Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Scholarly Discipline

Sanskrit Philology

Humanities
Origin from 1786

Sanskrit texts read through comparative grammatical analysis and manuscript collation for their most plausible original meaning. Founded in 1786, when William Jones's Third Anniversary Discourse to the Asiatic Society argued Sanskrit, Greek and Latin shared a common ancestor, founding comparative Indo-European linguistics.

Facts
Method
Method
comparative grammatical analysis of Sanskrit against Greek, Latin and other ancient languages, and manuscript collation to establish a passage's most plausible original meaning and textual history 2
Subject
Subject
the language and textual transmission of Sanskrit literature from the Vedas onward, and how a Sanskrit passage's text and meaning have varied across manuscripts 2
Identity
Field Category
Humanities 1
Parent Field
Philology 1
Origins
Emerged As Named Discipline
from 1786 2
Learn More
Jones Addresses the Asiatic Society and Names a Lost Common Ancestor

Sanskrit philology studies the language and textual transmission of Sanskrit literature from the Vedas onward, establishing what a passage most plausibly meant in its original context and how its text has varied across manuscripts. The British judge and orientalist William Jones delivered his Third Anniversary Discourse to the Asiatic Society in Calcutta on 2 February 1786, arguing that Sanskrit bore too strong a structural resemblance to Greek and Latin, in verb roots and grammatical forms, for the likeness to be accidental, and that all three must have sprung from a common source that no longer existed, the founding statement of comparative Indo-European linguistics.

Jones's discourse gave Sanskrit philology both its founding method, systematic grammatical comparison rather than casual resemblance, and its larger significance beyond India alone, since establishing Sanskrit's place in a documented language family is what lets scholars date and cross check Vedic and later Sanskrit religious texts against a much wider comparative record. The atlas relies on Sanskrit philology wherever a Vedic, Puranic or classical Sanskrit passage's precise meaning or textual history bears on a claim about early Hindu or Buddhist doctrine.

Scholarly Disciplines of Sanskrit Philology
Connections

Branch Of

Source Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental DevelopmentOECD

Open Questions Needing This

Source Encyclopedia of HinduismDenise Cush, Catherine Robinson and Michael York (eds.)
Sources
1. Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development
OECD, OECD Publishing, 2015View the Source
2. The Oxford Introduction to Proto-Indo-European and the Proto-Indo-European World
J. P. Mallory and D. Q. Adams, Oxford University Press, 2006
Divinity Atlas Scholarly Discipline Register
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.