Home›Articles›Two Creatures, One NameArticlesTwo Creatures, One NameCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "Two Creatures, One Name." Accessed August 31, 2026. https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/sphinx-two-creatures-one-name.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). Two Creatures, One Name. Retrieved August 31, 2026, from https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/sphinx-two-creatures-one-nameCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-two-creatures-one-name, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {Two Creatures, One Name}, year = {2026}, url = {https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/sphinx-two-creatures-one-name}, note = {Accessed August 31, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreTwo Creatures, One Name The Egyptian sphinx was never a single fixed form the way the Greek monster was. Alongside the familiar human-headed type of the Great Sphinx, Egyptian temples also lined processional avenues with ram-headed sphinxes, called criosphinxes by modern Egyptologists, such as the long avenue leading to the temple of Amun at Karnak, and with hawk-headed sphinxes, or hieracosphinxes, associated with Horus. Which animal head a sphinx received generally signalled which god's protective authority the image invoked, so that the human-headed royal type at Giza is only the best known member of a considerably broader Egyptian category of composite guardian figures. A persistent modern legend blames Napoleon's soldiers for shooting off the Great Sphinx's nose during target practice during his Egyptian campaign of 1798, but the damage is documented in drawings and travellers' accounts made well before Napoleon ever reached Egypt, and most Egyptologists now attribute the loss to earlier, poorly recorded deliberate vandalism, quite possibly medieval, rather than to any specific eighteenth-century incident. The story persists mainly because it offers a satisfyingly concrete villain for damage whose real cause and date are, like much else about the monument's early history, simply not well documented.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnSphinx, Mythical Creatures Well-attested Source Divinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1SourcesDivinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year