Disputed Statements

Sex, Activities Signified

Standing Scholarly debate

Concerns Significator

Currently States Sue Tompkins's The Contemporary Astrologer's Handbook (Flare Publications, 2006) records the modern scheme, developed after Pluto's 1930 discovery, that assigns Pluto rulership of Scorpio alongside its traditional lord Mars, reading Pluto as governing compulsion, transformation and the concealed material the eighth house already holds for sexuality; traditional practice rejects the outer planet rulerships outright and keeps Mars as Scorpio's only lord, and Tompkins records both positions have working practitioners today rather than one having displaced the other.

According To Modern Western astrology

Traditional practice rejects the outer planet rulerships outright and keeps Mars as the only lord of Scorpio, reading sexuality through Mars and Venus alone; both positions, traditional and modern, have working practitioners today.

Source The Contemporary Astrologer's Handbook, Sue Tompkins tier 2

Sha Ш, Alphabet Letters

Standing Scholarly debate

Concerns Historical Origin

Currently States Where the sign comes from is not agreed. Most readings derive it from the Glagolitic letter for the same sound; a comparison with Hebrew or Samaritan shin has been argued since the nineteenth century; a third position holds that a shape this plain cannot carry either derivation.

According To Early Cyrillic, the alphabet of Church Slavonic

Three positions are held and all three can be read. No exemplar of either Slavic alphabet survives from the ninth century, when the choices were made, so every argument runs on comparison of shapes in later manuscripts and none can be checked against a witness of the period. Recorded as debated rather than unknown because the camps are real; what is missing is an agreed criterion for deciding between them, which is what the open question on this page asks for.

Source Byzantine Missions Among the Slavs: SS. Constantine-Cyril and Methodius, Francis Dvornik tier 1

Shai ϣ, Alphabet Letters

Standing Scholarly debate

Concerns Origin Period

Currently States Greek letters wrote Egyptian from about the first century CE, settled by the fourth

According To The Coptic alphabet of Christian Egypt

The World's Writing Systems (Peter T. Daniels and William Bright, eds., Oxford University Press, 1996) surveys the small corpus of Old Coptic texts, pre-Christian magical and astrological papyri in which Egyptian was first written out using Greek letters plus a few signs borrowed from Demotic, against the standardised Coptic used in Christian scripture translation from around the third century CE onward. Comparing the two corpora, its contributors find the evidence thin enough to support two readings: that the Old Coptic magical texts already fixed the practice of writing Egyptian in Greek-based letters, or that the Christian translation project, needing a stable and teachable orthography for scripture, was the decisive act that standardised the script that survives. Because both readings draw on the same handful of surviving texts and no source describes an official act of decision, the volume treats the question as open rather than favouring either camp.

Source The World's Writing Systems, Peter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.) tier 1

Shambhala, Realms

Standing Scholarly debate

Concerns Origin of the Name

Currently States The Sanskrit Sambhala is of uncertain etymology; a connection to sam, peace or together, has been proposed but is not regarded as established.

Scholars of the Kalachakra tradition note that no derivation of Sambhala from known Sanskrit roots has won consensus, and the name may predate its absorption into Buddhist cosmology; the peace derivation remains a popular but unproven suggestion rather than a settled etymology.

Source Prisoners of Shangri-La: Tibetan Buddhism and the West, Donald S. Lopez Jr. tier 1

Shandao, Historical Figures

Standing Scholarly debate

Concerns Place of Origin

Currently States Traditionally Linzi, in modern Zibo, Shandong; other sources instead give Sizhou in modern Anhui, or Zhucheng in Shandong.

Luis O. Gomez's The Land of Bliss: The Paradise of the Buddha of Measureless Light (University of Hawaii Press, 1996) compares the named tertiary biographical sources and the traditional hagiographical accounts of Shandao's origin, and finds them genuinely disagreeing on which Chinese prefecture he was born in. Gomez's philological method, reading the surviving biographical notices against each other and against the absence of any contemporary Tang-dynasty administrative or family record naming his birthplace directly, finds no way to adjudicate between the competing prefecture claims, since all of them derive from religious biography compiled after his lifetime rather than from a document contemporary with his birth.

Source The Land of Bliss: The Paradise of the Buddha of Measureless Light, Luis O. Gomez (translator and editor) tier 1

Shankhini, Nadis

Standing Scholarly debate

Concerns Meaning in the Attesting Source

Currently States Shankhini receives two incompatible locations in the Yoga Upanishads. The Yogachudamani Upanishad places it in the anus, while the Shandilya Upanishad instead has it go upward to the end of the left ear, an entirely different region of the body. The corpus offers no resolution between the two accounts.

Source The Yoga Upanishads, T. R. Srinivasa Ayyangar (translator), edited by S. Subrahmanya Sastri tier 2

Shapira Strips, Artifacts & Relics

Standing Scholarly debate

Concerns 2021 Reassessment

Currently States Idan Dershowitz argues the strips were authentic and preserved a pre-exilic proto-Deuteronomy.

