Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Empires & Polities

Byzantine Empire

Also Known As Eastern Roman Empire Alias rather than a new entry: the atlas already holds this state as Polity 2, and its own ApproxDate note records the second name. · Eastern Empire The usual short form in older histories. · Byzantine The adjectival form, as in Byzantine liturgy and the Byzantine rite.
Empires

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The Byzantine Empire, which called itself Roman and whose people called themselves Rhomaioi, ruled from Constantinople from the fourth century to 1453. Its emperors convened the councils that fixed Christian doctrine, its capital held the largest church in the world for nearly a thousand years, and its missions carried Orthodoxy and a written alphabet to the Slavs. It fought an internal war over images for more than a century, broke with Rome, was sacked by a crusade, and fell to the Ottomans, leaving behind the Orthodox churches of eastern Europe.

Facts
Finances
Institutional Wealth or Finances
The historian Peter Charanis reports a modern authority's estimate, attributed to V. G. Vasilievsky, that by the end of the seventh century about one third of the usable land within the Byzantine Empire was held by the church and its monasteries. Monastic landholding continued to expand after this point through further endowments, purchases and encroachment on peasant holdings. 3
Basis of the Wealth Figure
Journalistic or Scholarly Estimate 3
Financial Disclosure Regime
No contemporary Byzantine census of church and monastic property survives. The estimate is a modern historian's synthesis of scattered evidence rather than a figure the Byzantine church or state itself published, and the empire had no standing reporting regime requiring one. 3
Wealth Figure As Of Year
700 3
The estimate is given as of the end of the seventh century rather than a specific date; 700 CE is recorded here as the nearest representable year, not a precise date the source itself states.
Origins
Origin Region
Anatolia and the eastern Mediterranean, governed from Constantinople, with its missions reaching the Slavs of eastern Europe from the ninth century 2
Disputed
Religious Policy
How far the emperor governed the church is argued. The western term caesaropapism describes a state church directed from the throne, while Dagron and others point to patriarchs who excommunicated emperors and monks who brought them down, and read the relationship as a contested double authority 4
The caesaropapist reading and the double-authority reading are both current in Byzantine studies; Dagron's study of the imperial office is the standard statement of the second.
Attributions
Associated Religion
Eastern Orthodoxy, whose theology of the icon, liturgical rite, monastic tradition and autocephalous church structure were all shaped inside this empire and outlived it 1
Religion and State
State Religion
Chalcedonian Christianity in its Greek form, with the emperor convening the ecumenical councils, confirming their canons and appointing and deposing patriarchs 2
Learn More
An Empire That Called Itself Roman

Nobody in Constantinople ever called the state Byzantine; the word is a coinage of sixteenth century scholarship. Its subjects called themselves Rhomaioi, Romans, and understood their empire as the same one Augustus had founded, now Christian and now Greek speaking. Constantine refounded the city of Byzantion as his capital in 330, and for eleven centuries it remained the seat of an emperor who claimed universal authority under God.

The emperor's place in the church was the central and unresolved question of Byzantine political theology. He convened the ecumenical councils, confirmed their canons, appointed and deposed patriarchs, legislated on heresy and processed inside the sanctuary at his coronation. He was not a priest and could not celebrate the liturgy, yet Gilbert Dagron's study of the imperial office shows how persistently Byzantine ceremonial reached for priestly imagery, and how the western label of caesaropapism flattens a relationship in which patriarchs excommunicated emperors and monks brought them down.

Justinian I, who reigned from 527 to 565, is the clearest case of the two powers in one hand. He legislated on the theology of the Trinity, closed the Athenian schools, forced the bishops of the empire to condemn texts he disliked, and rebuilt Hagia Sophia after the Nika riot, dedicating in 537 a domed church so large that no builder attempted its equal for nine hundred years.

Icons, Missions and the Long Fall

The empire spent much of the eighth and ninth centuries at war with itself over images. Emperors from Leo III moved against the veneration of icons; the Second Council of Nicaea restored it in 787; a second iconoclast period followed from 815 until the restoration of 843, still kept as the Sunday of the Triumph of Orthodoxy. Leslie Brubaker and John Haldon's reassessment argues that the destruction was far less systematic than the victorious iconophile sources claimed, and that the crisis was as much about imperial authority as about theology. Its settlement gave Orthodoxy a theology of the image that has governed its art ever since.

Outward, the empire's greatest export was its religion. The mission of Cyril and Methodius in the 860s produced a Slavonic alphabet and liturgy, and the conversion of Rus at Kiev around 988 carried Byzantine Christianity into the lands that became Russia, Ukraine and Belarus.

The breaks came in turn. The mutual excommunications of 1054 hardened the estrangement from Rome into schism; the Fourth Crusade sacked Constantinople in 1204 and ruled it for fifty seven years, an injury that made reunion politically impossible; and on 29 May 1453 the city fell to Mehmed II, who converted Hagia Sophia into a mosque. What survived was the church: autocephalous Orthodox patriarchates, a liturgy, and in Moscow the claim to be a third Rome.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Constantinople, Cities

Constantinople was the imperial capital from 330 and the seat of the ecumenical patriarch, and its fall in 1453 ended the empire.

Orthodoxy's liturgy, its theology of the icon and its structure of autocephalous churches were all formed inside this empire.

Hagia Sophia was dedicated by Justinian in 537, held the coronations and the patriarchal liturgy, and was converted to a mosque in 1453.

Justinian I legislated on doctrine, closed the Athenian schools and rebuilt Hagia Sophia after the Nika riot.

The conversion came from Byzantium and brought Slavonic liturgy with it.

For eleven centuries this was the front door of the Byzantine empire and the water across which its enemies came.

Source Byzantium in the Iconoclast Era, c. 680-850: A HistoryLeslie Brubaker and John Haldon

The conversion of Rus at Kiev around 988 carried Byzantine Christianity into the lands that became Russia, Ukraine and Belarus.

This source names Byzantine Empire directly: "from tenth century Bulgaria into the Byzantine Empire."

The mutual excommunications of 1054 hardened the estrangement between Constantinople and Rome into a lasting schism.

This source names Byzantine Empire directly: "church and monastic landholding in the Byzantine Empire and the state's periodic attempts to check it."

The Second Council of Nicaea in 787 restored the veneration of icons, and the final settlement of 843 is kept as the Triumph of Orthodoxy.

Source Byzantium in the Iconoclast Era, c. 680-850: A HistoryLeslie Brubaker and John Haldon

Umayyad sieges of Constantinople in the 670s and in 717 and 718 failed, fixing the frontier between the caliphate and Byzantium for centuries.

Conducted

Sources
1. Byzantium in the Iconoclast Era, c. 680-850: A History
Leslie Brubaker and John Haldon, Cambridge University Press, 2011
2. Byzantine Theology: Historical Trends and Doctrinal Themes
John Meyendorff, Fordham University Press, 1979View the Source
3. The Monastic Properties and the State in the Byzantine Empire
Peter Charanis, Dumbarton Oaks Papers, vol. 4, 1948View the Source
4. Emperor and Priest: The Imperial Office in Byzantium
Gilbert Dagron, Cambridge University Press, 2003
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.