Following the great fire that devastated Rome in July 64 CE, the emperor Nero, unable to dispel rumor that he himself had ordered the blaze, fastened the blame on a group Tacitus records the Roman populace called Chrestians. Those who confessed were arrested first, and on their information a further number was convicted, Tacitus writes, less for the fire itself than for hatred of the human race in general. This is the first recorded instance of the Roman state killing people specifically for being Christian, though its scope was confined to the city of Rome rather than an empire-wide edict of the kind later persecutions under Decius, Valerian and Diocletian would issue.
Facts
The Event
When It HappenedJuly 64 CE, in the immediate aftermath of the fire that burned for nine days and destroyed or badly damaged ten of Rome's fourteen districts; the arrests and executions Tacitus describes followed within the same year, confined to the city of Rome rather than issued as an empire-wide edict. 1 PeriodThe persecution itself was a response to the fire in 64; 68 marks Nero's own death and the end of his reign, after which no further state action against Christians specifically under his name is recorded. Where It HappenedThe city of Rome. Tacitus records no comparable action outside the capital, and the episode is generally read by historians as an act of local scapegoating following the fire rather than a general imperial policy against Christians elsewhere in the empire. 1 Victim GroupChristians resident in the city of Rome, identified through informers after an initial group confessed under arrest; Tacitus gives no count and does not distinguish Roman citizens from others among those punished. 1 Perpetrator RegimeSourced to the subject's own accountThe Roman imperial government under Nero, acting through the ordinary machinery of arrest and public execution rather than through any surviving formal edict naming Christians as a class; a minority of scholars have proposed a since-lost institutum Neronianum, a formal legal ruling against the group, but no ancient writer besides Tertullian, over a century later, refers to such a measure. 2 Status
Official RecognitionNot formally recognized by any body 1 Recognition BasisNo modern state or international body issues recognition determinations for events of antiquity; the persecution is documented and named by ancient and modern historians rather than formally recognized by any contemporary institution, and it is commemorated liturgically within Christian tradition rather than through any secular process. 1 Origins
Defining MomentTacitus records that those convicted were killed with deliberate theatrical cruelty: some were sewn into the skins of wild animals and torn apart by dogs, others crucified, and others set alight to serve as torches after dark in Nero's own gardens, where the emperor is said to have mixed with the crowd watching or driven a chariot among them dressed as a charioteer. Tacitus notes that even a hardened Roman public began to pity the victims, sensing they were being destroyed not for the public good but to satisfy one man's cruelty. 1 Scholarship
Where It Is RecordedSourced to the subject's own accountTacitus's Annals 15.44, written around 116 CE, roughly fifty years after the event, is the near-sole near-contemporary source and carries its own well-documented interpretive problems. The passage survives in a single medieval manuscript tradition, the Second Medicean, which gives the group's name as the garbled "Chrestianos" rather than "Christianos"; most textual scholars read this as authentic evidence of confusion over the name circulating in Rome's population at the time, rather than as a sign of later Christian tampering with the text. Tacitus's own phrase for the scale, "multitudo ingens", an immense multitude, is a rhetorical description rather than a count, and the passage's precise meaning, whether Nero prosecuted Christians specifically for arson or for the wider "hatred of the human race" charge already associated with the group, remains debated. The great majority of historians accept the persecution's basic historicity; a minority, including Brent Shaw, have argued the passage should be read with more skepticism than it traditionally receives. 2 Consequences
What It SettledA wave of arrests, informer-driven convictions and public executions confined to Rome and to the year 64, ending with no recorded formal policy left in place; Christianity continued to spread through the empire in the following decades with no comparable state action recorded again until the Domitianic era, itself a much more doubtful episode, and then not on an empire-wide scale until Decius in 250. 1 Disputed
Lasting ConsequenceChristian tradition, first attested in sources later than Tacitus himself, holds that the apostles Peter and Paul both died in Rome during Nero's reign, Peter by crucifixion and, by a later legend, upside down at his own request, and Paul by beheading, a method reserved for Roman citizens. Neither Tacitus nor any other near-contemporary source names them among the fire-related victims; the tradition rests on later Christian testimony, including the late first century Epistle of Clement's reference to persecution under Nero, rather than on the primary account of the fire itself. 2 Sourced to the subject's own accountRecorded as church tradition rather than as an attested historical fact: Tacitus's own account of 64 names no individual victims, and the specific claim that Peter and Paul died in this persecution first appears in Christian sources written after Tacitus, not in the near-contemporary record. Open Questions
Death Toll AssessmentTacitus's own "multitudo ingens", an immense multitude, is a rhetorical characterization of scale, not a number, and no other near-contemporary ancient source gives one. Jerome, writing a chronicle around the 390s CE, over three centuries after the event, gives a figure of 979 deaths, a late Christian tradition too far removed from the event to be treated as a count rather than a later estimate, so this atlas records the toll as unknown rather than adopting it.
Unlike a persecution with a disputed ancient total to weigh, this one has no ancient numerical claim at all from a near-contemporary source, only a later and undated tradition; the gap is a genuine silence in the near-contemporary record. Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
Paul the Apostle, Figures Why this is disputed. Christian tradition holds that Paul was beheaded in Rome under Nero, a method reserved for Roman citizens; Tacitus's own account of the fire names no individual victims, so this is recorded as tradition rather than as part of his near-contemporary report.
Simon Peter, Figures Why this is disputed. Christian tradition holds that Peter was martyred in Rome under Nero, crucified and, by a later legend, upside down at his own request; Tacitus's own account of the fire names no individual victims, so this is recorded as tradition rather than as part of his near-contemporary report.
Conducted By
Nero, whose blaming of the Christians and orchestration of their public executions Tacitus records directly.
Persecuted Group
Sources
Open Questions (1 open question)
What Was the True Death Toll of the Neronian Persecution?
Tacitus, writing roughly fifty years after the event and the near-sole near-contemporary source, describes an "immense multitude" convicted without giving any number, and no other source from within a century of the fire supplies one; the 979 figure sometimes quoted traces to Jerome's chronicle of the 390s CE, over three centuries later.
What would resolve this No further ancient source is likely to surface at this distance; a systematic review of the archaeological and epigraphic record for first century Roman burial or execution sites tied to this specific episode could at best establish a documented floor rather than a true total.
Roman imperial history; early Christian source criticismPublius Cornelius Tacitus, Tacitus, Annals, Book XV
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.