Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Articles

Older Than the Earliest Datable Point in the Lineage

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Learn More
Older Than the Earliest Datable Point in the Lineage

Even Parshvanatha, the twenty third Tirthankara and the earliest figure in the lineage that most scholars treat as potentially historical, is only tentatively placed by modern scholarship somewhere around the eighth or seventh century BCE, and that dating rests on later tradition and a small amount of corroborating circumstantial material rather than on contemporary independent record. Suparshvanatha, seventh in the sequence and therefore reckoned by Jain tradition as having lived at a point vastly more remote than even Parshvanatha, falls entirely outside any period historians have a method for testing. His placement depends wholly on the internal chronology of Jain cosmological literature, which measures time in cycles far exceeding any span archaeology or comparative textual history can address. This does not mean Jain tradition treats the dating casually.

Jain cosmology is a carefully elaborated system in its own right, describing precise, if cosmologically vast, durations for each age and each Tirthankara's place within it. It means instead that a figure like Suparshvanatha belongs to a category of religious claim, an internally consistent sacred chronology, that operates on different terms from a historical claim about a datable person, and treating the two as directly comparable is where confusion tends to arise.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Article On

Sources
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.