Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme

Divinity Atlas

Disputed Statements

Claims this atlas currently marks as unsettled or as tested and found false. A debated fact is one scholars hold competing positions on; a debunked one has been checked against the record and found not to hold. Both are kept in view rather than quietly smoothed over, with the reasoning that put each one where it stands.

3,862 statements.

The Eleusinian Mysteries, Origin Period Start Year-700

The Eleusinian Mysteries, Religions

Standing

Concerns Origin Period Start Year

Currently States -700

Archaeology places cult activity at the Eleusis sanctuary as far back as the Mycenaean period, but nothing ties that Bronze Age activity to the historical Mysteries of Demeter and Persephone with any certainty. The earliest secure literary attestation is the Homeric Hymn to Demeter, usually dated to the seventh century BCE, and that later date is the anchor the standard scholarship actually argues from. The cult ended when Alaric's Goths destroyed the sanctuary in 396 CE.

Source Greek Religion, Walter Burkert

The Elizabethan Persecution of Catholics, Death Toll Minimum150.000000

The Elizabethan Persecution of Catholics, Religious Events

Standing

Concerns Death Toll Minimum

Currently States 150.000000

The Catholic Encyclopedia's Penal Laws entry gives "over 150 Catholics" who died on the scaffold specifically under the 1585 Act against Jesuits and Seminary Priests, counted from 1581 to 1603 and stated as exclusive of anyone executed earlier in Elizabeth's reign. This is the narrower of the two figures given for this persecution: it counts only deaths tied to that one statute's treason provision, while the wider death-toll-max figure below draws on a longer 1577 to 1603 window with a broader inclusion basis, which is why the two are kept as a range rather than merged.

Source Catholic Encyclopedia, "Penal Laws" (New Advent), Catholic Encyclopedia editorial staff (1907 to 1912 edition)

The Elizabethan Persecution of Catholics, Death Toll Maximum183.000000

The Elizabethan Persecution of Catholics, Religious Events

Standing

Concerns Death Toll Maximum

Currently States 183.000000

An independently reported count of 183 English Catholics put to death across the wider 1577 to 1603 span, a broader window and inclusion basis than the Penal Laws entry's own narrower 1581 to 1603 figure above; the two are kept as a range rather than collapsed into a single number neither source itself gives.

Source Catholic Encyclopedia, "Penal Laws" (New Advent), Catholic Encyclopedia editorial staff (1907 to 1912 edition)

The Empedoclean Cosmic Cycle, Proposed DatingThe stage of Strife's separation in which limbs and organs are said to wander alone and join at random, so that only the combinations able to survive persist, has drawn comparison to natural selection.

The Empedoclean Cosmic Cycle, Ages

Standing

Concerns Proposed Dating

Currently States The stage of Strife's separation in which limbs and organs are said to wander alone and join at random, so that only the combinations able to survive persist, has drawn comparison to natural selection.

Some modern commentators read the passage, in which viable random combinations of limbs and organs alone survive to form the animals and people of the present world, as an early anticipation of natural selection; others judge the resemblance superficial, since Empedocles describes a single cosmogonic episode within the eternal cycle rather than an ongoing process of selection repeated across generations.

Source Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman (eds.)

The Enlightenment of the Buddha, HistoricityA long chronology places the Buddha's death, and so the enlightenment some decades earlier, around 483 BCE; a revised short chronology argued at a 1988 symposium of specialists places his death closer to 400 BCE.

The Enlightenment of the Buddha, Religious Events

Standing

Concerns Historicity

Currently States A long chronology places the Buddha's death, and so the enlightenment some decades earlier, around 483 BCE; a revised short chronology argued at a 1988 symposium of specialists places his death closer to 400 BCE.

This note previously read 486 BCE while citing Encyclopaedia Britannica, which itself states the long chronology as about 563 to 483 BCE, confirmed by reading Britannica's own Buddha entry directly. Corrected to match its own cited source.

Source Encyclopaedia Britannica (online academic reference), Encyclopaedia Britannica editors

The Enlightenment of the Buddha, When It HappenedTraditionally observed on the full moon of the month of Vaisakha (the basis of Vesak); the historical year is not independently fixed, with scholarly estimates ranging across the sixth to fifth century BCE depending on which chronology of the Buddha's life is followed.

The Enlightenment of the Buddha, Religious Events

Standing

Concerns When It Happened

Currently States Traditionally observed on the full moon of the month of Vaisakha (the basis of Vesak); the historical year is not independently fixed, with scholarly estimates ranging across the sixth to fifth century BCE depending on which chronology of the Buddha's life is followed.

According To Encyclopaedia Britannica

Traditional long chronologies and the revised "corrected long chronology" used by many modern historians disagree by roughly a century on the Buddha's dates, so no single calendar year for the enlightenment itself is treated as settled.

