Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Historical Figures

Jean-Francois Champollion

Also Known As Champollion le Jeune · Champollion
Historians, Ethnographers & Scholars of Religion

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The philologist who broke the Egyptian writing system, announcing in 1822 in his letter to Dacier that the hieroglyphs were neither purely symbolic nor purely alphabetic but a mixed script carrying phonetic signs. His decisive move was to treat Coptic, still in use as the liturgical language of the Egyptian church, as the surviving descendant of the language behind the script. Everything the atlas can say about Egyptian religion from Egyptian sources rather than from Greek ones dates from after his work.

Facts
Origins
Place of Origin
Figeac, France 1
Defining Moment
In 1822 he showed that Egyptian hieroglyphs record sounds as well as ideas, which opened the funerary and temple literature of Egypt to reading for the first time in fourteen centuries. 1
Attestation
Historicity
Historically attested 1
Life
Lifespan or Floruit
1790 to 1832 1
Identity
Gender
Male 1
Learn More
The Decipherment, Step by Step

The Rosetta Stone gave the same decree in Greek, in demotic and in hieroglyphs, and it did not by itself unlock the script. Thomas Young had already shown that the cartouches held royal names and that those names were written with signs used for their sounds, which was real progress, but it left the assumption in place that phonetic writing was a device reserved for foreign words: Greek and Roman names had to be spelled out, while Egyptian was thought to be written in symbols standing for ideas.

Champollion broke that assumption in 1822 by applying the same reading to cartouches of native kings copied from Abu Simbel and elsewhere. Taking the sign of the sun, whose name he knew from Coptic as re, followed by signs he could already read, he arrived at Ramesses, and by a comparable route at Thutmose. That showed phonetic signs were being used for Egyptian words, which meant the script was mixed, phonetic and semantic together, and that it recorded a language rather than encoding concepts. He announced it in a letter addressed to the secretary of the Academy of Inscriptions and set out the system two years later. The key that made it work was Coptic, the descendant of Egyptian still in use as the liturgical language of the Egyptian church, which he had learned for the purpose.

Why a Decipherment Is a Religious Event

Before 1822 the religion of Egypt was known almost entirely at second hand, through Greek and Roman writers who described it from outside, and through a late work called the Hieroglyphica attributed to Horapollo, which explained each sign as a symbol of an idea. That book was the basis on which Renaissance scholars, Athanasius Kircher among them, built elaborate mystical readings of inscriptions they could not read at all, and behind those readings lay a much older European conviction that Egypt held a wisdom encoded in pictures. The conviction is itself an important object in the history of Western esotericism, and it was resting on a mistake about how writing works.

Afterwards the Egyptians could be heard. The Pyramid Texts, the coffin inscriptions, the collections of spells that a modern reader knows as the Book of the Dead, the temple rituals, the hymns to the sun, the letters written to dead relatives: all of it became legible in the language it was composed in. Almost everything the atlas records about Egyptian religion from Egyptian evidence rather than from Greek report dates from after this work, and the hermetic tradition that had been built on the symbolic assumption had to decide what to do about it.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Coptic was his key: he treated the church's liturgical language as the living descendant of the language written in hieroglyphs.

Studied

The language behind the hieroglyphic script, which his 1822 reading opened.

In the Other Atlases
Sources
1. The Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Egypt
Donald B. Redford (ed.), Oxford University Press, 2001View the Source
A Coptic Grammar, with Chrestomathy and Glossary: Sahidic Dialect
Bentley Layton, Harrassowitz Verlag, 2004View the Source
Two Thousand Years of Coptic Christianity
Otto F. A. Meinardus, American University in Cairo Press, 1999View the Source
The Ancient Egyptian Book of the Dead
Raymond O. Faulkner (translator); Carol Andrews (editor), British Museum Press, 1985View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.