Doctrines
The One Beyond Being
God and Divine Nature
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Plotinus places at the summit of reality a principle he calls the One, and also the Good, and insists that it is beyond being and beyond intellect. It has no parts, no qualities and no relations, and every predicate applied to it is either a negation or a statement about its effects rather than about it. This is the source of the negative theology running through later Christian, Jewish and Islamic thought, the practice of saying what God is not, on the ground that affirmative statements drag the source down to the level of what came from it. The One is not a person, does not deliberate and does not choose to produce; production follows from what it is, as light follows from its source without the source being diminished, which is the analogy Plotinus uses most often. What can be said positively is said of what comes next, the Intellect, in which being and thinking are one act, and of the Soul below it.
Facts
Scholarship and Forensics
Scholarly NoteThis is the source of the negative theology running through later Christian, Jewish and Islamic thought, the practice of saying what God is not, on the ground that affirmative statements drag the source down to the level of what came from it. 1 Position Profile
Principal ProponentPlotinus, who places the One at the summit of reality, calls it also the Good, and insists that it is beyond being and beyond intellect. 1 Belief
SubjectThe nature of the divine 1 Status
Status Within the TraditionDefined and binding within this tradition 1 Doctrinal Category Learn More
The Four Words Plotinus Took From Plato's Sun
Plotinus did not invent the claim that the highest principle lies beyond being, he lifted the phrase from a specific line in Plato's Republic and built a metaphysics on top of it. In the Republic's account of the sun as an image for the Good, Plato says the Good is not being but is beyond being, exceeding it in age and power, four words offered almost in passing to close an analogy about sight and light. Plotinus quotes the phrase directly and repeatedly across the Enneads and treats it as though Plato had stated a doctrine rather than reached for a striking image, converting an aside about the sun into the founding claim of his own system, that the One which grounds all being cannot itself be a being without collapsing back into what it grounds. Hadot's study traces how much weight later tradition hung on those four words once Plotinus had fixed them as technical vocabulary rather than metaphor, Proclus, Damascius and eventually Christian, Jewish and Islamic writers working centuries after Plato inheriting a phrase meant to describe a sun's relationship to sight and using it to describe God's relationship to existence itself. The borrowing is direct enough to trace and consequential enough that negative theology across three religious traditions can be read as a very long commentary on one sentence from a dialogue about justice.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.