Ashari theology affirms that God's knowledge, power, life and speech are real attributes and not merely names for His essence, while refusing to make them separate eternal things. The formula that they are neither He nor other than He is deliberate: it holds the middle between the Mutazili denial of distinct attributes and a plurality of eternals that would compromise the divine oneness.
Facts
Scholarship and Forensics
Scholarly NoteThe formula is deliberate. It holds the middle between the Mutazili denial of distinct attributes and a plurality of eternals that would compromise the divine oneness. 1 Origins
Held ByAshari theology, and through it most of the Sunni world. 1 Belief
SubjectThe nature of the divine 1 Status
Status Within the TraditionBinding, without a formal definition 1Tradition: Sunni Learn More
Real, yet Neither Identical to God nor Separate From Him
Ashari theology affirms that God's knowledge, power, life and speech are real attributes rather than empty names for a single undivided essence, while at the same time refusing to treat them as separate eternal things existing alongside God's essence, a formula stated as neither He nor other than He. Islamic Creeds: A Selection presents the wording as a deliberate compromise position, holding a middle course between the Mutazili theologians, who denied that God possesses attributes distinct from His essence at all, treating talk of divine attributes as merely figurative, and a position the Asharis judged to compromise divine oneness by multiplying eternal realities alongside God. The Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd edition records that this formula became, through the Ashari school's wide adoption across the Sunni world, one of the most consequential settlements in the history of Islamic theology, since it allowed scripture's frequent references to God's knowing, willing and speaking to be read as straightforwardly true statements rather than as metaphor requiring reinterpretation, without conceding the philosophical difficulties the Mutazila had raised against a crude multiplication of divine eternals.
Al-Ashari's Break and a Settlement After the Mihna
The Ashari position on divine attributes traces to Abu al-Hasan al-Ashari, who trained within Mutazili theology before breaking from it and developing a rival system that retained some of Mutazili logical rigour while rejecting its central conclusions about the divine attributes and the createdness of the Quran. The Venture of Islam, Volume 1: The Classical Age of Islam situates this break within the aftermath of the mihna, the inquisition imposed under Abbasid patronage of Mutazili doctrine in the ninth century, a period whose eventual collapse left Sunni theology searching for a settlement capable of affirming scripture's plain sense against Mutazili rationalism without abandoning reasoned argument altogether. The Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd edition records that Ashari theology, developed in the generations following that search, went on to become the dominant theological school across most of the Sunni world, its formula on the divine attributes carried into standard creeds and taught in Sunni institutions long after the specific ninth century controversy that produced it had receded from active memory, so that a position born from one historical crisis became the ordinary theological common sense of later centuries.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.