Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme

Divinity Atlas

Disputed Statements

Claims this atlas currently marks as unsettled or as tested and found false. A debated fact is one scholars hold competing positions on; a debunked one has been checked against the record and found not to hold. Both are kept in view rather than quietly smoothed over, with the reasoning that put each one where it stands.

3,315 statements marked Debated.

Sikh-Mughal Wars, Death Toll Maximum740.000000

Sikh-Mughal Wars, Wars & Conflicts

Standing

Concerns Death Toll Maximum

Currently States 740.000000

See death-toll-min. Accounts of the number of Sikh prisoners marched to Delhi after Banda Singh Bahadur's defeat run up to about 740, with roughly the same number reported captured as were later executed.

Source Joseph Davey Cunningham, A History of the Sikhs, from the Origin of the Nation to the Battles of the Sutlej (1849), Joseph Davey Cunningham

Sikh-Mughal Wars, Death Toll AssessmentThe recorded figure, 700 to 740, is scoped to one documented episode, the execution of captured Sikh prisoners at Delhi in 1716 following Banda Singh Bahadur's defeat, not an aggregate for the wider Sikh-Mughal Wars, which J.S. Grewal's history covers across decades of campaigns with no reconciled war-wide death total in the sources consulted. Framing this conflict is itself debated: Sikh historiography reads the Mughal campaigns, and the Delhi executions specifically, as religious persecution aimed at extirpating the Khalsa, while Mughal-court-focused accounts frame the same campaigns primarily as suppression of a rebellious regional power rather than a specifically confessional target; this atlas carries both readings rather than adopting either as settled.

Sikh-Mughal Wars, Wars & Conflicts

Standing

Concerns Death Toll Assessment

Currently States The recorded figure, 700 to 740, is scoped to one documented episode, the execution of captured Sikh prisoners at Delhi in 1716 following Banda Singh Bahadur's defeat, not an aggregate for the wider Sikh-Mughal Wars, which J.S. Grewal's history covers across decades of campaigns with no reconciled war-wide death total in the sources consulted. Framing this conflict is itself debated: Sikh historiography reads the Mughal campaigns, and the Delhi executions specifically, as religious persecution aimed at extirpating the Khalsa, while Mughal-court-focused accounts frame the same campaigns primarily as suppression of a rebellious regional power rather than a specifically confessional target; this atlas carries both readings rather than adopting either as settled.

Source J.S. Grewal, The Sikhs of the Punjab (New Cambridge History of India II.3), J. S. Grewal

Sila (Ethical Conduct), Origin PeriodSila as the second of the six Mahayana perfections, distinguished from ordinary Vinaya rule keeping by its grounding in motivation rather than external restraint, is attested through the bodhisattva precept literature that develops from roughly the fourth century CE onward, most prominently the Brahmajala Sutra, specifically within the Chinese Buddhist tradition rather than as an Indian innovation. Paul Williams's Mahayana Buddhism: The Doctrinal Foundations (Routledge, 1989) traces this precept literature as a distinct, later development alongside the six-perfections scheme itself.

Sila (Ethical Conduct), Virtues

Standing

Concerns Origin Period

Currently States Sila as the second of the six Mahayana perfections, distinguished from ordinary Vinaya rule keeping by its grounding in motivation rather than external restraint, is attested through the bodhisattva precept literature that develops from roughly the fourth century CE onward, most prominently the Brahmajala Sutra, specifically within the Chinese Buddhist tradition rather than as an Indian innovation. Paul Williams's Mahayana Buddhism: The Doctrinal Foundations (Routledge, 1989) traces this precept literature as a distinct, later development alongside the six-perfections scheme itself.

Source Mahayana Buddhism: The Doctrinal Foundations, Paul Williams

Silat, Standing as a Comparative CategoryUsed, but its validity as a comparative category is disputed

Silat, Practices

Standing

Concerns Standing as a Comparative Category

Currently States Used, but its validity as a comparative category is disputed

Silat names a family of Southeast Asian martial traditions practised across the Malay Archipelago, and its use as a single comparable religious category is disputed because no one religious tradition governs the art as a whole; religious framing is set by individual lineages rather than by silat itself. A given school of silat may present its practice in explicitly Islamic terms, reflecting the region's later Islamisation, or may draw on older animist or Hindu-Buddhist frameworks that predate that Islamisation and persisted alongside it in particular communities. Because the religious content differs by lineage rather than being a fixed property of silat, comparing silat as a whole against a religious tradition with one settled framework compares an internally varied family of practices against a single one, and the comparison changes meaning depending on which lineage is meant. This is not something a general reference can resolve, since it depends on which of many living lineages is being described.

