Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Enochian Aethyrs

ARN

ARN

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin 1584

The second of the thirty Aethyrs, governed by Doagnis, Pacasna and Dialioa. The Aethyrs are also called Aires in the manuscripts, and each is named by a three-letter word received through Kelley in the showstone. They are not addressed by thirty separate invocations: a single call, the last of the set Dee recorded, serves all of them, with the name of the Aethyr inserted into it at the appropriate point. That economy of design is one of the more striking features of the received material and is present in the diaries themselves rather than added later.

Facts
Origins
Origin Period
1584 1Tradition: John Dee and Edward Kelley's angelic sessions
Origin Period
1888 to 1900 2Tradition: Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn
Origin Period
1900 to 1909 3Tradition: Thelema
Origin PeriodSourced to the subject's own account
Compiled into Liber Scientiae, dated 2 May 1585 4Tradition: Dee and Kelley's Enochian records
Origin PeriodSourced to the subject's own account
Sessions ran from 1583, completed 13 July 1584 4Tradition: Dee and Kelley's Enochian records
Place of Origin
Cracow and Prague, under Albert Laski's patronage and the imperial court 5
Place of Origin
Dee's house at Mortlake for the earlier sessions 5
Attributed Author / Compiler
Edward Kelley scried and spoke the answers Dee wrote down 5
Attributed Author / Compiler
John Dee, mathematician and royal adviser, asked the questions 5
Attributed Author / Compiler
No independent witness to the sessions exists 5
Origin of the NameSourced to the subject's own account
No etymology, not derived from any known language 6
Origin of the NameSourced to the subject's own account
Received letter by letter through Kelley's scrying in 1584 6
Origin of the NameSourced to the subject's own account
Set down in Dee's record 6
LanguageSourced to the subject's own account
Enochian (Angelical) 6
Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting SourceSourced to the subject's own account
Crowley scried the Aethyrs in 1900 and 1909, centuries after Dee 4Tradition: Dee and Kelley's Enochian records
Meaning in the Attesting SourceSourced to the subject's own account
Dee's record gives only a name and its Governors, nothing else 4Tradition: Dee and Kelley's Enochian records
Meaning in the Attesting SourceSourced to the subject's own account
Visionary landscapes and guardians are the Golden Dawn's 1888 synthesis 4Tradition: Dee and Kelley's Enochian records
Status
Standing as a Comparative Category
A modern system making claims scholarship never entertained; it never held scholarly standing 5
Whether Kelley reported or invented what he saw is an open question
Learn More
The Second Aethyr, ARN

John Dee, the mathematician, astrologer and royal adviser who conducted the sessions that produced the Aethyrs, was one of the most learned men in Elizabethan England, amassing one of the largest private libraries in the country at his house in Mortlake and advising Elizabeth I on matters ranging from navigation to the calendar. His scryer, Edward Kelley, brought a considerably less respectable background to their partnership: before the two men met in 1582, Kelley had reportedly been convicted of forgery or coining and, by some later accounts, had lost his ears as the punishment for it, a detail Dee's own diaries never mention directly but that shaped Kelley's later reputation among historians who doubt his honesty.

That doubt runs through modern assessment of every Aethyr, ARN included, since the entire content beyond the bare three-letter name and its Governors rests on Kelley's word alone, spoken aloud while Dee wrote it down, with no independent witness to confirm what Kelley actually saw or claimed to see in the scrying stone. Frances Yates, the historian of Renaissance esotericism, called Kelley an outright fraud; other scholars are more cautious, noting that Dee's diaries are excellent evidence of what Dee sincerely believed was happening but poor evidence of what, if anything, was objectively true, a gap that the Second Aethyr's own extremely thin original record, a name and a list of Governors and nothing more, does nothing to close.

ARN Through Its Three Layers

Any statement about the second Aethyr belongs to one of three layers of the record, and they are roughly three centuries apart. Saying which layer a claim comes from is most of what can honestly be said about an individual Aethyr.

The diaries, 1580s

The name ARN, its place as the second of the thirty, and the governors assigned to it all come from the scrying sessions of John Dee and Edward Kelley in the 1580s. In that material the thirty Aethyrs divide the earth between ninety-one governors: twenty-nine Aethyrs hold three each and the thirtieth holds four. This atlas carries all ninety-one, and the arithmetic can be checked against them.

Counting the thirty

The Aethyrs are numbered with LIL as the first and TEX as the thirtieth, and the convention is that the first is the most remote and the thirtieth the nearest. Crowley accordingly worked them in reverse, beginning at the thirtieth and ascending, which is why the numbering in his record runs down the page as the sequence goes up. A reader meeting a list that starts at TEX is looking at working order, not at a different numbering.

Crowley, 1900 and 1909

Almost everything said about the character of an individual Aethyr in modern circulation comes from Aleister Crowley. By his own account he began the series in Mexico in 1900 and completed it with Victor Neuburg in the Algerian desert in late 1909, and the record was published as The Vision and the Voice. Those descriptions are Crowley's visionary record of 1909, not Dee's, and they are not in the sixteenth-century diaries at all.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Addressed By

Disciplines That Use This

The thirty aethyrs of the Enochian system.

Member Of

One of the thirty Aethyrs of the Enochian scheme.

Sources
1. A True and Faithful Relation of What Passed for Many Years Between Dr. John Dee and Some Spirits
John Dee, edited by Meric Casaubon, T. Garthwait, 1659View the Source
2. The Magicians of the Golden Dawn: A Documentary History of a Magical Order 1887-1923
Ellic Howe, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1972on the order's foundation in 1888 and the composition of its knowledge lecturesView the Source
3. The Western Esoteric Traditions: A Historical Introduction
Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke, Oxford University Press, 2008the chapter on Crowley and Thelema, and on what the Golden Dawn passed to himView the Source
4. Liber Scientiae, Auxilii et Victoriae Terrestris
John Dee and Edward Kelley, 1585The tables of the ninety-one
Quote, The tables of the ninety-one
The Aethyr names, their ordering and the Governors assigned to each are given in the tabulation Dee compiled in May 1585 from sessions worked with Edward Kelley the previous year.
5. John Dee's Conversations with Angels: Cabala, Alchemy, and the End of Nature
Deborah E. Harkness, Cambridge University Press, 1999the chapters on the continental journey of 1583 to 1589View the Source
6. Mysteriorum Libri Quinque and Liber Loagaeth (British Library Sloane MSS 3188 and 3189)
John Dee and Edward Kelley, 1583Dee's manuscript record of the sessions and of the received namesView the Source
The Vision and the Voice (Liber CCCCXVIII, XXX Aerum vel Saeculi)
Aleister Crowley, The Equinox I(5), Special Supplement, privately printed, London, 1911The Cry of the Aethyrs
Quote, The Cry of the Aethyrs
Crowley scryed the thirty Aethyrs and published the record in 1911. Nearly all modern material on the Aethyrs derives from this work rather than from Dee, and it reverses Dee's ordering by working from the thirtieth inward to the first.
View the Source

Take a Related Quiz

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.