Home›Core Tenets›Knowledge and ReasonGroupKnowledge and ReasonCore tenets that state how religious truth can be known and what role reason, mysticism, direct experience or plain faith plays in knowing it. This includes tenets on the limits of human reason before the divine, the value of philosophical argument for or against a doctrine, the role of mystical or ecstatic experience as a source of knowledge, and doctrines that a truth is known only by revelation and cannot be reasoned to. A tenet about the content of what is known, such as the nature of the divine itself, is grouped under that content instead; this group holds tenets about the manner and possibility of knowing, not the knowledge's own subject matter.Browse ByComments (0)Reader Challenges (0)Browse ByAll Knowledge and ReasonKnowledge and Reason22 entriesKnowledge and ReasonFilter Results22 entriesStatus Within the TraditionAllBinding, without a formal definition (15)Genuinely disputed within the tradition (3)Rejected, or not held, within this tradition (4)Standard teaching, not formally defined (4)Origin Period Start YearAll1624 (1)1869 (1)Affirmation OfAllAnekantavada (1)The Two Truths (1)Category of BeliefAllCore Tenets (6)Cosmological Beliefs (1)Moral Precepts (2)TraditionAllAmerican Humanist Association (2)Chabad-Lubavitch (1)Digambara (1)Ethical Culture (1)Gelug (5)Humanists International (2)Ismailism (1)Jonang (2)Kagyu (1)Karma Kagyu (1)Madhyamaka (3)Mahayana (1)New Atheism (1)Nichiren (1)Nyingma (1)Quranism (1)Rinzai (1)Sakya (1)Shia (Twelver) (2)Shingon (1)Soto (1)Sunni (1)Svetambara (1)Tendai (2)Tiantai (2)Tibetan Buddhism (1)Vajrayana (1)Zaidiyyah (1)Zen (1)SubjectAllKnowledge and reason (22)ObligationAllObligatory (13)Show ResultsBrowseCompareSelect all 22Whether any god exists is unknown and may be unknowableCore Tenets2 linksReligious truth is known by reason, not revelationCore Tenets1 linkMiracles and revealed prophecy are not credibleCore Tenets3 linksThe two truths, conventional and ultimateCore Tenets17 linksFormal debate as a means of realizationCore Tenets1 linkThe threefold truth: emptiness, provisional existence and the middleCore Tenets4 linksThe middle way avoids both eternalism and annihilationismCore Tenets2 linksAql: Reason Stands Beside Quran, Sunna and Consensus as a Source of LawCore Tenets2 linksIstihsan: A Jurist May Set Aside a Strict Analogy for a Better RulingCore Tenets2 linksAl-Masalih al-Mursala: Unstated Public Benefit Is a Ground for RulingCore Tenets2 linksAnalogical Reasoning Is Not a Source of LawCore Tenets3 linksQiyas: Analogical Reasoning Is a Source of LawCore Tenets5 linksContemplative Prayer Worked Through the Faculties of Chochmah, Binah and DaatCore Tenets1 linkGood and Evil Are Knowable by ReasonCore Tenets5 linksGood and Evil Are Known Only Through RevelationCore Tenets2 linksJuristic Preference Is Not a Valid Source of LawCore Tenets1 linkAnekantavada (many-sidedness of truth)Cosmological Beliefs3 linksSelf-emptiness (rangtong): things are empty of their own inherent existenceCosmological Beliefs2 linksOther-emptiness (shentong): ultimate reality is empty of what is other than itselfCosmological Beliefs2 linksAll phenomena lack intrinsic nature (svabhava)Cosmological Beliefs2 linksBelief should be proportioned to the evidenceMoral Precepts7 linksFree inquiry must not be limited by dogma or authorityMoral Precepts4 linksComments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.