Origin from 1834
The Tibetan Buddhist canon read in classical Tibetan rather than through Mongol or Chinese intermediary translation, founded by Alexander Csoma de Koros's 1834 grammar and dictionary built from monastic sources. Gives the atlas direct access to primary Tibetan canonical texts.
Facts
Subject
Subjectthe Tibetan Buddhist canon and its commentarial literature, read in classical Tibetan rather than through Mongol, Chinese or later secondhand transmission 2 Method
Methodphilological study of classical Tibetan Buddhist canonical and commentarial texts, supported by dedicated grammar and dictionary tools built specifically for the language 2 Identity
Field Category Parent Field Origins
Emerged As Named Discipline Learn More
A Hungarian Scholar Walks to Tibet and Builds the First Dictionary
Tibetology studies Tibetan Buddhist canonical and commentarial literature philologically, reading classical Tibetan directly rather than relying on Mongol, Chinese or later European secondhand summary of Tibetan Buddhism. The Hungarian scholar Alexander Csoma de Koros, who had traveled overland toward Central Asia searching for the origins of the Hungarian people and ended up studying in Ladakhi monasteries instead, published the field's founding tools in 1834, a Tibetan English grammar and dictionary compiled directly from monastic sources, giving European scholarship its first reliable access to the Tibetan Buddhist canon in its own language.
Tibetan Buddhism's doctrinal and ritual literature is vast and was, before Csoma's dictionary, accessible to outside scholarship mainly through later Mongol or Chinese intermediary texts that had already reshaped it in transmission. Tibetology gives the atlas direct philological access to the Tibetan canon itself, letting a claim about Tibetan Buddhist doctrine or practice be checked against the primary Tibetan language sources rather than against a text that has already passed through another tradition's translation and interpretation, each step of which risks losing or reshaping a term with no exact equivalent outside Tibetan.
Connections
Associated With
This source names Mongols directly: "The Tibetan Buddhist canon read in classical Tibetan rather than through Mongol or Chinese intermediary translation, founded by Alexander Csoma de Koros's 1834 grammar and dictionary built from..."
Source Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental DevelopmentOECD
Branch Of
Source Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental DevelopmentOECD
Open Questions Needing This
Source Introduction to Tibetan BuddhismJohn Powers
Sources
1. Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development
2. The Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism
Robert E. Buswell Jr. and Donald S. Lopez Jr., Princeton University Press, 2014View the Source Divinity Atlas Scholarly Discipline Register
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.