Source Encyclopaedia Britannica (online academic reference), Encyclopaedia Britannica editors

Silat, Scholarly Standing DetailReligious framing varies by lineage: many schools are explicitly Islamic in orientation, while others draw on older animist or Hindu-Buddhist frameworks predating the region's Islamisation

Silat, Practices

Standing

Concerns Scholarly Standing Detail

Currently States Religious framing varies by lineage: many schools are explicitly Islamic in orientation, while others draw on older animist or Hindu-Buddhist frameworks predating the region's Islamisation

Silat lineages divide along the religious history of the communities that developed them: many schools, particularly in areas with a longer or deeper history of Islamic scholarship, present their practice in explicitly Islamic terms, framing training and combat readiness within Islamic ethical and spiritual vocabulary. Other schools, especially those rooted in communities and regions where older layers of belief persisted alongside or beneath the region's Islamisation, draw instead on animist or Hindu-Buddhist frameworks that predate Islam's arrival in the archipelago. Both kinds of lineage call their practice silat, and neither reading has displaced the other because the difference tracks real, distinct community histories rather than a single disputed fact about silat as such. The variation is treated as settled description rather than as an open question about which framing is correct, since both are correct for the lineages that hold them.

Source Encyclopaedia Britannica (online academic reference), Encyclopaedia Britannica editors

Simnel Cake, Symbolic MeaningA ring of marzipan balls, usually eleven, is read as the twelve apostles with Judas Iscariot omitted

Simnel Cake, Sacred Foods

Standing

Concerns Symbolic Meaning

Currently States A ring of marzipan balls, usually eleven, is read as the twelve apostles with Judas Iscariot omitted

According To Christianity

Food historians note the specific apostle reading is difficult to trace back very far in written sources, though it is the cake's own accepted tradition today. Recorded as debated rather than as settled symbolism.

Source The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised edition, F. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.)

Simon Magus, HistoricityHistoricity debated

Simon Magus, Figures

Standing

Concerns Historicity

Currently States Historicity debated

Irenaeus of Lyons's Against Heresies (Adversus Haereses), written more than a century after Simon Magus's reported lifetime, names him the source of all heresy, examining and cataloguing a range of rival teachings under his figure. Modern scholars, examining Irenaeus's heresiological method and its evident polemical purpose, are divided on whether a real Simonian school existed substantially as Irenaeus describes it or whether later Christian polemicists retrofitted a range of unrelated rival teachings onto the one rival already condemned by name in the Acts of the Apostles.

Source Against Heresies (Adversus Haereses), Irenaeus of Lyons

Simon Magus, Historicity DetailAttested in Acts 8 as a magician active in Samaria. How much of the later legendary tradition, the flight and fall at Rome, the Simonian sect as the origin of Gnosticism, reflects a real historical figure rather than heresiological legend-building is disputed by scholars.

Simon Magus, Figures

Standing

Concerns Historicity Detail

Currently States Attested in Acts 8 as a magician active in Samaria. How much of the later legendary tradition, the flight and fall at Rome, the Simonian sect as the origin of Gnosticism, reflects a real historical figure rather than heresiological legend-building is disputed by scholars.

Source Against Heresies (Adversus Haereses), Irenaeus of Lyons

Sin as Illness in Orthodox Theology, Meaning in the Attesting SourceAncestral sin (propatorikon hamartema) names what is inherited as mortality and corruption together with a weakened will, and not as inherited guilt.

Sin as Illness in Orthodox Theology, Doctrines

Standing

Concerns Meaning in the Attesting Source

Currently States Ancestral sin (propatorikon hamartema) names what is inherited as mortality and corruption together with a weakened will, and not as inherited guilt.

John Meyendorff's Byzantine Theology: Historical Trends and Doctrinal Themes (Fordham University Press, 1979) sets out two readings of the same patristic evidence on ancestral sin, propatorikon hamartema, which names what is inherited as mortality and corruption together with a weakened will, and not as inherited guilt. Meyendorff's own reading, built from close study of the Greek fathers' commentary on Romans 5:12, holds they read the verse as because all sinned and never taught inherited guilt, and that the Latin rendering in whom all sinned is what made inherited guilt possible in the West. The opposing reading, examining the same Greek patristic corpus, holds the contrast is drawn too sharply, that Greek writers also speak of inherited culpability in places, and that the divergence is more a modern polemical construction than a patristic fact.

