Enneagram Types
The Reformer
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Origin 1916 to 1949
Type One, the Reformer (also called the Perfectionist), is one of the nine personality types of the Enneagram, a modern system of character developed in the twentieth century by Oscar Ichazo and Claudio Naranjo and popularized by later teachers. The One is rational, principled, self-controlled, and driven to improve things and to live by a clear inner standard of right and wrong. Its basic fear is of being corrupt, defective, or bad, and its basic desire is to be good, virtuous, and in integrity. Its characteristic vice or passion is anger (felt as chronic resentment at imperfection), and its balancing virtue is serenity, the acceptance of reality as it is. The One belongs to the Body or Gut triad, whose central issue is anger and control, and it sits between the Nine and Two wings. Under growth (integration) the One moves toward the spontaneity and joy of the healthy Seven; under stress (disintegration) it takes on the moodiness and self-absorption of the unhealthy Four.
Facts
Origins
Origin Period1916 to 1949 2Tradition: The enneagram symbol (G. I. Gurdjieff) Origin Period1971 to 1975 2Tradition: Enneagram of personality (Ichazo and Naranjo) Origin PeriodHe taught the scheme in Chile through the later 1960s and formally from his Arica Institute from 1970, mapping nine ego-fixations onto Gurdjieff's figure 2Tradition: Enneagram of personality (Ichazo and Naranjo) Origin PeriodThe nine types are Oscar Ichazo's 2Tradition: Enneagram of personality (Ichazo and Naranjo) Origin PeriodThis is the moment the personality system comes into existence and there is no earlier one 2Tradition: Enneagram of personality (Ichazo and Naranjo) Place of OriginArica in northern Chile, and then Berkeley, California 2Tradition: Enneagram of personality (Ichazo and Naranjo) Place of OriginMoscow and Saint Petersburg, where Gurdjieff was teaching in 1916, and then Constantinople and Fontainebleau, where the work continued after the revolution. 2Tradition: The enneagram symbol (G. I. Gurdjieff) Place of OriginThe system is South American and North American in equal measure and belongs to the countercultural psychology of the years around 1970 2Tradition: Enneagram of personality (Ichazo and Naranjo) Creator / OriginatorOscar Ichazo, who made the nine-type scheme and attached it to Gurdjieff's figure, and Claudio Naranjo, whose psychological elaboration is the version the later literature descends from. Both are named, both are recent, and neither claim is disputed by anyone who has looked at the record. 2 Origin of the Name"Enneagram" is Greek: ennea, nine, and gramma, a figure or a thing drawn. The word names the DIAGRAM and nothing else. Its transfer to a nine-type personality theory happened in the twentieth century and is the source of most of the confusion about the system's age, a reader told that the enneagram is old is being told something true about a shape and something false about a typology. 2Tradition: The enneagram symbol (G. I. Gurdjieff) Attributions
Wing TypesSourced to the subject's own accountType One's two possible wings are Nine (the Peacemaker, giving 1w9) and Two (the Helper, giving 1w2); a type is read as a blend with whichever adjacent type is more prominent in a given individual. 1 Debunked
Attributed Author / CompilerPopular writing traces the system to a Sarmoung Brotherhood in central Asia, to Sufi masters, to the desert fathers, to Pythagoras. No independent evidence for the Sarmoung Brotherhood exists; Gurdjieff's account of visiting it is read even by sympathetic scholars as teaching narrative, not reportage; no Sufi order used the figure this way; and the figure is not attested before Gurdjieff. 2Tradition: The enneagram symbol (G. I. Gurdjieff) Carole M. Cusack's article "The Enneagram: G. I. Gurdjieff's Esoteric Symbol" (Aries: Journal for the Study of Western Esotericism, vol. 20, no. 1, Brill, 2020, pp. 31-54) traces the nine-pointed figure to George Gurdjieff's own early twentieth-century teaching and examines the lineage claims later attached to it, that it descends from a Sarmoung Brotherhood, from Sufi masters, from the Christian desert fathers, or from Pythagoras. Checking each claim against the documentary record, Cusack finds no independent evidence a Sarmoung Brotherhood existed, no Sufi order that used the figure this way, and no attestation of the symbol earlier than Gurdjieff's own circle. The personality-typing use of the enneagram, distinct from Gurdjieff's own geometric teaching, was added later still, by Oscar Ichazo and Claudio Naranjo in the 1960s and 1970s. On that documentary record the ancient-lineage claim is not historical. Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting SourceIn Gurdjieff's own teaching the figure is a diagram of how any process unfolds: a circle divided by nine points, carrying the law of three and the law of seven, with the inner lines showing where a process must be fed from outside if it is not to run down. It describes events, not people. Nothing in it identifies a type, and no published student of Gurdjieff attaches one. 2Tradition: The enneagram symbol (G. I. Gurdjieff) Meaning in the Attesting SourceThe passion Ichazo gives type One is ANGER, which is one of the classical capital vices, ira in Gregory the Great's seven, and among the eight thoughts Evagrius listed before him. Ichazo took that Christian ascetic list as his raw material and stretched it to nine. The classical tradition attaches the vice to a temptation, not to a type of person; the pairing with a personality is his. 2Tradition: Enneagram of personality (Ichazo and Naranjo) Status
Standing as a Comparative CategoryUsed, but its validity as a comparative category is disputed 3 Contested Use
Contested or Appropriated Modern UseVery widely used and very thinly evidenced, and both halves are true. A systematic review of 104 samples found the subscales relate to established measures as the theory predicts, but that factor analyses typically recover FEWER THAN NINE factors and that no study derives the nine types by clustering. It is not a validated instrument and must not be used for hiring or clinical decisions. 3 Learn More
Type One in the System
Type One, named the Reformer or Perfectionist in the Riso-Hudson nomenclature, is placed in the body or gut triad with Eight and Nine, and its core emotional material is therefore anger. The system gives it a basic desire to be good and to have integrity, and a basic fear of being corrupt, defective or wrong. Its passion, in the vocabulary Oscar Ichazo took from the Christian capital vices, is anger, and its corresponding virtue is serenity; the characteristic form the anger takes is resentment held in rather than expressed, since expressing it would itself be a failure of standards. Its wings are Nine and Two. Under stress the system places One at Four, taking on melancholy and a sense of being uniquely flawed; in growth it moves to Seven, becoming more spontaneous and less driven.
