Numbers
20
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Origin 1908 to 1965
Twenty is a number of awakening, cooperation, and the call to a higher purpose. Made of two and zero, it takes the partnership and sensitivity of the two and deepens it with the amplifying, spiritual charge of zero, reducing to the root vibration two, the essence of partnership and balance raised to a more receptive and intuitive pitch. In tarot it is Judgement, card twenty, the trumpet-call of resurrection and awakening, the summons to rise renewed and answer a greater calling. Its keywords are awakening, cooperation, renewal, and the response to a higher summons. As a compound number twenty magnifies the diplomatic, feeling nature of two through the depth of zero, gifted in relationship and attuned to the unseen, called to serve through sensitivity and to answer when a new purpose calls.
Facts
Origins
Origin Period1908 to 1965 1Tradition: Modern name numerology (Mrs. L. Dow Balliett and her successors) Origin Period500 BCE to 300 CE 2Tradition: Pythagorean and Neopythagorean number lore Origin PeriodThe arithmological reading of the first numbers, one as source, two as division, four as justice, seven as virgin, ten as completion, reaches us through Platonic and Neopythagorean writers of the centuries after Plato. Burkert's finding is that it cannot be traced to Pythagoras himself, whose activity was religious rather than mathematical: the doctrines were credited backwards to him. 2 Origin PeriodThe system that gives a number a personality, and a person a number, was assembled in the United States in the first half of the twentieth century out of New Thought material. Balliett's The Philosophy of Numbers appeared in 1908; the chart positions, pinnacles and cycles were added by her successors over the next fifty years. 1 Place of OriginThe Greek world, and above all the Greek cities of southern Italy where the Pythagorean societies were established; the arithmological literature itself is later and largely eastern Mediterranean. 2Tradition: Pythagorean and Neopythagorean number lore Place of OriginThe United States, and specifically the New Thought circuit of the north-eastern seaboard; Balliett worked from Atlantic City. 1Tradition: Modern name numerology (Mrs. L. Dow Balliett and her successors) Attributed Author / CompilerAttributed by the tradition to Pythagoras. Burkert's study is the standard demonstration that the number-doctrines carrying his name are the work of later hands, and that almost nothing in them can be shown to go back to the sixth century BCE. The attribution is recorded because it is what the tradition says, not because it holds. 2Tradition: Pythagorean and Neopythagorean number lore Attributed Author / CompilerMrs. L. Dow Balliett, who published the first version of the modern system in 1908 and to whom Dudley devotes a chapter. What later authors added, the pinnacles, the challenges, the cycles, the personal year, is theirs, and this atlas's own numerology-position entries cite four different authors between 1908 and 1965 for what is presented as one system. 1Tradition: Modern name numerology (Mrs. L. Dow Balliett and her successors) Origin of the NamePythagorean numerology is a twentieth-century label. The system it names has no demonstrable descent from Pythagoras, from the Pythagorean societies, or from the ancient arithmological literature; the letter-value chart it rests on was drawn up in the United States after 1900. The name borrows a pedigree, the oldest move in the subject. 1Tradition: Modern name numerology (Mrs. L. Dow Balliett and her successors) Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting SourceBoth the wilderness census in Numbers and the half shekel levy in Exodus set twenty years old as the threshold of accountability, the age from which a man is counted among those fit for war and liable for the sanctuary tax. Below twenty a person is not yet counted at all in these reckonings. 3Tradition: Hebrew Bible (Numbers and Exodus, the census age of accountability) Meaning in the Attesting SourceMaya counting and calendrics run on a base of twenty rather than ten, visible in the day names of the two hundred and sixty day Tzolk'in and in the vigesimal place values of Maya numerals. The base is generally tied to counting on fingers and toes together, but its use is inseparable from the ritual calendar it structures. 4Tradition: Mesoamerican calendrics Status
Standing as a Comparative CategoryLargely abandoned as a comparative category 1 Modern Numerology
Reduction in the Modern SystemThe modern system reduces every number above nine by adding its digits: 2 + 1 = 3. Whatever the system says of 21 it therefore says of 3, which its own description already states directly ("reduces to the root vibration three"), because it holds no separate doctrine for the higher numbers. The stated exceptions are 11, 22 and 33, which it leaves unreduced and calls master numbers. 1 Contested Use
Contested or Appropriated Modern UseNumerology has been sold since Balliett as a basis for decisions: which name to take, which date to marry on, which house number to buy. Dudley's survey of what numerologists sell is the standard critical account and its finding is blunt, numbers have power over minds, not over events. These entries record what the tradition says, not advice. 1 Learn More
Counting by Twenties
Twenty is the score, and in several cultures it was a counting base in its own right. The Maya reckoned in twenties, their calendar naming twenty days, and traces of a vigesimal habit survive in languages that never fully adopted it, French still says quatre-vingts, four twenties, for eighty, and English preserves the score in older usage, most famously the threescore and ten of Psalm 90. The base of twenty most likely reflects counting on fingers and toes together. In the Hebrew Bible twenty is the age of military and census liability, and Jacob serves Laban twenty years for his wives and flocks, a period the narrative marks with some care in Genesis 31. As a number twenty reduces to two, and modern numerology reads it through that pairing.
Balliett's 1908 chart reduces twenty to two, partnership and diplomacy in the standard modern keyword list, the same root this article already notes; Cheiro's 1926 Book of Numbers, Florence Campbell's 1931 book and Juno Jordan's 1965 systematisation all kept that reading rather than developing a distinct compound meaning for twenty the way Cheiro did for numbers such as twenty-seven or forty-three, so the American chart adds comparatively little to the number beyond the arithmetic this article already reports.
Twenty as a Rounded Quantity
Beyond its role as a counting base, twenty functions in scripture and law mostly as a round threshold: the age of accountability, the price in shekels, the span of a notable service. It lacks the dense symbolic freight of twelve or seven, and much of what attaches to it is arithmetical, the product of four and five, the double of ten, rather than mythic. The Maya vigesimal calendar is the great exception, where twenty is genuinely structural, the number of named days whose interlock with the number thirteen generates the two-hundred-and-sixty-day ritual round. Elsewhere twenty is a convenient large-ish round number, the sort reached for when a count is meant to sound substantial without being exact.
The Maya vigesimal calendar already described is not the only base-twenty counting system on record: several West African and Mesoamerican language families independently developed twenty-based counting, generally attributed to the practical habit of counting fingers and toes together, and traces survive well beyond French quatre-vingts, Welsh and Danish both retain vigesimal remnants in their number words for multiples of twenty, a scattered but genuine linguistic fossil of a counting base older than the decimal system that eventually displaced it almost everywhere.
Correspondences & Relations
Numerology Meanings
Born on the twentieth, the root is two and the zero is read as amplifying rather than adding. The gift is sensitivity to other people given greater reach: the same aptitude for partnership as the second of the month, understood by the tradition as operating with more weight and less immediacy.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Disciplines That Use This
The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.
Sources
1. Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras Wrought
Underwood Dudley, Mathematical Association of America (Spectrum series), 1997on the pedigree claimed for modern numerologyView the Source 2. Weisheit und Wissenschaft: Studien zu Pythagoras, Philolaos und Platon (Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism)
Walter Burkert, Harvard University Press, 1962the chapters on Pythagoras and on Pythagorean number theoryView the Source 3. The Hebrew Bible (Tanakh)
4. Skywatchers: A Revised and Updated Version of Skywatchers of Ancient Mexico
Anthony F. Aveni, University of Texas Press, 2001
The Mystery of Numbers
Annemarie Schimmel, Oxford University Press, 1993s.v. twentyView the Source Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.