Source Encyclopaedia Britannica (online academic reference), Encyclopaedia Britannica editors

The Epiclesis, Scholarly NoteWhere in the prayer the consecration takes place divided Greek and Latin theologians from the fourteenth century

The Epiclesis, Rituals

Standing

Concerns Scholarly Note

Currently States Where in the prayer the consecration takes place divided Greek and Latin theologians from the fourteenth century

The epiclesis, the invocation of the Holy Spirit within the eucharistic prayer, sits at the centre of a long-standing East-West disagreement over exactly when and how the bread and wine become the body and blood of Christ. John Meyendorff's Byzantine Theology: Historical Trends and Doctrinal Themes (1979) sets out the Greek position, that the invocation of the Spirit is the moment at which the church asks for and receives the consecration, so that a formula understood to act automatically without that asking would make the priest an independent operator rather than a petitioner of God. The Latin position instead holds that Christ's own words of institution carry an unconditional promise sufficient in themselves, so praying afterward for a change already accomplished is theologically incoherent. Meyendorff's method is historical and doctrinal, tracing each position to its own patristic and scholastic sources. Modern liturgical scholarship in both communions increasingly treats the whole eucharistic prayer as consecratory in its entirety, reading the search for one precise instant of change as a scholastic question the earliest texts never set out to answer, a third position rather than a resolution.

Source Byzantine Theology: Historical Trends and Doctrinal Themes, John Meyendorff

The European Witch Trials, Estimated ExecutionsTens of thousands of executions over roughly three centuries. The atlas asserts no total: see the linked study for the range, the disagreement behind it, and the refutation of the nine million figure.

The European Witch Trials, Religious Events

Standing

Concerns Estimated Executions

Currently States Tens of thousands of executions over roughly three centuries. The atlas asserts no total: see the linked study for the range, the disagreement behind it, and the refutation of the nine million figure.

The range is contested on methodological grounds, chiefly how far to extrapolate across jurisdictions whose records are lost. Any single figure quoted without a margin and without a stated basis should be treated as unsourced.

Source Witches and Witch-Hunts: A Global History, Wolfgang Behringer

The Exodus, HistoricityIsrael Finkelstein and Neil Asher Silberman's The Bible Unearthed (Free Press, 2001) argues from the archaeological record of Egypt and the Sinai that no material trace supports a mass Israelite departure or a forty year wilderness sojourn on the scale Exodus describes, a minimalist reading the authors set against scholars including James Hoffmeier, who argue that Egyptian-period details embedded in the narrative point to a historical core surviving inside a text whose scale is not literal; the size and reality of any underlying exodus remains disputed.

The Exodus, Religious Events

Standing

Concerns Historicity

Currently States Israel Finkelstein and Neil Asher Silberman's The Bible Unearthed (Free Press, 2001) argues from the archaeological record of Egypt and the Sinai that no material trace supports a mass Israelite departure or a forty year wilderness sojourn on the scale Exodus describes, a minimalist reading the authors set against scholars including James Hoffmeier, who argue that Egyptian-period details embedded in the narrative point to a historical core surviving inside a text whose scale is not literal; the size and reality of any underlying exodus remains disputed.

Source Israel Finkelstein and Neil Asher Silberman, The Bible Unearthed, Israel Finkelstein, Neil Asher Silberman

The Exodus, HistoricityJames K. Hoffmeier argues that Egyptian period details embedded in the narrative, including place names and attested Semitic settlement in the eastern Nile Delta, support a historical core even if the biblical scale is not literal.

The Exodus, Religious Events

Standing

Concerns Historicity

Currently States James K. Hoffmeier argues that Egyptian period details embedded in the narrative, including place names and attested Semitic settlement in the eastern Nile Delta, support a historical core even if the biblical scale is not literal.

Source James K. Hoffmeier, Israel in Egypt: The Evidence for the Authenticity of the Exodus Tradition, James K. Hoffmeier

The Exodus, When It HappenedNo independently attested date exists; biblical chronology suggests either an early date around the fifteenth century BCE or a late date around the thirteenth century BCE associated with Ramesses II, and mainstream biblical archaeology finds no Egyptian or archaeological record corroborating an exodus of the scale the text describes at either date.

The Exodus, Religious Events

Standing

Concerns When It Happened

Currently States No independently attested date exists; biblical chronology suggests either an early date around the fifteenth century BCE or a late date around the thirteenth century BCE associated with Ramesses II, and mainstream biblical archaeology finds no Egyptian or archaeological record corroborating an exodus of the scale the text describes at either date.

According To The Bible Unearthed

The Bible Unearthed argues the archaeological record does not support a large-scale exodus and conquest at either proposed date, while Israel in Egypt argues for a historical core behind the narrative; the dating itself remains unresolved between these positions.

Source Israel Finkelstein and Neil Asher Silberman, The Bible Unearthed, Israel Finkelstein, Neil Asher Silberman

The Expulsion of the Jews from Spain, Displaced (Low Estimate)40000.000000

The Expulsion of the Jews from Spain, Religious Events

Standing

Concerns Displaced (Low Estimate)

Currently States 40000.000000

Historians' estimates of the number who left rather than convert range considerably, from the tens of thousands to figures several times higher in older, less rigorous accounts; this reflects the lower end modern scholarship favors.

