A mandala inscribed in characters rather than painted in figures is set as the focus of practice, with the title of the Lotus Sutra down the centre and the assembly of the sutra ranged around it. Chanting is done facing it, and the tradition holds that the life of the practitioner and the mandala are not two things, so that what is venerated is also what is being disclosed. Which inscriptions are authoritative, and who may confer them, has been the substance of the sharpest disputes among Nichiren's successors.
Facts
Disputed
Status Within the TraditionGenuinely disputed within the tradition 1 Because the Gohonzon is held to be inseparable from the life of the practitioner who venerates it, which inscribed mandala is treated as an authentic transmission, and which institution or teacher holds the authority to confer one, are not peripheral administrative questions within the Nichiren traditions but bear directly on the practice's own claimed efficacy. The Writings of Nichiren, transmitted across three to four hundred letters and treatises of which some are of disputed attribution, do not by themselves resolve competing lineages' claims to conferral authority, since a lineage can appeal to a letter whose own authenticity is contested by a rival lineage. This is why the status of these claims within the tradition remains genuinely disputed among Nichiren's successor schools rather than settled by appeal to a single agreed textual authority: the source texts available to settle the question are themselves partly the object of the same kind of authenticity dispute. Point in DisputeWhich inscriptions are authoritative, and who may confer them. It has been the substance of the sharpest disputes among the successors of Nichiren. 1 The Gohonzon, a mandala inscribed in characters rather than painted in figures, with the title of the Lotus Sutra down its centre and the assembly of the sutra ranged around it, is set as the object of practice in the Nichiren traditions, which hold that the life of the practitioner and the mandala are not two separate things, so that what is venerated in chanting before it is also what is being disclosed within the practitioner. The Writings of Nichiren, three to four hundred letters and treatises across his working life, some of disputed attribution, are the source from which competing successor lineages each claim authority to determine which inscribed Gohonzon are authentic transmissions of Nichiren's own intent and which persons or institutions hold the authority to confer a new one on a practitioner. This question, over authenticity and authority to confer, has been the substance of the sharpest disputes among Nichiren's successor schools, disputes made sharper by the disputed attribution of some of the source writings themselves, since a lineage's claim to authority can rest on a letter whose authenticity is not itself settled. Belief
Category of Belief Origins
Held ByThe Nichiren traditions. 1 Learn More
A Mandala Inscribed on Sado Island
Nichiren inscribed the first Gohonzon while in exile on Sado Island in 1271, following his conviction for treason for his public criticism of the Kamakura shogunate's tolerance of what he held to be false teachings. The object he produced is not a painted image but a mandala rendered entirely in written characters, with the daimoku, Nam Myoho Renge Kyo, running down its center and the names of buddhas, bodhisattvas and protective deities arranged around it in a specific configuration. Nichiren drew the design from a scene in the Lotus Sutra's Treasure Tower chapter, sometimes called the Ceremony in the Air, in which the historical Buddha and an ancient buddha named Many Treasures sit together inside a floating jeweled tower while the sutra's assembly gathers around them; the Gohonzon renders that scene in text rather than in figures, with the practitioner understood to be entering the same assembly by chanting before it. Nichiren went on to inscribe well over a hundred Gohonzon during his lifetime for different followers and temples, a number scholarship has been able to establish because a substantial share of his own hand written originals survive and remain held across various Nichiren temples today.
Whose Inscription Is the True One
Because Nichiren inscribed many Gohonzon himself and his teaching then split into several distinct schools after his death, more than one Nichiren tradition today holds its own transmitted Gohonzon as the authoritative one, and the schools do not agree with each other about which inscription that is. Several head temples associated with the schools descending from Nichiren's original senior disciples each maintain their own lineage of transmitted Gohonzon, typically traced to a specific original Nichiren inscribed for that particular temple or disciple, so the object a practitioner chants before differs by institutional affiliation even though every version follows the same basic design. Nichiren Shoshu presses a stronger claim than a shared design merely traced to different originals: it holds a single Gohonzon inscribed by Nichiren himself, the Dai Gohonzon kept at its head temple, to be the one true object meant for all humanity rather than one transmission among others of equal standing, a claim other Nichiren schools do not accept on their own account. Underneath the institutional dispute sits a genuine doctrinal question the schools answer differently: whether the authority of a Gohonzon rests in the specific physical object and its documented lineage, or in the practitioner's own buddha nature that the object serves only to disclose.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.