Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Open Questions

Would a radiocarbon assay of the Sudarium of Oviedo on a decontaminated sample give a different age from the seventh century AD result already published?

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Open Question

The published assay came with the laboratory's own caveat that oils absorbed over centuries of veneration could distort the measured age, and that caveat was never tested. No scholar holds a position on what a clean measurement would show, so this is a gap rather than a disagreement: the work was started, it reached no conclusion, and nobody resumed it.

What would resolve this A repeat assay on material cleaned by a published decontamination protocol, run blind across more than one laboratory, with the sampling location on the cloth recorded. Independent characterisation of the absorbed organic contaminants would show how large a shift they are capable of producing, which is the part the original caveat left unquantified.
OpenRadiocarbon dating and archaeometry, with textile conservation science for the decontamination protocol.Mark Guscin, The Oviedo Cloth
Cross-Tradition Connections

Discipline Needed

Source The Oviedo ClothMark Guscin
Source The Oviedo ClothMark Guscin

Question On

Sources
The Oviedo Cloth
Mark Guscin, Lutterworth Press, 1998View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.