Riso and Hudson's second classification, the Hornevian groups drawn from Karen Horney's three neurotic trends and set out in The Wisdom of the Enneagram (1999), places One among the compliant types, alongside Two and Six, since the type's orientation is toward an internalized standard of duty and correctness rather than toward assertion or withdrawal. This is a separate axis from the body triad above; each of the nine types belongs to one of three triads by core emotion and to one of three Hornevian groups by interpersonal strategy, and the two groupings do not coincide.
Where the Passions Come From
The nine passions are the clearest link between the modern Enneagram and older material, and also the clearest sign that the modern system is a construction. Oscar Ichazo built his scheme on the list of capital vices of the Christian ascetic tradition, the seven of Gregory the Great which descend from the eight logismoi of Evagrius Ponticus, and expanded them to nine by adding deceit for type Three and fear for type Six, neither of which appears in the classical list. The paired virtues are likewise adapted. Ichazo taught this material in Chile in the 1960s and at his Arica Institute from 1970, and it is his synthesis; there is no ancient source in which nine passions are matched to nine types on a nine-pointed figure. Saying so is not a criticism of the system's usefulness, only an accurate statement of where it came from.
A further layer, the tritype, was added later still: Katherine Chernick Fauvre developed the theory in 1994 and 1995, building on scattered remarks by Ichazo and Naranjo but organizing them into a formal model only she published, holding that a person carries one dominant type from each of the three triads, body, heart and head, for twenty-seven possible three-number combinations said to describe a fuller personality than any single type alone. Like the rest of the system's internal machinery, the tritype is a later, datable addition with a named author, not part of Ichazo's or Naranjo's original teaching.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Disciplines That Use This
Disintegrates Toward
Riso-Hudson stress/disintegration direction: under stress, Type One moves toward the unhealthy qualities of Type Four.
Disintegration Point For
Riso-Hudson stress/disintegration direction: Type Seven moves toward the unhealthy qualities of Type One.
Integrates Toward
Riso-Hudson growth/integration direction: under security, Type One moves toward the healthy qualities of Type Seven.
Integration Point For
Riso-Hudson growth/integration direction: Type Four moves toward the healthy qualities of Type One.
Sources
1. Personality Types: Using the Enneagram for Self-Discovery
Don Richard Riso and Russ Hudson, Houghton Mifflin, 1987Type One, the Reformer
1. Personality Types: Using the Enneagram for Self-Discovery
Don Richard Riso and Russ Hudson, Houghton Mifflin, 1987Integrates Toward: The Enthusiast
1. Personality Types: Using the Enneagram for Self-Discovery
Don Richard Riso and Russ Hudson, Houghton Mifflin, 1987Disintegrates Toward: The Individualist
1. Personality Types: Using the Enneagram for Self-Discovery
Don Richard Riso and Russ Hudson, Houghton Mifflin, 1987Integration Point For: The Individualist
1. Personality Types: Using the Enneagram for Self-Discovery
Don Richard Riso and Russ Hudson, Houghton Mifflin, 1987Disintegration Point For: The Enthusiast
2. The Enneagram: G. I. Gurdjieff's Esoteric Symbol
Carole M. Cusack, Aries: Journal for the Study of Western Esotericism 20, no. 1 (Brill), pp. 31-54, 2020on Arica and on the Berkeley groupsView the Source 3. The Enneagram: A systematic review of the literature and directions for future research
Joshua N. Hook, Todd W. Hall, Don E. Davis, Daryl R. Van Tongeren and Mackenzie Conner, Journal of Clinical Psychology, volume 77 number 4, 2021the review's conclusions and its cautions on applied useView the Source Interviews with Oscar Ichazo
Oscar Ichazo, Arica Institute Press, 1982the nine passions and the nine virtues
Essays About This Entity (2 essays)
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.