Origin 1280 to 1300
Ruach is the middle of the five levels of the soul, from the Hebrew for spirit, wind, or breath. It is the seat of the emotions, of moral awareness, reason, and the ethical will, the part by which a person distinguishes good from evil and exercises character. It is awakened and strengthened as one grows in virtue and understanding. In the sefirotic scheme it is linked here to Tiphareth, the harmonizing center of the Tree, and more broadly to the six emotional Sefirot that surround it.
Facts
Origins
Origin Period1280 to 1300 1Tradition: Zoharic Kabbalah Origin Period600 BCE to 200 BCE 2Tradition: Judaism Origin PeriodAs a Hebrew word, attested in the Hebrew Bible from at least the seventh century BCE; as one of the five graded Kabbalistic soul levels, from the Zohar's emergence in Castile, c. 1280 to 1300 CE. 1 Place of OriginCastile. 1Tradition: Zoharic Kabbalah Attributed Author / CompilerTraditionally Shimon bar Yochai. Critical scholarship since Scholem attributes the Zohar to Moses de Leon and his circle in late-thirteenth-century Castile, and the two attributions are recorded here as the two they are. 1Tradition: Zoharic Kabbalah Origin of the NameThe names are Hebrew common nouns for breath, wind and life, not technical coinages 1Tradition: Zoharic Kabbalah Origin of the NameThe words were already ordinary Hebrew 1Tradition: Zoharic Kabbalah Origin of the NameWhat Kabbalah added was the graded, technical sense 1Tradition: Zoharic Kabbalah LanguageBiblical Hebrew 2Tradition: Judaism LanguageAramaic 3Tradition: Zoharic Kabbalah Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting SourceRuach is wind, breath and spirit; the same word moves over the waters in Genesis 1:2. Kabbalah takes it as the moral and emotional soul, the seat of choice, and holds that it is awakened rather than given. 4Tradition: Zoharic Kabbalah Status
Status TodayLiving tradition, practised today 5 Learn More
Ruach, the Spirit
Ruach is the second level, and the Hebrew word means wind, breath and spirit, the same word used of the ruach elohim moving over the waters in Genesis 1:2. In the Kabbalistic scheme it is the moral and emotional soul, the seat of the impulse toward good and evil and of the capacity for choice, and it is generally said to be awakened rather than given, developing as a person begins to live a moral life. The Zohar and the classical Kabbalistic sources treat the three levels nefesh, ruach and neshamah as the principal scheme, and the medieval sources sometimes correlate them with the tripartite soul of Greek philosophy transmitted through Arabic and Jewish Aristotelianism, which is one of the points where Kabbalah and philosophy touch. Ruach is associated with Yetzirah, the world of formation.
Ruach's placement at Tiphareth, the sefirah read as the tree's own heart, harmonizing the opposed pillars of mercy and severity, is treated by commentators as fitting: the emotional soul is the seat of the middot, the moral and emotional attributes mapped in Kabbalistic ethical literature onto the seven lower sefirot from Chesed to Malkuth, and Tiphareth stands at their center. Later Jewish mourning custom also reflects a popular belief, not confined to Kabbalistic circles, that the soul's levels separate from the body in stages after death, ruach following nefesh; the graduated structure of Jewish mourning observance is often explained with reference to this staged departure, though the custom's roots are wider than any single Kabbalistic text.
Sources The ZoharTraditionally attributed to Moses de Leon with Tanya (Likkutei Amarim)Shneur Zalman of Liady, Major Trends in Jewish MysticismGershom Scholem
Ruach in Jewish Mourning Practice
Jewish mourning custom draws on the layered soul the Kabbalistic sources describe, and Ruach, the moral and emotional soul, is held by some authorities to take longer than Nefesh to settle after death, its departure tied to the resolution of a person's emotional and ethical conduct in life rather than to the body's decay alone. Where Nefesh is bound to appetite, Ruach carries a person's character in the fuller sense, and its state after death is described in some sources as shaped by how that character was lived out, an idea that stands behind the traditional emphasis on eulogy and honest reckoning with a life at a Jewish funeral.
Some later ethical and Hasidic writers describe acts of charity and study undertaken in a deceased relative's name as work that can elevate the departed's Ruach specifically, refining the moral and emotional soul in a way distinct from the more bodily elevation associated with Nefesh.
This practical use, tied to mourning and remembrance, runs alongside Ruach's more abstract place in Kabbalistic cosmology, where it corresponds to the second of the Four Worlds; the funerary application treats a cosmological doctrine as something the living can act on for the sake of the dead, rather than only a description of the soul's structure.
Connections
Associated With
Ruach, the spirit, belongs to Yetzirah, the world of formation, and is the seat of the moral life in this scheme. Not everyone is held to have attained it: the higher parts of the soul are described as acquired through practice rather than possessed at birth.
Source Physician of the Soul, Healer of the Cosmos: Isaac Luria and His Kabbalistic FellowshipLawrence Fine
Belongs to Tradition
Source Major Trends in Jewish MysticismGershom Scholem
In Language
Originates in Language
Source Studies in the ZoharYehuda Liebes
Source The Hebrew Bible (Tanakh)Anonymous (multiple authors)
Related To
Source Major Trends in Jewish MysticismGershom Scholem
Source Major Trends in Jewish MysticismGershom Scholem
Sources
1. Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism
Gershom Scholem, Schocken Books, 1961the doctrine of the soul in the ZoharView the Source 2. The Hebrew Bible (Tanakh)
3. Studies in the Zohar
Yehuda Liebes, State University of New York Press, 1993on the language of the Zohar
4. The Zohar
Traditionally attributed to Moses de Leonthe levels of the soul, ruachView the Source 5. Physician of the Soul, Healer of the Cosmos: Isaac Luria and His Kabbalistic Fellowship
Lawrence Fine, Stanford University Press, 2003on the continuing transmission of Lurianic teachingView the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.