Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Miracles

The Guadalupe Tilma

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The claim that an image of the Virgin Mary appeared miraculously on the cactus-fiber cloak, or tilma, of Juan Diego, and that the cloth has survived nearly five centuries without the deterioration expected of its fiber. Distinct from the religious event covering the Guadalupe apparitions narrative, this entry covers the physical relic itself: what a 1979 infrared study found in the image, and what the documentary historian Stafford Poole found, and did not find, in the written record.

Facts
Disputed
Investigation Verdict
Philip Callahan's 1979 infrared study reported no underdrawing, sizing or varnish across the image's original figure, while identifying the moon, gold rays and angel as later painted additions. 2
Philip S. Callahan's The Tilma Under Infra-Red Radiation (Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate, CARA Studies on Popular Devotion, vol. II, Guadalupan Studies no. 3, 1981) is a technical infrared imaging study of the Guadalupe tilma. The method is infrared reflectography, a standard art-conservation technique that can reveal an underdrawing, the preparatory sketch an artist makes before painting, if one is present beneath the visible paint layer. Callahan's imaging found no underdrawing on the tilma's image. Proponents of the image's traditional origin cite the absence as evidence against ordinary painted production, since a conventional painting is normally expected to show one. Conservators and Callahan's own study both note the caveat that infrared analysis cannot rule out lost, unconventional or since-degraded techniques that would leave no underdrawing detectable, so the absence establishes only that none survives to be found, not by itself how or when the image was produced.
Skeptical Explanation
Stafford Poole's documentary history finds no reference to the apparition and Juan Diego narrative before 1649, and traces the Antonio Valeriano attribution to a claim made eighty years after his death. 3
The traditional account of Our Lady of Guadalupe rests on the Nahuatl-language Nican Mopohua narrative of the 1531 apparition to Juan Diego, but the earliest surviving copies of that text and the documentary record around the shrine's early history do not appear until decades after the claimed date. Stafford Poole's Our Lady of Guadalupe: The Origins and Sources of a Mexican National Symbol, 1531-1797 (University of Arizona Press, 1995) is a critical scholarly history examining that documentary record. The method is documentary and historical-critical, tracing the earliest datable manuscripts, church records and contemporary accounts referencing the apparition or the image and comparing their dates against the claimed 1531 event. Poole's findings concern this documentary history of the story and its sources specifically, not the physical tilma itself; they neither address nor are addressed by Philip Callahan's separate infrared study of the cloth, a different kind of evidence entirely.
The Claim
The Claim
Catholic tradition holds that an image of the Virgin Mary appeared miraculously on Juan Diego's cactus-fiber cloak in December 1531, and that the cloth has survived nearly five centuries without the expected deterioration of its fiber. 1Tradition: Mexican folk Catholicism
Learn More
The Cloth and the Tradition

Catholic tradition holds that in December 1531 the Virgin Mary appeared to an indigenous convert, Juan Diego, at Tepeyac near Mexico City, and that when he gathered roses at her instruction and carried them in his cloak to the bishop, Juan de Zumarraga, as proof, the roses fell away to reveal an image of the Virgin imprinted on the cloth itself. The cloak, called a tilma, was woven from maguey, or agave, fiber, a material conservators generally expect to degrade within a few decades under normal conditions. It is displayed today at the Basilica of Guadalupe in Mexico City, one of the most visited Catholic shrines in the world, and venerated as the original, unrestored image.

The earliest surviving published telling of the story, a Nahuatl language text called the Nican Mopohua, appeared in 1649, within a larger work called the Huei tlamahuicoltica, printed by Luis Lasso de la Vega, more than a century after the events it describes. Devotional tradition attributes the Nican Mopohua's composition to the indigenous scholar Antonio Valeriano, writing decades earlier than its printing. The image itself combines elements later writers have read as drawn from the Book of Revelation, a woman clothed with the sun and the moon under her feet, alongside visual conventions familiar to its earliest indigenous audience, a blending some take as evidence of deliberate cultural bridging, whatever view is taken of the image's origin.

Two Separate Investigations

In 1979 the biophysicist Philip Callahan photographed and scanned the tilma under infrared light and published his findings through the Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate. He reported no underdrawing, sizing or varnish of the kind expected in a conventional painting across the original figure, while also identifying several elements, the moon beneath the figure's feet, the gold rays, the supporting angel, as later additions painted over that original image by a different hand. The absence of underdrawing does not by itself establish how the image was made; infrared analysis alone cannot rule out lost or unconventional painting techniques, and Callahan's own background was in entomology and infrared photography rather than art conservation.

Working from an entirely different kind of evidence, the historian Stafford Poole's documentary study traces every known written reference to devotion at Tepeyac from the 1570s onward, and finds none that mentions the apparition and Juan Diego story until the Nican Mopohua's appearance in 1649. Poole also shows that the attribution of that text to Antonio Valeriano rests on a claim made by a different writer more than eighty years after Valeriano's death, not on anything Lasso de la Vega himself says about its authorship. Poole's findings concern the documentary history of the narrative, not the physical cloth, and the two investigations, physical and documentary, answer different questions without directly contradicting each other.

Sources The Tilma Under Infra-Red RadiationPhilip S. Callahan with Our Lady of Guadalupe: The Origins and Sources of a Mexican National Symbol, 1531-1797Stafford Poole

Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Juan Diego, Figures

The tilma was his cloak.

Where the tilma is displayed and venerated.

The apparition narrative this relic is presented as evidence for; what is described here is the physical image and its investigation, not the narrative.

Related To

Miracles, Doctrines

The doctrine is the general treatment of miracle claims across traditions; what is described here is one specific claim.

Sources
1. Huei tlamahuicoltica (the Nican Mopohua)
Luis Lasso de la Vega (compiler); traditional attribution in part to Antonio Valeriano is contested, Mexico City, 1649The Nican Mopohua, 1649
2. The Tilma Under Infra-Red Radiation
Philip S. Callahan, Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate (CARA Studies on Popular Devotion, vol. II, Guadalupan Studies, no. 3), 1981Throughout
3. Our Lady of Guadalupe: The Origins and Sources of a Mexican National Symbol, 1531-1797
Stafford Poole, University of Arizona Press, 1995Documentary chronology
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.