Home›Articles›Justinian's Bid to Settle the Three ChaptersArticlesJustinian's Bid to Settle the Three ChaptersCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "Justinian's Bid to Settle the Three Chapters." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/the-second-council-of-constantinople-justinians-bid-to-settle-the-three-chapters.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). Justinian's Bid to Settle the Three Chapters. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/the-second-council-of-constantinople-justinians-bid-to-settle-the-three-chaptersCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-justinian-s-bid-to-settle-the-three-chap, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {Justinian's Bid to Settle the Three Chapters}, year = {2026}, url = {https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/the-second-council-of-constantinople-justinians-bid-to-settle-the-three-chapters}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreJustinian's Bid to Settle the Three Chapters By the middle of the sixth century, the Christological settlement reached at Chalcedon in 451 had failed to hold the church together. Miaphysite Christians, concentrated in Egypt, Syria and Armenia, rejected Chalcedon's formula of two natures in one person as a concession to Nestorianism, the condemned teaching that divided Christ into two separate persons, divine and human. Justinian, ruling an empire that still contained large Miaphysite populations he needed to reconcile, sought a way to affirm Chalcedon while distancing it from anything that could be read as Nestorian. His solution was to condemn three specific bodies of writing, the so called Three Chapters: the person and work of Theodore of Mopsuestia, a theologian whose language on Christ's two natures Miaphysites read as crypto-Nestorian; certain polemical writings of Theodoret of Cyrus directed against Cyril of Alexandria, the Miaphysites' own theological authority; and a letter attributed to Ibas of Edessa that likewise drew Miaphysite objection. None of the three had been condemned at Chalcedon itself, so Justinian reasoned that removing them would strip away exactly the material Miaphysites found objectionable without touching Chalcedon's own decrees.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnThe Second Council of Constantinople, Councils and Synods Well-attested Source Divinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1SourcesDivinity Atlas Long-Form Articles, First Editiontier 1Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year