Home›Open Questions›What is the thirtieth Ugaritic sign, S2, actually for?Open QuestionsWhat is the thirtieth Ugaritic sign, S2, actually for?Citation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "What is the thirtieth Ugaritic sign, S2, actually for?." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://www.divinityatlas.com/open-questions-index/what-is-the-thirtieth-ugaritic-sign-s2-actually-for.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). What is the thirtieth Ugaritic sign, S2, actually for?. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://www.divinityatlas.com/open-questions-index/what-is-the-thirtieth-ugaritic-sign-s2-actually-forCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-what-is-the-thirtieth-ugaritic-sign-s2-a, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {What is the thirtieth Ugaritic sign, S2, actually for?}, year = {2026}, url = {https://www.divinityatlas.com/open-questions-index/what-is-the-thirtieth-ugaritic-sign-s2-actually-for}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXOpen QuestionCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Open QuestionThe sign appears at the tail of the longer Ugaritic school abecedaries, written a second time after the twenty-ninth sign, and its shape is conventionally described as samekh-like. No Ugaritic source names it, and specialists disagree on its basic function: some read it as an additional native sibilant the ordinary twenty-nine signs did not distinguish, others treat it chiefly as a device for spelling words of foreign origin. No other script modelled in this atlas offers even an approximate cognate to compare it against, unlike Ugaritic's other five signs unique among its Northwest Semitic peers, all five of which correspond cleanly to a preserved Arabic letter.What would resolve this A systematic survey of every attested occurrence of the sign in the Ugaritic textual corpus, not only the abecedaries, checked for whether it clusters in loanwords or foreign personal and place names, which would support the spelling-device reading, against whether it appears in ordinary native vocabulary in a way the standard twenty-nine signs could not otherwise write, which would support a distinct native phoneme.OpenUgaritology; Northwest Semitic historical phonologyPeter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.), The World's Writing SystemsCross-Tradition ConnectionsQuestion OnS2, Alphabet Letters Open question SourcesThe World's Writing Systemstier 1Peter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.), Oxford University Press, 1996View the SourceComments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year