Idan Dershowitz's The Valediction of Moses: A Proto-Biblical Book (De Gruyter, 2021) reargued that the nineteenth century Shapira Strips, long dismissed as an 1883 forgery, are in fact an authentic ancient text. Dershowitz's method is philological, comparing the strips' Hebrew against the Dead Sea Scrolls discovered decades after their dismissal, arguing linguistic features once used to condemn them as forged are now paralleled in genuinely ancient material; biblical scholars including Ronald Hendel and Matthieu Richelle have published responses contesting Dershowitz's reading and upholding the original 1883 forgery verdict, so the reassessment remains a live, contested minority position rather than an accepted overturning of the earlier finding.

Source The Valediction of Moses: A Proto-Biblical Book, Idan Dershowitz tier 1

Shapira Strips, Artifacts & Relics

Standing Scholarly debate

Concerns 1883 Verdict

Currently States Declared forgeries by Clermont-Ganneau and Ginsburg, 1883.

The Biblical Archaeology Society's The Shapira Scrolls: Authentic or Forged? (2021) traces the original 1883 forgery verdict, delivered by the French scholar Charles Clermont-Ganneau after physical examination of the strips, against Idan Dershowitz's 2021 philological reassessment arguing for authenticity. The Society's survey method sets both examinations against each other and records that the 1883 forgery verdict has been reopened by Dershowitz's reassessment but that scholars remain divided, since Dershowitz's own linguistic argument has been directly contested rather than accepted by other specialists in the same field.

Source The Shapira Scrolls: Authentic or Forged?, Biblical Archaeology Society tier 2

Sheela-na-gig, Religious Symbols

Standing Scholarly debate

Concerns Standing as a Comparative Category

Currently States Four readings are held in print: a warning against lust, an apotropaic door figure, a survival of a pre-Christian female figure, and a folk birth image. None commands agreement and the carvings themselves carry no inscription.

Genuine camps, all publishing. The popular treatment of the carvings as certainly a goddess survival is the reading with the least support in the field.

Source Sheela-na-gigs: Unravelling an Enigma, Barbara Freitag tier 1

Sheela-na-gig, Religious Symbols

Standing Scholarly debate

Concerns Origin of the Name

Currently States Barbara Freitag's Sheela-na-gigs: Unravelling an Enigma (Routledge, 2004) establishes that the name Sheela-na-gig is first recorded only in the nineteenth century, many centuries after the medieval carvings themselves were made, and that its derivation remains disputed among proposed Irish etymologies; Freitag treats the name as a label applied long after the fact rather than as evidence of what the figures were originally called or what they meant, a caution applying equally to the rival readings of the carvings as a warning against lust, an apotropaic figure, an older female figure or an image connected with birth.

Source Sheela-na-gigs: Unravelling an Enigma, Barbara Freitag tier 1

Shema Yisrael, Creeds & Confessions

Standing Scholarly debate

Concerns Origin Period Start Year

Currently States -622

As a biblical text, Deuteronomy 6:4, critical scholarship most often connects the core of Deuteronomy to the religious reforms under King Josiah, conventionally dated to 622 BCE, while traditional belief holds it far older. As a fixed, twice daily liturgical declaration rather than a scriptural verse, the practice is documented only from the Second Temple period and is not codified as an obligation until the Mishnah, compiled around 200 CE. 622 BCE is recorded here for the text's own attributed context, not for its formalization as a creed.

Source Jewish Liturgy: A Comprehensive History, Ismar Elbogen, translated by Raymond P. Scheindlin tier 1

Shia (Twelver), Denominations

Standing Scholarly debate

Concerns Defining Doctrinal Position

Currently States In the Imam's absence a qualified jurist holds his political authority

The Qom position after Khomeini extends the jurist's guardianship to government and is the constitutional basis of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The Najaf position, held by Sistani and by most of the classical tradition, confines the jurist to guidance, law and the care of those with no guardian.

Source Modern Iran: Roots and Results of Revolution, Nikki R. Keddie tier 1

Shia (Twelver), Denominations

Standing Scholarly debate

Concerns Defining Doctrinal Position

Currently States In the Imam's absence the jurist guides and judges but does not rule

Living maraji' disagree over whether the marjaiyya's proper role is confined to guidance, law and charitable oversight during the Imam's occultation, the quietist model long associated with Najaf and Ali al-Sistani, or extends to political rule, the Qom model built into Iran's 1979 constitution. Linda S. Walbridge's edited volume The Most Learned of the Shia: The Institution of the Marjaiyya (Oxford University Press, 2001), a scholarly history of the marja al-taqlid institution, sets out both readings. The method is textual and institutional: reading the classical hadith and jurisprudential corpus on the occultation for an explicit mandate to govern, and finding none. Because no canonical text settles the question either way, both camps argue from the same silence rather than from competing evidence, and the atlas records the division rather than resolving it.

