Learn More
A Contested Toll and Two Faiths' Holy War
This article records tradition as it has been passed down and reported. Its sources are not yet part of the atlas's verified catalogue.
Historians hold no settled figure for the Third Crusade's dead; Runciman's history of the period records the campaign's individual battles and sieges, Hattin, the long siege of Acre, the fighting along the coast, without reducing them to one reconciled total, and this atlas records the toll as debated rather than adopting a single count neither side's own chroniclers agreed on.
Both sides framed the war in explicitly religious terms, and neither read it as a purely territorial dispute. Latin Christendom preached the crusade as an urgent penitential duty laid on its three greatest rulers by the loss of Jerusalem, while Saladin's own conduct of the war was described in Islamic sources of the period as jihad, the recovery of the city presented as fulfilling a religious obligation rather than pursuing a military objective alone. The 1192 truce that ended the fighting left both readings intact: Jerusalem remained under Muslim rule as Saladin's own faith required of him, while the pilgrim access Richard secured let Latin Christendom continue to treat the city as a place its own faith was owed.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.