Passages
Tao Te Ching 42
Tao Te Ching
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
The cosmogony of the book, in twelve words of Chinese. 'The Obscurity' and 'the Brightness' are yin and yang; Legge translates rather than transliterates them, and his parenthesis is his own. What the One, the Two and the Three stand for has been disputed since the Han dynasty, and Legge admits in his own note that he does not know.
Facts
Passage
TextThe Tao produced One; One produced Two; Two produced Three; Three produced All things. All things leave behind them the Obscurity (out of which they have come), and go forward to embrace the Brightness (into which they have emerged), while they are harmonised by the Breath of Vacancy. 1 Reference Scheme Translation
TranslationThe Texts of Taoism, Part I (Sacred Books of the East, vol. 39) 1 Learn More
From the Tao to the Ten Thousand Things
Chapter forty two of the Tao Te Ching states the tradition's clearest account of how multiplicity arises from unity. The Tao produces the One, the One produces the Two, the Two produces the Three, and the Three produces the ten thousand things, the text's phrase for everything that exists. Each of the ten thousand things is then said to carry yin on its back and embrace yang in its arms, blending these two forces through moving qi to reach harmony. Commentators across the centuries have read the sequence's middle terms differently. Some identify the Two directly with yin and yang themselves, so the One is undifferentiated unity, the Two is polarity, and the Three is the interaction of yin, yang and the qi that mediates between them. Others read One, Two and Three as stages of increasing differentiation without assigning fixed content to each step, treating the verse as a template for how any complex order unfolds from a single source rather than as a literal list of intermediate beings. What both readings share is the passage's larger claim, that the world's variety is not opposed to the Tao's unity but is its direct and orderly outgrowth, so yin and yang appear in the verse not as a separate doctrine but as the mechanism by which the one Tao becomes the many things.
One Verse, Two Schools of Reading
The earliest surviving copies of the Tao Te Ching complicate any single reading of chapter forty two. Silk manuscripts recovered at Mawangdui in 1973 and bamboo strips recovered at Guodian in 1993 both predate the received text by centuries, and comparing them shows that the chapter's core cosmogonic lines were stable long before any of the standard commentaries that later explained them were written. That stability let two very different schools of reading grow up around the same fixed words. Philosophical commentators, working in something closer to the tradition of Wang Bi, treated the One, Two and Three as a logical account of how differentiation is even possible, closer to metaphysics than to myth. Religious Daoist readers, working within lineages that developed meditation and internal alchemy, treated the same numbers as stages an adept could retrace inward, returning the body's own yin and yang toward the undifferentiated One. The chapter is also a natural point of comparison with other traditions' accounts of how a single origin gives rise to a plural world, since it states the claim in four short steps without invoking any named creator god, ancestor or act of separation, a structure that reads as strikingly abstract next to most creation narratives told as stories about particular gods acting in a particular order.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Concerns
The verse from which the yin-yang cosmogony is drawn.
Passage Of
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.