Practices
Hijama
Therapeutic Practices
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Origin 400 BCE to 700 CE
Wet cupping: drawing blood to the surface with heated or suction cups and then making small superficial incisions so that a quantity of blood is withdrawn. It is practised in Muslim communities as a prophetic recommendation, on the strength of hadith reports in which the Prophet is cupped and commends the procedure, and specific days of the lunar month are named in some reports as preferable.
The practice predates Islam by a long way and belongs to the humoral medicine of the ancient Mediterranean and Near East, where bloodletting was standard across Greek, Roman, Byzantine and Sasanian traditions. Its Islamic profile comes from its inclusion in the genre of prophetic medicine, of which Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya's fourteenth-century compilation is the best known example.
What the tradition claims for it is set out above. This entry makes no claim that the procedure treats, prevents or cures any condition. Clinical evidence for therapeutic benefit is weak, and the procedure carries real risks of infection and scarring where it is performed outside regulated conditions; several health authorities have issued warnings on exactly that ground.
Facts
Status
Status Within the TraditionSourced to the subject's own accountHijama's Islamic profile rests on its inclusion in the genre of prophetic medicine, of which Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya's fourteenth-century compilation is the best known example. 3 Status TodayLiving tradition, practised today 1 Legal StatusSourced to the subject's own accountCambodia's Ministry of Health warned in 2016 that cupping could pose a health risk, particularly for people with high blood pressure or heart conditions, one of the few instances of a national health authority issuing a formal warning specifically naming the practice. 4 Attributions
TraditionSourced to the subject's own accountIslam, a cupping therapy attributed to the practice of the Prophet Muhammad and continued as a form of prophetic medicine. 2 Origins
Origin Period Place of OriginMecca and Medina, Arabia 2 Sourced to the subject's own accountPractised in Muslim communities as a prophetic recommendation, on hadith reports in which the Prophet is cupped and commends the procedure, though the wet cupping technique itself predates Islam and belongs to the wider ancient Mediterranean and Near Eastern medical tradition. Practice
Category of Practice Who Performs ItTrained or authorised specialists 1 Solitary or CommunalPerformed by an officiant for a recipient 1 Scholarship and Forensics
Scholarly NoteSourced to the subject's own accountThe American Cancer Society states that available scientific evidence does not support claims that cupping has any health benefits, and a 2014 review found that positive results reported in earlier studies reflected unreasonable study design and poor research quality rather than a genuine treatment effect. 4 Controversy
Point in DisputeSourced to the subject's own accountClinical evidence for therapeutic benefit is weak, and the procedure carries real risks of infection and scarring where it is performed outside regulated conditions; several health authorities have issued warnings on that ground, a medical assessment distinct from the religious warrant claimed for it. 4 Learn More
Cupping as Prophetic Medicine
Hijama is the practice of "wet cupping," a form of therapy in which small cups are applied to the skin to create suction and, in the wet form, in which shallow scratches are then made so that a small quantity of blood is drawn out into the cups. In the Islamic context hijama is valued as a sunnah practice, part of the "prophetic medicine" derived from reports that the Prophet Muhammad underwent cupping and commended it, and particular days of the lunar month are traditionally held to be especially beneficial for it. It is undertaken by many Muslims both as a remedy for various ailments and as a devotional act of following the Prophet's example, and it has seen a marked revival in recent decades. Cupping itself is far older and more widespread than its Islamic form, practised in ancient Egyptian, Greek and especially Chinese medicine, in which it remains a well-established traditional therapy.
The standing of hijama illustrates the meeting of religious tradition and modern medical evaluation. As a traditional and devotional practice it carries real meaning for its practitioners, and dry cupping is used in some physiotherapeutic settings; but the broad therapeutic claims made for wet cupping, that it removes toxins or "bad blood" and treats a wide range of diseases, are not supported by robust scientific evidence, and reviews of the research generally find the studies to be of low quality and the benefits unproven beyond non-specific effects. There are also real if usually minor safety considerations, since the practice involves breaking the skin and drawing blood, requiring proper hygiene to avoid infection. Hijama thus exemplifies a traditional healing practice sustained by religious sanction and long custom, whose devotional and cultural significance for its practitioners is distinct from the question of its demonstrated medical efficacy.
A Revived Practice Under Modern Regulation
Hijama has undergone a marked revival over the past two decades, moving from a marginal folk practice in many Muslim-majority countries into a licensed and increasingly regulated therapeutic service, a shift driven partly by renewed interest in prophetic medicine and partly by broader global interest in traditional and complementary therapies.
Countries including the United Kingdom, Malaysia and several Gulf states have developed licensing frameworks specifically for cupping practitioners, requiring training in hygiene, sterile equipment and safe technique, a regulatory response to real documented risks: unregulated wet cupping using unsterilised blades or shared equipment has been linked to transmission of bloodborne infections, and health authorities in multiple countries have issued specific warnings about practitioners operating outside licensed or hygienic conditions. Reports attributing specific preferred days of the lunar month, the seventeenth, nineteenth and twenty-first are commonly cited, to the practice have generated their own internal debate among hadith scholars over the reliability and interpretation of the relevant narrations, with some scholars treating the timing as a recommended but non-binding preference and others questioning the strength of the specific reports involved. The revival has also drawn renewed scientific attention, with a growing number of clinical trials attempting to test cupping for pain conditions such as lower back pain, though systematic reviews of this research have generally found the existing trials too small or methodologically weak to establish clear therapeutic benefit, leaving the practice's traditional standing considerably stronger than its current clinical evidence base.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Sources
1. Medieval Islamic Medicine
Peter E. Pormann and Emilie Savage-Smith, Edinburgh University Press, 2007
2. Al-Tibb al-Nabawi (Prophetic Medicine)
Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya, 1350On cupping and the days named for it. Cited for what the tradition claims, not as a medical authority
3. Sahih al-Bukhari
4. Cupping Therapy (Wikipedia)
Wikipedia contributors, Wikipedia, 2026on the American Cancer Society's position and the 2014 review of study qualityView the Source 4. Cupping Therapy (Wikipedia)
Wikipedia contributors, Wikipedia, 2026on Cambodia's 2016 Ministry of Health warningView the Source Encyclopedia of Religion
Mircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.), Macmillan Reference, 2005View the Source Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.