Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Numbers

118

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin 1908 to 1965

One hundred and eighteen is 2 x 59. It has no symbolic tradition of any kind. Its modern association is with the periodic table, which since the naming of oganesson in 2016 runs to a hundred and eighteen elements; that is a fact about the state of synthesis rather than about the number, and it is expected to change. In digit-reduction numerology it reduces to 1.

Facts
Origins
Origin Period
1908 to 1965 1
Origin Period
500 BCE to 300 CE 2
Origin Period
The arithmological reading of the first numbers, one as source, two as division, four as justice, seven as virgin, ten as completion, reaches us through Platonic and Neopythagorean writers of the centuries after Plato. Burkert's finding is that it cannot be traced to Pythagoras himself, whose activity was religious rather than mathematical: the doctrines were credited backwards to him. 2Tradition: Pythagorean and Neopythagorean number lore
Origin Period
The system that gives a number a personality, and a person a number, was assembled in the United States in the first half of the twentieth century out of New Thought material. Balliett's The Philosophy of Numbers appeared in 1908; the chart positions, pinnacles and cycles were added by her successors over the next fifty years. 1Tradition: Modern name numerology (Mrs. L. Dow Balliett and her successors)
Place of Origin
The Greek world, and above all the Greek cities of southern Italy where the Pythagorean societies were established; the arithmological literature itself is later and largely eastern Mediterranean. 2Tradition: Pythagorean and Neopythagorean number lore
Place of Origin
The United States, and specifically the New Thought circuit of the north-eastern seaboard; Balliett worked from Atlantic City. 1Tradition: Modern name numerology (Mrs. L. Dow Balliett and her successors)
Attributed Author / Compiler
Attributed by the tradition to Pythagoras. Burkert's study is the standard demonstration that the number-doctrines carrying his name are the work of later hands, and that almost nothing in them can be shown to go back to the sixth century BCE. The attribution is recorded because it is what the tradition says, not because it holds. 2Tradition: Pythagorean and Neopythagorean number lore
Attributed Author / Compiler
Mrs. L. Dow Balliett, who published the first version of the modern system in 1908 and to whom Dudley devotes a chapter. What later authors added, the pinnacles, the challenges, the cycles, the personal year, is theirs, and this atlas's own numerology-position entries cite four different authors between 1908 and 1965 for what is presented as one system. 1Tradition: Modern name numerology (Mrs. L. Dow Balliett and her successors)
Origin of the Name
Pythagorean numerology is a twentieth-century label. The system it names has no demonstrable descent from Pythagoras, from the Pythagorean societies, or from the ancient arithmological literature; the letter-value chart it rests on was drawn up in the United States after 1900. The name borrows a pedigree, the oldest move in the subject. 1Tradition: Modern name numerology (Mrs. L. Dow Balliett and her successors)
Status
Standing as a Comparative Category
Largely abandoned as a comparative category 1
Contested Use
Contested or Appropriated Modern Use
Numerology has been sold since Balliett as a basis for decisions: which name to take, which date to marry on, which house number to buy. Dudley's survey of what numerologists sell is the standard critical account and its finding is blunt, numbers have power over minds, not over events. These entries record what the tradition says, not advice. 1
Modern Numerology
Reduction in the Modern System
The modern system reduces every number above nine by adding its digits: 1 + 1 + 8 = 10, then 1 + 0 = 1. Whatever the system says of 118 it therefore says of 1, because it holds no separate doctrine for the higher numbers. The stated exceptions are 11, 22 and 33, which it leaves unreduced and calls master numbers. 1Tradition: Modern name numerology (Mrs. L. Dow Balliett and her successors)
Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting Source
Psalm 118 closes the Hallel, the six psalms of praise, 113 to 118, sung at Passover and other pilgrim festivals, and its verse This is the day the LORD has made is among the most quoted lines of the Psalter. 3
Learn More
The Centre of the Bible, Checked

A hundred and eighteen is twice fifty-nine and reduces to ten and then one. Its fame rests on a much-forwarded modern claim: that Psalm 118 is the middle chapter of the Bible, that Psalm 117 is the shortest chapter and Psalm 119 the longest, and that the exact centre falls at Psalm 118:8, It is better to trust in the Lord than to put confidence in man, offered as a hidden design. The claim can be checked. The counts depend entirely on chapter divisions, which are a medieval addition made by Stephen Langton around 1200 and not part of the original text, so any centre they produce is an artefact of that later scheme.

In chemistry, a hundred and eighteen is the atomic number of oganesson, named in 2016 after the physicist Yuri Oganessian, one of only two elements, with seaborgium, named for a scientist still living at the time it was named; it was first synthesised in 2002 at the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research in Dubna, Russia.

The whole apparatus of digit-reduction numerology is a twentieth-century invention rather than an inheritance from antiquity. Mrs. L. Dow Balliett published the first systematic version, The Philosophy of Numbers, in 1908, fixing the letter-to-number chart still used today and ruling that eleven and twenty-two must stand as master numbers rather than reduce further; her colleague, the physician Julia Seton, is credited with coining the word numerology itself around 1912.

Why the Claim Does Not Hold

The tidy story also does not survive the arithmetic. The Protestant Bible has 1,189 chapters, whose true midpoint is the 595th, and depending on how one counts, that is Psalm 117 rather than 118; the popular version quietly adjusts the tally to land on the verse it wants. Psalm 117 being the shortest chapter and Psalm 119 the longest is true, but their flanking a supposed exact centre is a coincidence dressed up as design. The example is a useful one: it shows how a chain of individually near-true statements can be assembled into a false conclusion, and why claims of hidden numerical structure in scripture repay checking rather than repetition.

A hundred and eighteen factors as 2 x 59 and carries 4 divisors in all. Summing its proper divisors gives only 62, short of the number itself, which places it among the deficient numbers in the same classical scheme.

The genuine Pythagorean number philosophy that this modern chart borrows its name from left no writings of its own: Pythagoras and his early followers taught only by mouth, and what survives of their number theory comes instead through Nicomachus of Gerasa, whose Introduction to Arithmetic of the first century CE became the standard authority for a thousand years, and through Iamblichus, who drew on Nicomachus two centuries later; neither wrote anything resembling a name-and-birthdate numerology.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Disciplines That Use This

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
Sources
1. Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras Wrought
Underwood Dudley, Mathematical Association of America (Spectrum series), 1997View the Source
2. Weisheit und Wissenschaft: Studien zu Pythagoras, Philolaos und Platon (Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism)
Walter Burkert, Harvard University Press, 1962View the Source
3. The Holy Bible
Anonymous (multiple authors), Robert Barker, 1611Psalm 118; the medieval chapter divisionsView the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.