Mythical Creatures
Ghost
Ghosts
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Ghost is the general name for the part of a dead person that is held to remain and to be met by the living, a belief attested in every region this atlas covers and in no two of them the same. What varies is not the fact of the belief but everything around it: whether the dead are dangerous or dependent, whether they are fed or dismissed, and whether the remedy is a funeral rite, an exorcism or a spade. The particular forms are the entries gathered under this heading, and the general word is kept only as a way in to them.
Facts
Disputed
Attributes and IconographyTylor's comparative survey finds no single cross-cultural form, but recurring elements across many societies: a shadow, a breath or mist, or an insubstantial double of the living body, thin enough to pass through solid matter. 1Tradition: Primitive Culture Ghost iconography varies enormously by culture; Tylor catalogues recurring elements rather than a single settled form, and no consensus image exists across the traditions he surveys. Attestation
HistoricityNot a historical person: a divine or other-than-human being 1 Meaning in the Attesting SourceEdward Burnett Tylor's theory of animism proposed ghost belief arose from early explanations of dreams, shadows and the difference between the living and the dead body. 1 Origins
Origin of the NameFrom Old English gast, spirit or breath, cognate with German Geist. 1 Function
Domain / FunctionAs a general category, ghost belief spans an enormous range across cultures, from ancestral spirits owed continuing ritual care to malevolent dead who return out of unfinished grievance. 1 Text
Source TextTylor's Primitive Culture argues animistic ghost belief as the root of religion generally, a nineteenth century theory that later anthropology has qualified rather than simply accepted. 1 Learn More
A Category Almost Every Culture Independently Reached
Belief in the persisting, sometimes visible or audible spirit of the dead is close to a human universal, appearing in societies with no historical contact with one another and taking forms specific enough to their own culture that the many named entries elsewhere in this atlas, from the Chinese gui to the Norse draugr to the Jamaican duppy, are better understood as regional elaborations of this same underlying idea than as unrelated inventions.
Edward Burnett Tylor's nineteenth-century anthropological work on animism, one of the foundational texts of comparative religious studies, proposed that belief in souls and ghosts arose from early human attempts to explain dreams, shadows, reflections and the visible difference between a living and a dead body, a theory that remains influential, if contested and refined, in the modern anthropology of religion. What varies enormously across cultures is not whether ghosts exist as a concept but what a ghost is for: a moral warning, an unresolved family obligation, a source of forbidden knowledge, or simply an acknowledgement that death does not always fully sever a person's presence from the community and places they belonged to in life.
What Ties the Named Ghosts of This Atlas Together
Read across the specific figures gathered elsewhere under this generic entry, a small number of recurring structural patterns emerge regardless of the culture of origin. A ghost is very often the product of a death that went wrong in a specific, nameable way, violent, sudden, unmourned, unmarried, or improperly buried, rather than an arbitrary supernatural intrusion, which is why funerary ritual across cultures as different as Chinese ancestor veneration, Roman Parentalia and Hindu shraddha offerings is so consistently framed as the primary defence against a troubled afterlife.
A second pattern is that the remedy for a dangerous ghost is usually not combat but correction: settling a debt, completing a rite, or naming and honouring a grievance, which places the ghost figure closer to unfinished business made visible than to a monster in the modern horror sense. Comparative religious scholarship, including the broad synthesis found in the Encyclopedia of Religion, treats the ghost as one of the clearest windows available into how a given culture actually thinks death should be handled, since what a society fears in its dead reveals what it expects of the living toward them.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Instances
One of the named forms the general belief in the returning dead takes.
One of the named forms the general belief in the returning dead takes.
One of the named forms the general belief in the returning dead takes.
One of the named forms the general belief in the returning dead takes.
One of the named forms the general belief in the returning dead takes.
One of the named forms the general belief in the returning dead takes.
One of the named forms the general belief in the returning dead takes.
One of the named forms the general belief in the returning dead takes.
One of the named forms the general belief in the returning dead takes.
One of the named forms the general belief in the returning dead takes.
One of the named forms the general belief in the returning dead takes.
One of the named forms the general belief in the returning dead takes.
One of the named forms the general belief in the returning dead takes.
One of the named forms the general belief in the returning dead takes.
One of the named forms the general belief in the returning dead takes.
One of the named forms the general belief in the returning dead takes.
One of the named forms the general belief in the returning dead takes.
One of the named forms the general belief in the returning dead takes.
One of the named forms the general belief in the returning dead takes.
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.