The rejection of sama is held by the Naqshbandi order among the Sufi orders themselves, and far more broadly by Salafi and Wahhabi currents, which extend it into a general prohibition on music in worship. The Naqshbandi objection is one of method within the path; the Salafi objection is that the practice is an innovation with no warrant in the first generations.
Facts
Scholarship and Forensics
Scholarly NoteThe two objections are not the same. The Naqshbandi objection is one of method within the path; the Salafi objection is that the practice is an innovation with no warrant in the first generations. 2 Origins
Held ByThe Naqshbandi order among the Sufi orders themselves, and far more broadly by Salafi and Wahhabi currents, which extend it into a general prohibition on music in worship. 1 Status
Status Within the TraditionGenuinely disputed within the tradition 1Tradition: Sufism Learn More
The Naqshbandi Case for Silence
Sufi orders differ sharply over whether sound and music belong in the path to God, and the Naqshbandi order stands at the far end from the whirling and singing traditions like the Mevlevi and Chishti. Naqshbandi practice is built around dhikr i khafi, silent remembrance performed inwardly rather than aloud, a method its adherents trace to the Prophet Muhammad and the first caliph, Abu Bakr, and ground in a Quranic instruction to remember God inwardly, with humility, and without raising the voice. Baha al Din Naqshband, the fourteenth century founder the order takes its name from, is reported to have preferred silent dhikr specifically because its subtlety let it penetrate the heart more deeply than anything spoken or sung aloud could. On this reasoning the objection to sama, the musical audition practiced by other Sufi orders, is a claim about method within the same broader path rather than a claim that music itself is forbidden by Islamic law: the order is not arguing sama is impermissible for everyone, only that it is the wrong tool for the specific discipline it teaches, which favors restraint, discretion and interior stillness over the ecstatic states music and movement can produce. That distinction separates the Naqshbandi position from the far broader prohibition later Wahhabi and Salafi currents would build on different grounds entirely.
An Innovation Rather Than a Wrong Method
Where the Naqshbandi order objects to music as the wrong method for its own path, Wahhabi and Salafi currents object to musical devotion on an entirely different basis, one that reaches Sufi orders and non Sufi Muslims alike. Their reasoning follows the same bidah framework that leads them to reject shrine visitation and the mawlid: since the Prophet and his earliest companions are not recorded practicing devotional music or dance as worship, introducing either now counts as an innovation with no warrant in the first generations, whatever spiritual benefit its practitioners report from it. That argument extends well past the specific ecstatic forms, such as the Mevlevi whirling ceremony or Chishti qawwali singing, that some Sufi orders built entire devotional traditions around, toward a general suspicion of music in religious life some Wahhabi authorities have applied even outside explicitly devotional contexts. The two objections can look similar from the outside since both conclude that music has no place on the path, but they rest on different arguments and would not necessarily agree with each other's reasoning: a Naqshbandi teacher rejects sama as unsuited to a particular contemplative method still open to other paths, while a Salafi scholar rejects it as illegitimate religious innovation, a verdict that, on his own premises, extends to devotional music practiced anywhere in Islam, Sufi or not.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.