Mythical Creatures
Wyvern
Dragons
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
The wyvern is a heraldic category rather than a creature with a mythology. European armory distinguishes a dragon, which has four legs, from a wyvern, which has two legs and wings and a barbed tail, and the distinction is a rule of blazon developed by English heralds; French and continental practice does not always keep it, and medieval artists routinely drew two-legged dragons without meaning anything by it. The name derives from the Old French wivre, from Latin vipera. It has no cycle of stories of its own: where a wyvern appears in legend it is doing a dragon's work, and its interest lies in the history of coats of arms rather than in belief.
Facts
Attestation
HistoricityLegendary: known from narrative tradition, not the historical record 2 Legendary; a heraldic form rather than a narrative creature Meaning in the Attesting SourceTwo legs, wings and a barbed tail distinguish it from a four-legged dragon 2 Function
Domain / FunctionAs a heraldic device the wyvern became associated in England with valor and military service, borne on the arms of several noble families and used, distinct from the dragon proper in formal blazon, as an emblem on regimental insignia into the modern period. 1 Origins
Origin of the NameFrom Old French wivre, ultimately from Latin vipera 2 Contested Use
Contested or Appropriated Modern UseFrench and continental heraldry do not always keep the two-legged distinction 2 Cult
Attributes and IconographyHeraldic convention distinguishes the wyvern from the four legged dragon by giving it only two legs and a barbed, often knotted tail, typically shown winged and used as a charge on numerous European coats of arms from the medieval period onward. 3 Learn More
A Rule of Heraldry, Not a Myth
The wyvern is a category of heraldry rather than a creature with a mythology of its own. English and continental armory came to distinguish a dragon, which in strict blazon has four legs, from a wyvern, which has two legs, a pair of wings and a knotted, barbed tail, a distinction developed by heralds from the later Middle Ages, not a difference recognised in older dragon-lore, where the two were not separated.
The word derives, through Old French wivre, from Latin vipera, "viper," pointing to its serpentine root. As a charge the wyvern signifies strength and endurance and, sometimes, war or pestilence, and it appears in the arms of English and Welsh families and towns; the red dragon of Wales (Y Ddraig Goch) is technically a wyvern in form. Because it is defined by blazon, the wyvern has no birth-story, no habitat and no legend attached to it as such, it is a way of drawing a two-legged winged dragon, given a name and a set of rules, and its recent prominence in fantasy gaming has treated that heraldic distinction as though it were a species.
Heraldry Is a Grammar, Not a Bestiary
The wyvern is not a folk creature that heralds happened to draw. It is a term in a technical vocabulary. Blazon, the language in which coats of arms are described, has to be exact enough that two artists working from the same words produce the same shield, so it distinguishes creatures by countable features. A dragon has four legs. A wyvern has two, with wings, and a barbed tail. That is the whole of the difference and it is a difference of description rather than of nature.
English practice hardened the distinction more than Continental practice did. In much European heraldry the two-legged form is simply what a dragon looks like, and the separate word is unnecessary. This is why medieval texts that mention dragons cannot be sorted into wyverns and dragons: the category did not exist when they were written and was applied afterwards.
The device has had a long civic life. A winged two-legged beast appears as a standard associated with Wessex and is used to this day by regiments, councils and clubs across the English west and midlands, and it is on the arms of several cities. Its modern visibility in games and fantasy fiction, where it is usually a smaller and less intelligent dragon, is drawn from heraldic illustration rather than from any narrative tradition, because there is no narrative tradition to draw from.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Derived From
The wyvern is a heraldic form, two-legged and barbed-tailed, distinguished from the four-legged dragon by armorial convention rather than by any story.
Sources
1. Man, Myth and Magic
Richard Cavendish (ed.), Marshall Cavendish, 1970on heraldic and folkloric dragons, the wyvern's heraldic useView the Source 1. Man, Myth and Magic
Richard Cavendish (ed.), Marshall Cavendish, 1970on heraldic and folkloric dragonsView the Source 2. Physiologus
Anonymous (Physiologus tradition), University of Texas Press, 1979View the Source 3. Encyclopedia of Religion
Mircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.), Macmillan Reference, 2005on dragons and heraldic beasts, the wyvern/dragon distinctionView the Source 3. Encyclopedia of Religion
Mircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.), Macmillan Reference, 2005on dragons and heraldic beastsView the Source Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.