Source Byzantine Theology: Historical Trends and Doctrinal Themes, John Meyendorff

Sin س, Meaning in the Attesting SourceOne of the fourteen letters that stand disjoined at the head of a sura

Sin س, Alphabet Letters

Standing

Concerns Meaning in the Attesting Source

Currently States One of the fourteen letters that stand disjoined at the head of a sura

According To The disjoined letters of the Quran

The Study Quran: A New Translation and Commentary (Seyyed Hossein Nasr, editor-in-chief, HarperOne, 2015) surveys the classical and modern commentary tradition on the disjoined letters that open certain suras and reports no consensus reached across fourteen centuries of that commentary. The positions it records include that the meaning is known to God alone, that the letters abbreviate divine names or attributes, that they function as an oath, that they present ordinary letters of the language as a rhetorical challenge, and that some began as scribal or collectors' marks later treated as scripture. Comparing the internal textual evidence, which letters occur and in which suras, against the range of proposed readings, the commentary confirms which letters appear where while confirming that none of the proposed meanings has displaced the others.

Source The Study Quran: A New Translation and Commentary, Seyyed Hossein Nasr (editor-in-chief)

Sin س, Origin of the NameHolds the position and numeral value of Hebrew samekh while its name resembles that of shin

Sin س, Alphabet Letters

Standing

Concerns Origin of the Name

Currently States Holds the position and numeral value of Hebrew samekh while its name resembles that of shin

According To Comparative Semitic epigraphy

The sibilant letters of the Semitic alphabets cannot be mapped one to one. Reconstructions of the sound and name shifts behind them differ on which mergers came first and on the ancestral values, and the disagreement is live in the comparative literature. The atlas records the ordinal position and the numeral value, which are directly attested, and does not assert a name derivation for sin.

Source The World's Writing Systems, Peter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.)

Sincerity, Origin PeriodNamed in Book Four of Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, composed at his Lyceum in Athens and generally placed in his later career, the 330s to 320s BCE. The Ethics survives through the medieval manuscript tradition rather than as an autograph, and scholars continue to debate whether it reached its present form as Aristotle's own draft or as lecture notes edited after his death, so its precise date of composition is bounded only broadly.

Sincerity, Virtues

Standing

Concerns Origin Period

Currently States Named in Book Four of Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, composed at his Lyceum in Athens and generally placed in his later career, the 330s to 320s BCE. The Ethics survives through the medieval manuscript tradition rather than as an autograph, and scholars continue to debate whether it reached its present form as Aristotle's own draft or as lecture notes edited after his death, so its precise date of composition is bounded only broadly.

Source Virtue Ethics (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry), Rosalind Hursthouse and Glen Pettigrove

Sino-Tibetan, Homeland HypothesisEither the upper Yellow River basin, tying the family to millet farming, or the eastern Himalayan foothills, where present diversity is greatest.

Sino-Tibetan, Language Families

Standing

Concerns Homeland Hypothesis

Currently States Either the upper Yellow River basin, tying the family to millet farming, or the eastern Himalayan foothills, where present diversity is greatest.

The two accounts rest on different kinds of evidence: archaeology and agricultural vocabulary on one side, the distribution of present-day diversity on the other. They imply different dates for the family and different directions of spread.

Source The Sino-Tibetan Languages, Graham Thurgood and Randy J. LaPolla (eds.)

Sino-Tibetan, Classification StatusAccepted as a family, but its internal structure is among the least settled of any large family. Whether Chinese stands apart from everything else has been argued at length, and Tai-Kadai and Hmong-Mien, once included, are now usually excluded.

Sino-Tibetan, Language Families

Standing

Concerns Classification Status

Currently States Accepted as a family, but its internal structure is among the least settled of any large family. Whether Chinese stands apart from everything else has been argued at length, and Tai-Kadai and Hmong-Mien, once included, are now usually excluded.

Thurgood and LaPolla's edited volume treats Sino-Tibetan's existence as a family as settled; what remains argued is its internal shape. One long-running question is whether Chinese forms its own primary branch standing apart from all the rest (a Sino-Tibetan split, sometimes called Sino-Bodic on the other reading) or whether it groups more closely with particular subfamilies within the rest of the family; specialists working from different subsets of shared vocabulary and sound-correspondence data have argued both positions since the family's classification was first proposed. A second, now largely settled question over the family's outer boundary illustrates how the internal debate proceeds: Tai-Kadai and Hmong-Mien were included in early twentieth-century classifications on the strength of shared vocabulary later shown to be the product of extensive contact and borrowing with Chinese rather than common descent, and both are now usually excluded on that reading. The Chinese-position question remains open because, unlike the Tai-Kadai and Hmong-Mien case, no comparable contact explanation has been demonstrated to account for the vocabulary linking Chinese to the rest of the family, leaving inheritance and an unusually deep split both still on the table.

