Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Religious Movements

Fundamentalist Movement

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin 1910 to 1925

The Fundamentalist movement is an early twentieth century American Protestant movement defending a set of core doctrines, biblical inerrancy foremost among them, against theological liberalism and against Darwinian evolution taught as settled fact. It takes its name from The Fundamentals, a series of pamphlets published from 1910 to 1915 defining the doctrines its contributors held to be non-negotiable, and drew nationwide attention through the 1925 Scopes Trial in Dayton, Tennessee, where a high school teacher was prosecuted for teaching evolution in violation of state law. The trial's outcome and its portrayal in the national press are widely treated by historians as the moment fundamentalism's public reputation shifted from a serious theological position to a target of ridicule, even though the movement itself continued and later split into a distinct evangelical wing from the mid-twentieth century onward.

Facts
Origins
Origin Period
1910 to 1925 1
Origin Period
From the 1910 to 1915 publication of The Fundamentals pamphlets to the 1925 Scopes Trial, the movement's most widely publicized moment. 1
Place of Origin
United States 1
Founder
No single founder; named for The Fundamentals, a series of pamphlets published 1910 to 1915 defining the movement's core doctrinal commitments. 1
Status
Status Today
Living tradition, practised today 1
Belief
Defining Doctrinal Position
Trinitarian: one God in three persons 1
Doctrinal Position Detail
Centred on biblical inerrancy and a defined list of core doctrines drawn from The Fundamentals, defended against theological liberalism and against Darwinian evolution taught as settled fact. 1
Sacraments or Ordinances
Varies among its participating denominations; the movement's own distinctiveness is doctrinal, biblical inerrancy chief among its named fundamentals, rather than sacramental. 1
Practice
Baptism
Varies among its participating denominations; no single fundamentalist baptismal practice. 1
Liturgical Language
The vernacular 1
Attributions
Church Family
Not a single denomination; a trans-denominational movement within American Protestantism, later giving rise to a distinct evangelical movement that partly distinguished itself from fundamentalism's separatist stance. 1
History
Separation or Divergence
Produced a lasting split within American Protestantism between fundamentalist and modernist or liberal wings, most visibly within Northern Presbyterian and Baptist denominations during the 1920s and 1930s. 1
Organisation
Governance
No central authority 1
Ordination
Varies between provinces or member bodies 1
Learn More
Ninety Pamphlets and a Word They Did Not Choose Lightly

Between 1910 and 1915, two wealthy laymen funded the publication and free distribution of a series of twelve volumes, later collected as ninety essays, titled The Fundamentals: A Testimony to the Truth, written by a range of conservative Protestant scholars and pastors to defend what its editors judged the non-negotiable core of Christian belief against what they saw as the corrosive influence of theological liberalism and higher biblical criticism. Contributors defended doctrines including the inerrancy of Scripture, the virgin birth, Christ's substitutionary atonement, his bodily resurrection, and the historical reality of his miracles, framing each as a fundamental a genuine Christian could not discard without abandoning the faith itself.

The movement that took its name from these pamphlets was not, at the outset, primarily organized around opposing evolution; that fight came later and somewhat overshadowed the broader doctrinal project in public memory. What The Fundamentals actually represented was an attempt by conservative Protestants across denominational lines, Presbyterian, Baptist and others, to draw a clear line around what they considered essential Christian doctrine at a moment when they perceived seminaries, mainline pulpits and popular culture alike drifting toward a more historically and scientifically accommodating Christianity they believed had abandoned the faith's actual content while keeping its vocabulary.

A Courtroom in Dayton, and a Reputation That Did Not Recover Quickly

In 1925, Tennessee passed a law forbidding public school teachers from teaching any theory denying the biblical account of human creation in favor of a theory that man descended from a lower order of animals, and the American Civil Liberties Union, looking for a test case, recruited a Dayton high school teacher named John Scopes to be prosecuted for violating it. The resulting trial drew two of the era's most famous public figures as opposing counsel, the three-time presidential candidate and fundamentalist champion William Jennings Bryan for the prosecution and the celebrated defense attorney Clarence Darrow for the defense, and national press coverage that turned a local law enforcement matter into a spectacle followed across the country.

Scopes was convicted, a verdict later overturned on a technicality, so the trial settled nothing legally, but its cultural verdict landed far more decisively against the fundamentalist side. Darrow's cross-examination of Bryan himself, called as a witness on the literal accuracy of the Bible, was widely reported as having left Bryan flustered and the fundamentalist position looking anti-intellectual and provincial, an image cemented by H. L. Mencken's scathing newspaper coverage and, decades later, by the fictionalized 1955 play and 1960 film Inherit the Wind. Historians studying the movement generally agree the trial did not end fundamentalism, which continued building institutions, Bible colleges and denominations largely outside national media attention, but it did mark the point at which fundamentalist Christianity lost the broader cultural argument in the eyes of the American press and much of educated public opinion for a generation.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Belongs to Tradition

Sources
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.