, and a Sound Reconstructed as a Lateral. Retrieved September 2, 2026, from https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/sawt-sza-sawt-and-a-sound-reconstructed-as-a-lateralCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-sawt-and-a-sound-reconstructed-as-a-late, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {Sawt, and a Sound Reconstructed as a Lateral}, year = {2026}, url = {https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/sawt-sza-sawt-and-a-sound-reconstructed-as-a-lateral}, note = {Accessed September 2, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreSawt, and a Sound Reconstructed as a Lateral Sawt is the first of the two plain s letters of the fidel, and the consonant it wrote in the classical language is among the most argued-over in Semitic linguistics. Proto-Semitic is reconstructed with three separate sibilants where most of its daughters have fewer, and this letter carries the one conventionally transcribed with an acute accent, which several lines of evidence suggest was not a hissing sound at all but a lateral, made with the air escaping over the sides of the tongue. The cognate sets run as follows. Hebrew has no separate sign for it and writes it with the shin, distinguished in pointed texts by a dot on the left rather than the right. Syriac merged it likewise. Arabic keeps it distinct as shin. Ge'ez keeps it distinct as this letter. So the alphabets that preserved the three-way distinction and the alphabets that collapsed it do not line up with each other, and any statement of which Ge'ez letter answers to which Hebrew one has to say which correspondence it means. The atlas records the relation from sawt to the Hebrew shin as debated for that reason. The relation is real, but it is a relation to one of two values that the Hebrew letter carries, and stating it flatly would hide the argument rather than report it.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnSawt (Sza) ሠ, Alphabet Letters Well-attested Source Divinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1SourcesDivinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year