Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Articles

What a Soft Sign Is Actually For

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Learn More
What a Soft Sign Is Actually For

The distinction between hard and soft consonants carries an enormous amount of grammatical information in the Slavic languages, and a writing system has to record it somehow. There are only two ways: mark the consonant, or mark the vowel that follows it.

Cyrillic chose the second, and the choice is visible throughout the alphabet. Slavonic wrote a glide plus a vowel with its own letters, the iotified series, and the modern alphabets continue the principle with vowel letters that do double duty, saying both which vowel is present and whether the consonant in front of it is soft. On that system the reader learns the consonant quality by looking one letter ahead.

The system has a gap. A soft consonant at the end of a word, or in front of another consonant, has no following vowel to carry the information, and there the front jer steps in. Modern Russian orthography is exactly this: vowel letters do the work where a vowel follows, and the soft sign does it where none does.

That is a tidy solution to a real problem, and it was not designed. It is the accidental outcome of a vowel falling silent and leaving its side effect behind, and it happened to land on a script whose vowel letters were already carrying consonant information for unrelated reasons.

The alternative approach, marking the consonants themselves with diacritics, is what the Latin based Slavic orthographies do, and comparing a Czech page with a Russian one shows two entirely different answers to one question.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Article On

Sources
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.