Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Open Question

Is sainthood a usable cross-cultural category, or does it import Latin Christian assumptions into traditions that do not share them?

Open Question

The comparative literature has not settled this. Using one tradition's word for the others carries with it a juridical, posthumous and universal notion of holiness that the wali, the tzadik, the sant and the arhat do not each share, and specialists in those fields regularly object to the translation. There is no agreed replacement term.

What would resolve this A sustained comparative study working from each tradition's own vocabulary outward rather than from the English word inward, and testing whether any set of features is genuinely shared across them.
OpenComparative religion; religious studiesJohn Bowker (ed.), The Oxford Dictionary of World Religions
Connections

Question On

Source The Oxford Dictionary of World ReligionsJohn Bowker (ed.)
Sources
The Oxford Dictionary of World Religions
John Bowker (ed.), Oxford University Press, 1997s.v. SaintView the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.