Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Articles

What It Was Pursued As

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Learn More
What It Was Pursued As

The Alkahest was described most influentially by Jan Baptist van Helmont, writing in the first half of the seventeenth century, as a liquid capable of reducing any material submitted to it into its own most basic, undifferentiated liquid substance, a process he distinguished sharply from ordinary dissolution, in which a solvent and a dissolved substance can generally be separated again by evaporation or other means; van Helmont's alkahest was imagined to achieve something more fundamental, a true reduction to prime matter itself. He wrote about it with apparent confidence and described some experimental results in terms that suggest he believed he had, at least on occasion, worked with a substance possessing real, if perhaps imperfect, alkahest like properties, though his descriptions are not detailed or reproducible enough for later chemists to have ever successfully replicated a genuine universal solvent from his account.

Other alchemical writers after van Helmont continued to discuss and pursue the alkahest, proposing various candidate preparations, some based on caustic alkalis, others on combinations of strong acids and salts, none of which demonstrated anything close to the universal dissolving power the concept demanded. The alkahest's pursuit continued into the eighteenth century in some quarters even as the broader chymical community increasingly moved toward the more empirical, quantitative methods that would become modern chemistry, and its gradual abandonment as a serious research goal tracks fairly closely with the wider decline of transmutational alchemy as a mainstream scientific pursuit.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Article On

Sources
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.