Numerology Positions
Personality Challenge
Challenge Number
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Origin 1908 to 1965
The difference within the consonant totals of the name, reduced, read as friction in how a person comes across. Like the other name-derived challenges, it is a modern extension rather than part of the inherited technique. The classical Challenge is calculated from the birth date and appears in the 1930s literature in that form; applying the same subtraction to the consonants is a later move made by teaching schools and chart software. Stated plainly: the arithmetic is traditional, the application to the name is not.
Facts
Origins
Origin Period1908 to 1965 1Tradition: Modern name numerology (Mrs. L. Dow Balliett and her successors) Origin PeriodThe numerological chart and its positions were built in the United States between 1908 and the 1960s. Balliett's The Philosophy of Numbers of 1908 supplied the letter-value chart and the first positions; the pinnacles, challenges, cycles and personal-year figures were added by later authors. No position here is attested before the twentieth century. 1 Attributed Author / CompilerMrs. L. Dow Balliett and her successors. The atlas's own sources for these thirty-two positions name four different authors, Balliett in 1908, Cheiro in 1926, Florence Campbell in 1931 and Juno Jordan in 1965, for a scheme presented to readers as one system with one pedigree. The layering is the honest fact about them. 1Tradition: Modern name numerology (Mrs. L. Dow Balliett and her successors) Attributions
CalculationAbsolute difference within the consonant totals, reduced 1 Identity
Number Category Learn More
The Tension in the Outer Self
The Personality Challenge is the challenge number drawn from the Personality total, which is itself the sum of the consonants of the full name, the outer self, the impression a person makes before they are known. Its challenge is the absolute difference within those consonant totals, reduced, and it names the friction in that outward presentation: the gap, in the numerological reading, between the self one shows and the self one is, the recurring difficulty in how a person comes across to others. It is read as an obstacle of persona rather than of substance.
The consonant-only reading behind the Personality total is, like the vowel-only Soul Urge it complements, generally traced to Cheiro's 1926 Book of Numbers rather than to Balliett's original 1908 chart; Juno Jordan's 1965 systematisation is usually credited with turning both figures into a formal, named pair of core numbers and then, by subtraction, into the challenge numbers this article and its Soul Urge Challenge counterpart describe. The sense that a Personality reading captures something specific is also the exact effect the psychologist Bertram Forer demonstrated in 1948: handing identical, deliberately vague personality sketches to thirty-nine students, he found they rated the accuracy of their supposedly individual profile at better than four out of five on average, a result cited as the likely explanation for why a vague outward-persona reading feels tailored to its recipient.
Consonants and the Challenge Method
The division of the name into consonants for the Personality and vowels for the Soul Urge is one of the organising devices of the American system: the vowels are held to voice the inner desire, the consonants to frame the outer show. The Personality Challenge applies the subtraction method to the consonant totals, reading the difference as the tension in the outward self. Like all the challenge numbers it is a modern construction, computed by difference rather than sum, and it rests entirely on the Latin-alphabet spelling of the name, in which the assignment of letters to vowel and consonant is itself not always straightforward, the letter Y in particular is treated now as one, now as the other.
Walter Burkert's study of the Pythagorean tradition finds no ancient precedent for dividing a name into vowels and consonants and reading each half separately; the practice, like the letter-value chart it depends on, belongs entirely to the American numerology assembled after 1900. Underwood Dudley's survey of what such readings are sold for treats the Y-as-vowel-or-consonant ambiguity this article notes as a small but telling sign of a system built by successive writers rather than received whole from any single source.
Correspondences & Relations
Numbers
A zero here means the consonant totals of the name parts matched exactly. The tradition reads this as a challenge with no fixed content rather than no challenge at all: nothing about how one is seen is imposed as a lesson, and whatever discipline applies has to be adopted deliberately. It is a null result within an already derived measure.
A one here names friction in how a person comes across as self-assured: an outward independence that reads as refusal. Because this measure applies birth-date Challenge arithmetic to the consonants, it is a modern extension rather than classical technique, and the older literature calculates nothing of the kind.
A two here names a surface so accommodating that it obscures the person behind it, an outward manner that agrees before it has considered. The friction is between being easy to deal with and being taken seriously. It is a derived figure, used by teaching schools and chart software rather than found in the foundational texts.
A three here names a surface that entertains and thereby deflects, charm operating as a way of not being examined. The difficulty is being liked and not known. As with the other name-derived challenges, the arithmetic is inherited from the birth-date method and its application to the name is a later move.
A four here names a surface that reads as immovable, dependability presenting as inflexibility. The friction is that the same impression which earns trust also excludes a person from anything speculative. It is a derived measure rather than part of the classical system.
A five here names a surface that others cannot rely on reading twice, an impression that changes between meetings. The difficulty is being found interesting and not solid. Like the other name-derived challenges, this figure comes from applying birth-date technique to the consonants and is absent from the older literature.
A six here names a surface that recruits, an outward warmth that collects obligations before the person has agreed to any of them. The friction is between being approachable and being available. It is a modern derivation rather than inherited technique.
A seven here names a surface read as cold when it is only reserved, an impression that repels contact the person may actually want. The difficulty is being misread consistently and in one direction. As a name-derived challenge it is a later extension of the birth-date method rather than classical practice.
An eight here names a surface that provokes, an appearance of authority that draws challenge before anything has been said. The friction is being answered as a rival by people who have not met one. Eight is the largest value this subtraction can yield.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Disciplines That Use This
The chart positions a numerological reading is built from, as distinct from the numbers themselves.
Sources
1. Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras Wrought
Underwood Dudley, Mathematical Association of America (Spectrum series), 1997the chapter on Mrs. L. Dow BalliettView the Source Your Days Are Numbered
Florence Campbell, The Gateway, 1931The Challenge subtractionQuote, The Challenge subtraction
The absolute-difference technique comes from this work as a birth-date calculation; applying it to the consonants of a name is a later development.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.