Source Encyclopaedia Judaica, 2nd edition, Michael Berenbaum and Fred Skolnik (eds.)

The Expulsion of the Jews from Spain, Displaced (High Estimate)100000.000000

The Expulsion of the Jews from Spain, Religious Events

Standing

Concerns Displaced (High Estimate)

Currently States 100000.000000

A commonly cited upper bound in general accounts; older polemical figures ran considerably higher still and are not treated as reliable.

Source Encyclopaedia Judaica, 2nd edition, Michael Berenbaum and Fred Skolnik (eds.)

The Expulsion of the Moriscos from Spain, Displaced (Low Estimate)275000.000000

The Expulsion of the Moriscos from Spain, Religious Events

Standing

Concerns Displaced (Low Estimate)

Currently States 275000.000000

Historians' estimates of Moriscos expelled range considerably; this reflects the lower end of figures modern scholarship favors, with some estimates running higher.

Source Blood and Faith: The Purging of Muslim Spain, 1492-1614, Matthew Carr

The Expulsion of the Moriscos from Spain, Displaced (High Estimate)300000.000000

The Expulsion of the Moriscos from Spain, Religious Events

Standing

Concerns Displaced (High Estimate)

Currently States 300000.000000

The commonly cited upper bound in general accounts of the expulsion; a small minority of estimates run higher still.

Source Blood and Faith: The Purging of Muslim Spain, 1492-1614, Matthew Carr

The Expulsion of the Moriscos from Spain, Death Toll Minimum110000.000000

The Expulsion of the Moriscos from Spain, Religious Events

Standing

Concerns Death Toll Minimum

Currently States 110000.000000

The contemporary chronicler Pedro Aznar Cardona's own 1612 figure: over 50,000 Moriscos killed resisting expulsion inside Spain between October 1609 and July 1611, plus over 60,000 more dying during passage abroad by land or sea, roughly 110,000 total, about 17 percent of the Morisco population as reported in Majid (2009). This is Aznar Cardona's own stated absolute count, near-contemporary to the events, not a figure derived by this atlas.

Source Majid, Anouar, "We Are All Moors: Ending Centuries of Crusades against Muslims and Other Minorities" (2009), Anouar Majid

The Expulsion of the Moriscos from Spain, Death Toll Maximum225000.000000

The Expulsion of the Moriscos from Spain, Religious Events

Standing

Concerns Death Toll Maximum

Currently States 225000.000000

Henry Charles Lea's 1901 claim of a 67 to 75 percent Morisco death rate, which Majid's own 2009 chapter explicitly calls "difficult to verify," the same maximalist role Lea plays elsewhere in this database (his estimate of the 1391 Massacres death toll, likewise flagged as later regarded as inflated). Lea states a rate rather than an absolute count; the figure here applies his own upper rate, 75 percent, to the entity's already-recorded upper displaced total of 300,000, yielding 225,000. This is disclosed as a computed application of Lea's own cited rate to a total already recorded here, offered as the outlier upper pole against Aznar Cardona's grounded contemporary figure, not as Lea's own quoted absolute number.

Source Majid, Anouar, "We Are All Moors: Ending Centuries of Crusades against Muslims and Other Minorities" (2009), Anouar Majid

The Falling of the Amrita at the Four Tirthas, HistoricityThe specific tradition connecting the Samudra Manthan narrative to these four particular sites developed later than the core churning narrative itself; scholars studying the Kumbh Mela's history note that its association with all four sites in its present form is a comparatively later development.

The Falling of the Amrita at the Four Tirthas, Religious Events

Standing

Concerns Historicity

Currently States The specific tradition connecting the Samudra Manthan narrative to these four particular sites developed later than the core churning narrative itself; scholars studying the Kumbh Mela's history note that its association with all four sites in its present form is a comparatively later development.

Source Pilgrimage and Power: The Kumbh Mela in Allahabad, 1765-1954, Kama Maclean

The Farhud (1941), Death Toll Minimum130.000000

The Farhud (1941), Wars & Conflicts

Standing

Concerns Death Toll Minimum

Currently States 130.000000

The Iraqi government's own Commission of Inquiry, convened after the violence, put the combined Jewish and Muslim dead at about one hundred thirty; this is that official floor, an officially compiled operational count rather than an independent citywide reconstruction.

Source United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, "The Farhud", United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

The Farhud (1941), Death Toll Maximum180.000000

The Farhud (1941), Wars & Conflicts

Standing

Concerns Death Toll Maximum

Currently States 180.000000

Most later accounts of the pogrom, including the identified victim list gathered for the Moreh and Yehuda volume, instead cite roughly one hundred eighty Jewish dead specifically, a figure recurring across multiple independent named accounts; far higher popular claims are not attached to any named reconstruction traced here and are not adopted.

Source Al-Farhud: The 1941 Pogrom in Iraq, Edited by Shmuel Moreh and Zvi Yehuda