Home›Articles›Chaos, Combat and a God Named DesireArticlesChaos, Combat and a God Named DesireArticlesCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "Chaos, Combat and a God Named Desire." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/theogony-116-120-chaos-combat-god-named-desire.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). Chaos, Combat and a God Named Desire. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/theogony-116-120-chaos-combat-god-named-desireCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-chaos-combat-and-a-god-named-desire, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {Chaos, Combat and a God Named Desire}, year = {2026}, url = {https://www.divinityatlas.com/articles/theogony-116-120-chaos-combat-god-named-desire}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreChaos, Combat and a God Named Desire Hesiod's opening list draws two lines of comment that rarely meet. The first is structural. Nothing in these five lines fights, splits a body, or shapes a world from slain matter, which sets the passage apart from the creation accounts of Mesopotamia, where Marduk cuts Tiamat in two to make the sky, a scene this atlas also holds. Chaos, Earth, Tartarus and Eros simply come to be, one after another, with no combat and no maker named, a cosmogony built from a bare list rather than from an act. The second line of comment concerns Eros alone. Scholars have long puzzled over why desire counts among the four first things at all, since nowhere else in the poem does Eros act as an independent force the way Zeus or Aphrodite do. One reading treats him as a working cosmogonic principle, the drive that will push every later pairing of gods into offspring, and later Greek thought returned to the idea that Eros belongs among the oldest powers rather than the newest, a claim Plato has a speaker recall directly from Hesiod in the Symposium. A second reading treats Eros more modestly, as Hesiod's shorthand explanation for why a world of static first things becomes a world that generates history at all. The lines never say which reading is right, only that Eros stands beside Chaos, Earth and Tartarus at the very start.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnTheogony 116-120, Passages Well-attested Source Hesiod's CosmosJenny Strauss Claytier 1SourcesHesiod's Cosmostier 1Jenny Strauss Clay, Cambridge University Press, 2003The absence of combat in Hesiod's cosmogony and the debate over Eros's cosmogonic roleComments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year