Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Historical Figures

Charlemagne

Rulers, Emperors & Monarchs

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

King of the Franks from 768 and, from Christmas Day 800, the first western emperor since the fifth century, crowned in Rome by Pope Leo III. His reign reorganised the western church by decree: liturgical books were corrected against Roman exemplars, cathedral and monastic schools were required, a legible new script was developed in his scriptoria, and a body of scholars was gathered at Aachen around the Northumbrian Alcuin. The same reign forced the baptism of the Saxons under a capitulary that made refusal a capital offence, which is part of the record and not a footnote to it.

Facts
Life
Lifespan or Floruit
c. 748-814 1
Place of Activity
The Frankish kingdom, with his principal residence and palace chapel at Aachen 1
Manner of Death
Died of natural causes 1
Died at Aachen in January 814 and was buried in his palace chapel
Office Held
King of the Franks from 768; King of the Lombards from 774; Emperor from 800 1
Disputed
Lifespan or Floruit
748 to 814 CE 1
The source marks this year circa, its own approximate estimate rather than a fixed date.
Place of Origin
Not established. Historians most often propose Herstal or Jupille, near Liege in present day Belgium, matching the region of his father Pepin's own family estates; Aachen, his later principal residence, has also been proposed. No contemporary record fixes a single site. 2
Attestation
Historicity
Historically attested 1
Attested by his own capitularies, by charters, and by a life written within about a decade of his death by Einhard, who had served at his court. Canonised in 1165 by the antipope Paschal III, so the cult was tolerated at Aachen and never extended to the universal church
Identity
Gender
Male 1
Learn More
The Coronation of 800 and What It Started

On Christmas Day 800, in Saint Peter's in Rome, Pope Leo III placed a crown on the king of the Franks and the assembled Romans acclaimed him emperor. Einhard, who knew him and wrote his life a decade or so after his death, reports that Charlemagne said afterwards he would not have entered the church that day had he known what the pope intended. Historians have argued about that remark ever since, because a ceremony of that scale is not improvised and because the claim of reluctance is exactly what a Frankish court would want on the record.

The difficulty was diplomatic before it was theological. There already was a Roman emperor, in Constantinople, and at that moment the throne was held by Irene, a woman, which western apologists used to argue the office was vacant. The eastern court did not accept the argument, and the matter was only settled in 812 when Byzantine envoys agreed to address Charlemagne as emperor without conceding that he was emperor of the Romans.

What the ceremony established in the West was more durable than the title. A pope had crowned an emperor, and the act could be read as a gift in the pope's hands. Later popes read it exactly that way, and later emperors read it as a formality confirming an authority they already held. The investiture disputes of the eleventh and twelfth centuries, and the political theology of the two swords, are arguments about what happened in that building on that morning.

Correctio: Standardising a Church by Capitulary

The Carolingian religious programme was administrative. The Admonitio Generalis of 789 is a long list of orders to bishops, abbots and counts: correct your books, teach the creed and the Lord's Prayer in a language the people understand, keep Sunday, stop the local abuses named here, and set up schools where boys can learn to read. It reads less like a sermon than an inspection report with instructions attached.

Behind it was a genuine textual problem. Liturgical books, bibles and canon law collections had drifted apart across centuries of local copying, and no two churches did the same thing in the same words. Charlemagne asked Rome for an authoritative sacramentary and received one, which his scholars then had to supplement because it was a papal book unsuited to ordinary parish use. Alcuin of York and others revised the biblical text, and the scriptoria developed a clear, spaced, minuscule hand that is the ancestor of the lower case letters on this page.

The same programme had a coercive edge that the reforms are often described without. The capitulary issued for the conquered Saxons made refusing baptism, eating meat in Lent and cremating the dead capital offences, and the campaign that enforced it lasted three decades. A later capitulary softened the terms after criticism from within his own court, Alcuin among the critics, who argued that faith is a matter of persuasion and that tithes were being demanded of people who had not been taught anything first.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

This source names Charlemagne directly: "the 795 elevation to archdiocese under Charlemagne, the prince-elector period, its 1803 secularization and the 1801 to 1824 vacancy."

This source names Charlemagne directly: "Barbero's academic biography of Charlemagne, translated from the Italian, giving one of the fullest modern treatments of the thirty two year Saxon campaign from 772 to 804, including the destruction..."

This source names Charlemagne directly: "Durer's circa 1512 portrait of Emperor Charlemagne, held by the Germanisches Nationalmuseum, Nuremberg, an imagined likeness since "no resemblance is known of Charlemagne," showing him crowned and..."

This source names Charlemagne directly: "hall, showing Pope Leo III crowning Charlemagne as emperor on 25 December 800."

This source names Charlemagne directly: "Nuremberg, for "The Emperor Charlemagne," a panel painting by Albrecht Durer of circa 1511 to 1513, giving the medium (lime wood panel), dimensions (215 by 115 centimetres), current location, and..."

Belongs to Tradition

Depicted In

Promulgated

Sources
1. The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised edition
F. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2005View the Source
2. Encyclopaedia Britannica (online academic reference)
Encyclopaedia Britannica editors, Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc., 2024View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.