Source The Sino-Tibetan Languages, Graham Thurgood and Randy J. LaPolla (eds.)

Sip, Meaning in the Attesting SourceGenerally read as a red conjunction, forming a pair with the black one named by the preceding month Wo, though the element rendered conjunction is the least certain part of the gloss.

Sip, Haab Months

Standing

Concerns Meaning in the Attesting Source

Currently States Generally read as a red conjunction, forming a pair with the black one named by the preceding month Wo, though the element rendered conjunction is the least certain part of the gloss.

The colour term is well attested and matches the pairing with Wo, the preceding black month, but the second element rests on a reconstruction from colonial Yucatec sources rather than an independently confirmed glyphic reading. The sixteenth-century Spanish transmission this gloss depends on is not necessarily what Classic-period scribes carving the same month name would have said.

Source Relacion de las cosas de Yucatan, Diego de Landa

Siri Rag, Point in DisputeHow many rags the Guru Granth Sahib uses. Thirty-one is the count of principal rag sections, and other counting conventions reach the sixties.

Siri Rag, Scripture Portions

Standing

Concerns Point in Dispute

Currently States How many rags the Guru Granth Sahib uses. Thirty-one is the count of principal rag sections, and other counting conventions reach the sixties.

Thirty-one is the count of principal rag headings, and is the figure ordinarily given. Counting differently is defensible: many headings qualify a rag with a named variant, and compound headings such as Nat Narayan and Mali Gaura name two measures at once, so systems that count variants and compounds separately arrive at figures in the sixties. The disagreement is about classification, not about the contents of the volume.

Source The Encyclopaedia of Sikhism, Harbans Singh (editor-in-chief)

Sirius B, The ClaimThat Dogon tradition long knew of an invisible, very heavy, very small companion of Sirius orbiting in about fifty years.

Sirius B, Fixed Stars

Standing

Concerns The Claim

Currently States That Dogon tradition long knew of an invisible, very heavy, very small companion of Sirius orbiting in about fifty years.

According To As reported of Dogon religion

This report by Marcel Griaule, later expanded with Germaine Dieterlen, is the entire basis of the star's reputation in esoteric literature. What is disputed is not whether Griaule wrote it down but whether it records Dogon tradition or Griaule's own leading questions coming back to him.

Source Dieu d'eau: entretiens avec Ogotemmeli, Marcel Griaule

Sisavang Vatthana, Lifespan or Floruit End Year1978

Sisavang Vatthana, Historical Figures

Standing

Concerns Lifespan or Floruit End Year

Currently States 1978

The Pathet Lao government never announced his death, and no official record has surfaced. 1978 is the year most commonly cited by later historical accounts of his time in the re-education camp, but it rests on secondhand reporting rather than a documented date, and some accounts place his death slightly later.

Source A History of Laos, Martin Stuart-Fox

Sita, Status Within the TraditionRevered across Hindu tradition as an ideal of wifely devotion and chastity, a reading some modern feminist scholars have challenged as endorsing her subordination and repeated trials.

Sita, Figures

Standing

Concerns Status Within the Tradition

Currently States Revered across Hindu tradition as an ideal of wifely devotion and chastity, a reading some modern feminist scholars have challenged as endorsing her subordination and repeated trials.

Traditional devotional readings hold up her steadfastness through exile, abduction and the fire trial as the model of ideal womanhood; modern feminist critics read the same episodes as the text repeatedly making her prove her worth to a husband who repeatedly doubts her, and the two readings remain unreconciled in contemporary scholarship and popular commentary alike.

Source Encyclopedia of Hinduism, Denise Cush, Catherine Robinson and Michael York (eds.)

Skull Relic of Xuanzang, Attributed ToXuanzang (602-664), Tang pilgrim-monk

Skull Relic of Xuanzang, Artifacts & Relics

Standing

Concerns Attributed To

Currently States Xuanzang (602-664), Tang pilgrim-monk

The Wikipedia contributors' Xuanzang Temple, Nanjing entry (2025 access) documents the skull relic venerated there as belonging to the seventh century Chinese Buddhist monk and translator Xuanzang. The entry's method is a survey of the relic's documented custodial history and the inscriptions on its various historical reliquaries, and it finds the identification of the bone fragment as genuinely Xuanzang's own skull rests on those reliquary inscriptions and the temple traditions transmitting them, rather than on any independent modern forensic or genetic examination of the bone itself.

Source Xuanzang Temple, Nanjing (Wikipedia), Wikipedia contributors