Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Open Question

Would the Census of Hallucinations' coincidence rate for crisis apparitions survive a prospective, controlled test rather than retrospective testimony?

Open Question

The 1889-1894 Census of Hallucinations argued that apparitions coinciding with a real death occurred more often than chance, but the finding rests entirely on retrospective self report gathered by volunteers approaching people they knew, against a chance baseline its own authors had to construct. No prospective, controlled test of crisis apparitions has been conducted since.

What would resolve this A prospectively registered study defining in advance what counts as a qualifying apparition and a chance baseline independent of the reporting population, run forward in time rather than reconstructed from memory.
OpenStatistics; survey methodology; history of psychical researchHenry Sidgwick, Eleanor Sidgwick, Frederic W. H. Myers, Frank Podmore, Alice Johnson, Report on the Census of Hallucinations
Connections

Discipline Needed

Source Report on the Census of HallucinationsHenry Sidgwick, Eleanor Sidgwick, Frederic W. H. Myers, Frank Podmore, Alice Johnson
Source Report on the Census of HallucinationsHenry Sidgwick, Eleanor Sidgwick, Frederic W. H. Myers, Frank Podmore, Alice Johnson
Source Report on the Census of HallucinationsHenry Sidgwick, Eleanor Sidgwick, Frederic W. H. Myers, Frank Podmore, Alice Johnson

Question On

Source Report on the Census of HallucinationsHenry Sidgwick, Eleanor Sidgwick, Frederic W. H. Myers, Frank Podmore, Alice Johnson
Sources
Report on the Census of Hallucinations
Henry Sidgwick, Eleanor Sidgwick, Frederic W. H. Myers, Frank Podmore, Alice Johnson, Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research, Vol. X, 1894View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.