Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Religious Legal Instruments

The Eight Garudhammas

Vinaya Rulings

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The eight rules of respect said to have been imposed as the condition of admitting women to the Buddhist order, which subordinate the nuns' community to the monks' community and whose authenticity is disputed.

Facts
Open Questions
Origin Period
from 500 BCE 1
Tradition places the rules at the founding of the bhikkhuni order during the Buddha's own ministry, but the Buddha's dates are themselves unsettled and no source assigns the rules a specific year within his ministry. 500 BCE, matching this atlas's own recorded uncertainty about the Buddha's dates, is recorded here only as a rough placeholder, not as a settled date.
Attributed Author / Compiler
Several of the eight rules presuppose an order of nuns that already exists and has its own procedure, which they cannot have had at the moment of foundation. The sixth requires ordination from both communities, impossible for the first generation and contradicted within the same collections. Six of the eight appear elsewhere in the discipline as ordinary rules, each with its own account of the incident that occasioned it, and the Pali, Chinese and Tibetan recensions differ in wording and order.
Comparative work across the surviving recensions, including those preserved only in Chinese and Tibetan translation, has been carried a long way by Bhikkhu Analayo and Ute Husken, but the field has not converged on which items are stable across lineages that separated early.
Disputed
Current Status
In force where the order of nuns exists. Their authenticity is disputed: several rules presuppose an established order at the moment of its founding, six appear elsewhere in the discipline with their own origin stories, and the recensions differ. 1
Origins
Language of Composition
Pali, with Chinese and Tibetan recensions that differ in wording and order 1
Learn More
The Eight Rules

The account appears in the disciplinary collections of several schools and its shape is the same in each. Mahapajapati Gotami, the Buddha's foster mother, asks for the admission of women to the homeless life. She is refused, asks again, and is refused again. She and a company of women cut their hair, put on ochre robes and follow on foot to where the Buddha is staying. Ananda intercedes, asks whether a woman who goes forth is capable of the fruits of the path, and receives the answer that she is. The admission is then granted on condition that eight rules of respect be accepted for life.

The eight are structural rather than moral. A nun ordained a hundred years must rise, bow and pay respect to a monk ordained that day. Nuns must not spend the rains retreat in a place where no monks are available. Twice a month they must ask the monks' community for the observance day and request an exhortation. At the end of the rains the invitation to be admonished must be made before both communities. A nun who has committed a grave offence must undergo the period of discipline before both communities. Ordination must be sought from both communities. A nun may never abuse or revile a monk. And nuns may not admonish monks, while monks may admonish nuns.

The same account has the Buddha add a prediction that the true teaching will now last five hundred years rather than a thousand.

The Argument About Authenticity

Few passages in the canon have been examined as closely, and the difficulties are internal to the texts rather than imported from outside them.

Several of the eight presuppose an order of nuns that already exists. A rule directing where nuns spend the rains, or requiring a formal request for exhortation, or governing the discipline of a nun who has committed a grave offence, describes an established institution with its own procedure. Imposed at the moment of foundation, before a single woman has been ordained, they have nothing to operate on. The sixth is harder still: it requires ordination from both communities, which is impossible for the first generation and is contradicted a few pages later in the same collections, where the Buddha authorises monks to ordain nuns.

Second, six of the eight appear elsewhere in the disciplinary collections as ordinary rules, each with its own origin story describing the incident that occasioned it. A rule cannot both have been laid down at the founding and have arisen later from a specific incident.

Third, the recensions differ. The Pali, Chinese and Tibetan versions vary in wording, in order and in the number of items treated as fundamental.

Bhikkhu Analayo, working across the recensions, has argued that the account is a later composition. Ute Husken reached comparable conclusions from the Pali alone. The rules remain in force where the nuns' order exists, and the scholarship has become part of the argument about reviving full ordination for women in traditions where the lineage lapsed.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Buddhism, Religions

The eight rules of respect said to condition the admission of women to the Buddhist order.

Source The Foundation History of the Nuns' OrderBhikkhu Analayo

Belongs to Tradition

Buddhism, Religions
Source The Foundation History of the Nuns' OrderBhikkhu Analayo

Element Of

Theravada, Denominations

The eight rules subordinating the order of nuns to the order of monks are transmitted in the discipline, and their attribution to the Buddha is argued over within the tradition and outside it alike.

Source The Princeton Dictionary of BuddhismRobert E. Buswell Jr. and Donald S. Lopez Jr.
Sources
1. The Foundation History of the Nuns' Order
Bhikkhu Analayo, Hamburg Buddhist Studies, projekt verlag, 2016
Dignity and Discipline: Reviving Full Ordination for Buddhist Nuns
Thea Mohr and Jampa Tsedroen (eds.), Wisdom Publications, 2010View the Source
Open Questions (1 open question)
Were the eight rules of respect laid down at the founding of the order of nuns, or composed later?

Several of the eight presuppose an order of nuns that already exists and has its own procedure, which they cannot have had at the moment of foundation. The sixth requires ordination from both communities, which is impossible for the first generation and is contradicted within the same collections. Six of the eight appear elsewhere in the discipline as ordinary rules, each with its own account of the incident that occasioned it. The Pali, Chinese and Tibetan recensions differ in wording and in order. Tradition places the rules at the founding of the bhikkhuni order during the Buddha's own ministry, but the Buddha's own dates are themselves unsettled and no source assigns the rules a specific year within it.

What would resolve this Comparative work across all surviving recensions of the foundation account, including those preserved only in Chinese and Tibetan translation, with attention to which items are stable across lineages that separated early. Bhikkhu Analayo and Ute Husken have carried this a long way and the field has not converged. Independently, a firmer scholarly resolution of the Buddha's own chronology, or textual evidence dating the rules apart from the ordination narrative that carries them, would settle the date even where the recension question remains open.
Buddhist studies; Pali, Chinese and Tibetan vinaya philologyBhikkhu Analayo, The Foundation History of the Nuns' Order
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.