The Sri Vaishnava tradition, which takes its name from her, holds that Sri, the goddess Lakshmi, mediates between the soul and Vishnu: she is worshipped as inseparable from him and as the one through whom the soul approaches him, so the divine is addressed as a pair rather than as a single figure. How far her mediation is itself a means of salvation, and whether she is a soul of a special kind or divine in the same sense as Vishnu, are questions that divide the tradition's own schools and remain unresolved between them.
Facts
Disputed
Point in DisputeHow far her mediation is itself a means of salvation, and whether she is a soul of a special kind or is divine in the same sense as Vishnu, are among the questions on which the two Sri Vaishnava schools divide. 2 In Sri Vaishnava theology, Lakshmi, called Sri, is worshipped as inseparable from Vishnu and as the one through whom the soul approaches him, so that the divine is addressed as a pair rather than as a single figure; the tradition takes its own name from her title. Patricia Mumme's study of the historical dispute between the Sri Vaishnava teachers Manavalamamuni and Vedanta Desika, which produced the tradition's later division into the Vadakalai and Tenkalai schools, records that the two schools disagree over how far her mediation itself functions as a means of salvation and over whether she is a soul of an exceptional kind, closer to human souls though supreme among them, or divine in the same sense Vishnu is divine. The dispute reaches back to the medieval theological argument between the two named teachers and has not converged since, because it concerns Lakshmi's precise ontological status, a question the tradition's shared scriptures address only implicitly enough to support both readings among the same body of texts. Status
Status Within the TraditionBinding, without a formal definition 1Tradition: Sri Vaishnavism Scholarship and Forensics
Scholarly NoteLakshmi is worshipped as inseparable from Vishnu and as the one through whom the soul approaches him, so that the divine is addressed as a pair rather than as a single figure. 1 Belief
SubjectThe nature of the divine 1 Origins
Held ByThe Sri Vaishnava tradition, which takes its name from her. 1 Learn More
Sri as the Mediatrix Between the Soul and Vishnu
The Sri Vaishnava tradition takes its own name from Sri, the goddess Lakshmi, whom it holds as eternally and inseparably united with Vishnu rather than as a separate deity who happens to accompany him. The Theology of Ramanuja describes Sri and Narayana, another name for Vishnu, as addressed together as a single divine pair, so that approaching one without the other is, in the tradition's own terms, not a coherent option for a worshipper. Her distinctive theological role is purushakara, mediation or intercession: the soul's act of surrender, prapatti, to Vishnu is understood to proceed through her, and her presence is described as softening Vishnu's justice with a mercy of her own, the way a queen might intercede with a king on behalf of a petitioner who could not otherwise approach him directly. This mediating role gives Sri a functional importance in the tradition's soteriology that goes well beyond that of a consort figure in most other Vaishnava schools, since without her intercession the tradition's account of how surrender actually reaches Vishnu would be missing a necessary step. Sri Vaishnava temple iconography makes the pairing visually explicit, showing her seated permanently on Vishnu's chest as Sridevi, a placement the tradition reads as making his very heart the seat of the compassion she supplies to soften his judgment of the soul who approaches him.
A Question That Divides the Vadakalai and Tenkalai Schools
Exactly how far Sri's mediation goes is one of the questions on which the Sri Vaishnava tradition's own two schools divide, a dispute John Carman's study traces to differing readings of what her intercession requires from the soul. The Vadakalai school, following Vedanta Desika, holds that Sri's mediation, while genuinely effective, still leaves the soul's own effort a necessary part of surrender, illustrated by the markata nyaya, the logic of the monkey, whose infant must actively cling to its mother's body as she carries it. The Tenkalai school, following Manavala Mamuni and the earlier teacher Pillai Lokacharya, holds prapatti as accomplished entirely through Sri and Vishnu's own grace with no effort required of the soul at all, illustrated by the marjara nyaya, the logic of the cat, whose kitten is carried passively in its mother's mouth. Bound up with this same disagreement is the further question, unresolved between the schools, of whether Sri is herself divine in the same sense Vishnu is or a soul of an exceptionally exalted kind, since the two positions imply different accounts of how her mediation could work without either compromising Vishnu's supremacy or reducing her intercession to a merely symbolic role.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.