Repeated three times, this formula is treated across Buddhist legal and ritual thought as closer to a performative act than to a statement of belief in the Christian sense: the classical Vinaya literature discusses at what point in the threefold repetition the going for refuge is considered to have legally taken effect, since a person's status as a lay Buddhist or a candidate for ordination depends on it having been performed correctly rather than merely believed sincerely. That legal, almost contractual, framing distinguishes it from most creeds in other traditions, which typically function as declarations of internal conviction rather than as acts whose completion is itself debated within a body of religious law.
The formula's canonical home, Khuddakapatha 1 in the Pali canon, situates it among the oldest strata of Buddhist scripture, and it is used with only modest variation across all three major Buddhist vehicles: Theravada practice keeps the threefold refuge essentially as given here, Mahayana ritual commonly expands the sangha refuge to include bodhisattvas alongside monastics, and some Vajrayana lineages add a fourth refuge in the guru or lama preceding the traditional three, on the reasoning that the teacher is the living channel through which the other three are actually reached. Translators disagree moderately over sarana itself, rendered refuge, protection or shelter, each choice leaning slightly differently toward passive safety or active recourse, but the larger scholarly disagreement concerns not the words but the ritual mechanics just described, when exactly a change of religious status is understood to occur.