Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Articles

The Eye That Would Not Stop: Sekhmet and the Destruction of Mankind

Articles

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Learn More
The Eye That Would Not Stop: Sekhmet and the Destruction of Mankind

Sekhmet is the fierce lioness-headed Eye of Ra sent to punish humanity for plotting rebellion. The New Kingdom text known as the Book of the Heavenly Cow gives the episode in full and does not soften what follows. Once loosed on the plotting humans, Sekhmet does not stop when the immediate rebellion is put down; she wades through the survivors, delighting in the killing, and Ra watches his own punishment outrun his intention until he decides to spare what remains of humanity rather than let her finish. Stopping her is not simple, because she has already tasted blood and wants more of it. Ra's solution is to have a great quantity of beer dyed red with ochre spread across the field she means to cross next, so that from a distance it reads as the blood she is already hunting. She drinks it as blood, grows drunk, and falls asleep before she can resume the slaughter, waking without the killing rage that drove her, at which point the text calls the same figure Hathor rather than Sekhmet, the same transformation Hathor's own article tells from the other side. The rampage is Sekhmet's own defining act in the myth, the reason later Egyptians built entire cults, including Amenhotep III's statue program at Karnak, around appeasing her before she could begin it again.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Article On

Sources
Ancient Egyptian Literature, Volume II: The New Kingdom
Miriam Lichtheim, University of California Press, 1976The Destruction of Mankind (Book of the Heavenly Cow), Sekhmet's rampage and Ra's decision to stop her with red beerView the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.