Hexagram Lines
The Army, Line 5
The Army
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
When game enters the field it is right to catch it, and command should rest with the elder, capable son rather than be shared with the inexperienced, or disorder follows even a just cause. This is the ruling position of the hexagram, yet it is occupied by a yielding rather than a firm line, which is exactly why command must be delegated to a genuinely capable hand rather than exercised by the ruler alone.
Facts
Lines
Traditional Line Numeral Learn More
Game in the Field, and the Right Commander
The fifth line occupies the ruling position of the hexagram, and its counsel returns directly to the question of authority the whole hexagram is built around. When game enters the field it is right to catch it, the line says, framing the campaign as a justified response to a real provocation rather than an unprovoked action, but it adds a pointed condition: command should rest with the elder, capable son rather than be shared with the inexperienced, or disorder follows even a just cause. This is a striking admission for the line occupying the ruler's own seat, that rightness of cause is not sufficient on its own, and that the ruler's proper role here is to recognize and defer to genuine capability rather than to exercise command personally or divide it among the untested.
Read together with line two, the sole firm line in the hexagram, this line effectively names where real authority belongs, the capable commander rather than the ruling position itself, and warns that even a fully justified campaign can still end in disorder if that authority is not concentrated correctly. The line's honesty about its own limitation is unusual within the sequence generally, where the ruling position is more often praised without qualification, and it marks Hexagram 7 as particularly concerned with the difference between holding authority and being fit to exercise it.
Command Delegated to Capability Rather Than Claimed by Position
Because the ruler at this line is yielding rather than firm, real command must be delegated to the one line in the hexagram capable of holding it, the firm second line. A yin stroke occupies the ruling position, a notable mismatch by the standard rule that expects firmness at this station, and the line text addresses that mismatch directly rather than concealing it. This is one of the clearer examples in the whole system of a hexagram naming its own structural imbalance and prescribing the remedy within the line text itself.
When this line changes, the central stroke of Kun becomes firm, turning the upper trigram into Kan, so that Kan now stands both above and below. The resulting hexagram is Number 29, The Abysmal, water doubled, an image of danger repeated and compounded rather than resolved. That the ruler's own weakness, if it changes without the capable hand described in the line text actually holding real authority, doubles the danger already present in the lower trigram rather than easing it, is a direct structural argument for exactly what the line insists on: command delegated to genuine capability, not asserted by right of position alone. This is one of the more direct structural warnings in the whole set of sixty four hexagrams, tying a specific delegation of authority to the avoidance of a specifically doubled danger rather than to any general moral principle.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Sources
Open Questions (1 open question)
Why does King Wen 7 line 5 paraphrase away the wagon of corpses that line 3 keeps?
King Wen 7 lines 3 and 5 contain the same two character phrase in the received Chinese text, the one usually rendered as carrying corpses in the wagon. The atlas keeps the image at line 3, whose description reads that the army may carry corpses in its wagons, and drops it at line 5, whose description reads only that disorder follows even a just cause. One phrase is therefore represented twice in two incompatible registers, and nothing on either page tells a reader that the underlying text is the same. Whether this was a deliberate reading or an accident of two passes is not recorded.
What would resolve this Checking the received text of King Wen 7 lines 3 and 5 against a critical edition, then deciding one way for both lines: either the concrete image is kept in both, or the reason for treating the two occurrences differently is stated on the page. Any correction touches a line description and is owner gated.
Sinology, specifically the textual history of the Zhou Yi.Divinity Atlas Open Questions Register, First Edition
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.