Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Beliefs & Restrictions

A Muslim Who Commits a Grave Sin Ceases to Be a Believer

Core Tenets

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The Kharijite position held that grave sin puts a person outside the community of belief, with the consequences for allegiance and for legitimate rule that follow from it. It is the first great question of Islamic theology and every later school defined itself against it: the Murjia deferred judgement to God, the Mutazila placed the grave sinner in an intermediate station, and the emerging Sunni consensus held that sin does not by itself unmake a believer.

Facts
Scholarship and Forensics
Scholarly Note
It is the first great question of Islamic theology and every later school defined itself against it: the Murjia deferred judgement to God, the Mutazila placed the grave sinner in an intermediate station, and the emerging Sunni consensus held that sin does not by itself unmake a believer. 1
Origins
Held By
The Kharijites, with the consequences for allegiance and for legitimate rule that follow from it. 1
Belief
Subject
Community and its boundaries 1
Status
Status Within the Tradition
Rejected, or not held, within this tradition 1Tradition: Sunni
Learn More
The Doctrine's Origin at Siffin

The Kharijite position on grave sin grew directly out of the Battle of Siffin in 657, fought between Ali, the fourth caliph, and Muawiya, the governor of Syria who contested his succession. When Ali agreed to settle the dispute by arbitration rather than continued fighting, a faction within his own army rejected the agreement outright, holding that judgment belonged to God alone and that Ali had sinned gravely by submitting a matter of right rule to human arbitrators. From that founding grievance the group, who took the name Kharijites, those who go out, from their withdrawal from Ali's camp, drew a wider theological conclusion: that grave sin of any kind puts the person who commits it outside the community of belief entirely, stripping a wrongdoer, ruler or otherwise, of any claim to be a believer at all. The Venture of Islam traces how this reasoning made the Kharijite position inseparable from a political one, since a ruler who governed unjustly had, on this account, ceased to be Muslim and so could rightly be resisted and even killed, a conclusion later Kharijite factions carried into repeated armed uprisings against Umayyad governors and, at the doctrine's origin, against Ali himself, whom a Kharijite assassin killed in 661 for having accepted the arbitration the group had condemned.

How Later Schools Defined Themselves Against It

The Kharijite verdict on grave sin became, in the assessment of historians of Islamic theology, the first great doctrinal question the young Muslim community had to answer, and nearly every subsequent theological school took shape partly in reaction to it. The Murjia answered by refusing the Kharijite claim to judge at all, holding that the true state of a sinner's faith could not be known by other believers and had to be deferred, or postponed, to God's judgment alone, a position whose very name, the postponers, marks it as a direct reply. The Mutazila, working out a more systematic middle position, held that a Muslim who commits a grave sin without repenting occupies neither full belief nor outright unbelief but an intermediate station of its own, a formal category the Encyclopaedia of Islam credits as one of the school's foundational doctrines. The emerging Sunni consensus settled on a third answer, that sin, however grave, does not by itself remove a person from the community of believers, leaving judgment of a sinner's ultimate standing to God in the next life. The Kharijite movement itself splintered further under the pressure of its own logic, producing the extreme Azariqa, who extended the verdict of unbelief even to fellow Muslims who declined to fight alongside them, and the more moderate Ibadis, whose descendants in Oman today explicitly reject the Kharijite label while preserving elements of its early theology.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Belongs to Tradition

Sources
1. Islamic Creeds: A Selection
W. Montgomery Watt, Edinburgh University Press, 1994View the Source
God's Rule: Government and Islam. Six Centuries of Medieval Islamic Political Thought
Patricia Crone, Columbia University Press, 2004
The Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd edition
P. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, C. E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel and W. P. Heinrichs (eds.), Brill, 2005View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.