Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Scholarly Discipline

Tibetology

Humanities
Origin from 1834

The Tibetan Buddhist canon read in classical Tibetan rather than through Mongol or Chinese intermediary translation, founded by Alexander Csoma de Koros's 1834 grammar and dictionary built from monastic sources. Gives the atlas direct access to primary Tibetan canonical texts.

Facts
Subject
Subject
the Tibetan Buddhist canon and its commentarial literature, read in classical Tibetan rather than through Mongol, Chinese or later secondhand transmission 2
Method
Method
philological study of classical Tibetan Buddhist canonical and commentarial texts, supported by dedicated grammar and dictionary tools built specifically for the language 2
Identity
Field Category
Humanities 1
Parent Field
Buddhist Studies 1
Origins
Emerged As Named Discipline
from 1834 2
Learn More
A Hungarian Scholar Walks to Tibet and Builds the First Dictionary

Tibetology studies Tibetan Buddhist canonical and commentarial literature philologically, reading classical Tibetan directly rather than relying on Mongol, Chinese or later European secondhand summary of Tibetan Buddhism. The Hungarian scholar Alexander Csoma de Koros, who had traveled overland toward Central Asia searching for the origins of the Hungarian people and ended up studying in Ladakhi monasteries instead, published the field's founding tools in 1834, a Tibetan English grammar and dictionary compiled directly from monastic sources, giving European scholarship its first reliable access to the Tibetan Buddhist canon in its own language.

Tibetan Buddhism's doctrinal and ritual literature is vast and was, before Csoma's dictionary, accessible to outside scholarship mainly through later Mongol or Chinese intermediary texts that had already reshaped it in transmission. Tibetology gives the atlas direct philological access to the Tibetan canon itself, letting a claim about Tibetan Buddhist doctrine or practice be checked against the primary Tibetan language sources rather than against a text that has already passed through another tradition's translation and interpretation, each step of which risks losing or reshaping a term with no exact equivalent outside Tibetan.

Connections

Associated With

Mongols, Cultures

This source names Mongols directly: "The Tibetan Buddhist canon read in classical Tibetan rather than through Mongol or Chinese intermediary translation, founded by Alexander Csoma de Koros's 1834 grammar and dictionary built from..."

Source Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental DevelopmentOECD

Branch Of

Source Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental DevelopmentOECD

Open Questions Needing This

Sources
1. Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development
OECD, OECD Publishing, 2015View the Source
2. The Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism
Robert E. Buswell Jr. and Donald S. Lopez Jr., Princeton University Press, 2014View the Source
Divinity Atlas Scholarly Discipline Register
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.