Source The Most Learned of the Shia: The Institution of the Marjaiyya, Linda S. Walbridge (ed.) tier 1

Shimabara Rebellion, Wars & Conflicts

Standing Scholarly debate

Concerns Religious Dimension

Currently States Scholars agree Matsukura's tax burden and a regional famine were the immediate triggers, but differ on how much weight to give the rebels' Christian identity as a distinct driver rather than an incidental feature of a heavily Christianized region's population. George Elison's study situates the revolt within the shogunate's broader ideological campaign against Christianity as an inherently seditious loyalty, one in which armed peasant resistance from Shimabara was read, and treated, as a religious rebellion regardless of its immediate economic trigger, which is why the shogunate's reprisal fell specifically on Christianity rather than on peasant unrest in general.

Source Deus Destroyed: The Image of Christianity in Early Modern Japan, George Elison tier 1

Shimabara Rebellion, Wars & Conflicts

Standing Scholarly debate

Concerns Death Toll Minimum

Currently States 37000.000000

The lower, more commonly cited figure holds that all roughly 37,000 rebels at Hara Castle were killed after the siege. A second figure of up to 40,000, including women and children in the besieged town, is also in circulation; both describe the same near-total massacre rather than two different events.

Source Deus Destroyed: The Image of Christianity in Early Modern Japan, George Elison tier 1

Shimabara Rebellion, Wars & Conflicts

Standing Scholarly debate

Concerns Death Toll Maximum

Currently States 40000.000000

See death-toll-min.

Source Deus Destroyed: The Image of Christianity in Early Modern Japan, George Elison tier 1

Shimon bar Yochai, Historical Figures

Standing Scholarly debate

Concerns Lifespan or Floruit Start Year

Currently States 90

Wikipedia's infobox states birth_date 90 and death_date "160 (aged 70)" with no citation attached to either figure. The Divinity Atlas's own Open Question 259456 records that rabbinic sources document his teaching, his hiding from Rome and his tomb at Meron, but that no source gives an actual birth or death year, and that the later literary Shimon bar Yochai of the Zohar complicates any single dating further. 90 and 160 are recorded here as the commonly repeated traditional figures, not as settled fact; the open question is left standing.

Source Wikipedia: Shimon bar Yochai tier 2

Shimon bar Yochai, Historical Figures

Standing Scholarly debate

Concerns Lifespan or Floruit End Year

Currently States 160

Wikipedia's infobox states birth_date 90 and death_date "160 (aged 70)" with no citation attached to either figure. The Divinity Atlas's own Open Question 259456 records that rabbinic sources document his teaching, his hiding from Rome and his tomb at Meron, but that no source gives an actual birth or death year, and that the later literary Shimon bar Yochai of the Zohar complicates any single dating further. 90 and 160 are recorded here as the commonly repeated traditional figures, not as settled fact; the open question is left standing.

Source Wikipedia: Shimon bar Yochai tier 2

Shin ש, Alphabet Letters

Standing Scholarly debate

Concerns Origin Period

Currently States Scholem places Sefer Yetzirah between the second and sixth century CE

According To Sefer Yetzirah: the thirty-two paths and the twenty-two letters

Gershom Scholem's Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism (Schocken Books, New York, 1961) surveys the manuscript recensions of Sefer Yetzirah and finds no single stable text: the surviving copies diverge enough in wording and in the letter-to-planet and letter-to-sign correspondences that quoting "the text" requires naming which recension is meant. Comparing the linguistic style, the doctrinal content and the external references made to the work across centuries of citation, Scholem argues the book could have been composed anywhere from the second to the ninth century CE, a span of roughly a millennium, with later Kabbalistic and Hasidic writers each reading it through their own era's overlay. The atlas follows Scholem's range rather than a narrower guess, and does not print the per-letter planet and sign tables at all, because doing so would silently pick one contested recension over the others.

Source Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism, Gershom Scholem tier 1

Shin ש, Alphabet Letters

Standing Scholarly debate

Concerns Origin Period

Currently States Survives in three recensions that do not agree in detail

According To Sefer Yetzirah: the thirty-two paths and the twenty-two letters

Gershom Scholem's Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism (Schocken Books, New York, 1961) surveys the manuscript recensions of Sefer Yetzirah and finds no single stable text: the surviving copies diverge enough in wording and in the letter-to-planet and letter-to-sign correspondences that quoting "the text" requires naming which recension is meant. Comparing the linguistic style, the doctrinal content and the external references made to the work across centuries of citation, Scholem argues the book could have been composed anywhere from the second to the ninth century CE, a span of roughly a millennium, with later Kabbalistic and Hasidic writers each reading it through their own era's overlay. The atlas follows Scholem's range rather than a narrower guess, and does not print the per-letter planet and sign tables at all, because doing so would silently pick one contested recension over the others.

Source Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism, Gershom Scholem tier 1