Assigning a distinct meaning to every one of the 360 degrees is a much older habit than the Sabian set. Vettius Valens, writing in Greek in the second century, divided each sign into three ten degree faces and gave each a planetary ruler in a fixed rotation, the scheme this atlas still uses for the decan recorded at this degree.
Ptolemy, in the Tetrabiblos, recorded a separate table of unequal five planet subdivisions called bounds, the ancestor of the term ruler recorded here. Neither writer attached a picture to a degree, only a planet. That step, a specific image for every one of the 360, first appears complete in 1494, in Johannes Angelus's Astrolabium Planum, a Latin work whose images are unambiguously public domain but whose usable English is not, since no old translation is free of its own copyright.
The next complete set was Welsh astrologer John Thomas, writing as Charubel, whose 1898 book The Degrees of the Zodiac Symbolised describes this degree as a man ploughing in the midst of a boundless plain, an image of patient, repetitive labor breaking new ground, well suited to the very first degree of the zodiac. Only after that, in 1925, did Marc Edmund Jones and the clairvoyant Elsie Wheeler produce the images now generally read through Dane Rudhyar's 1973 restatement.
In practice, astrologers who use degree symbols mostly do it two ways, reading the degree a natal placement or a progressed Sun or Moon occupies, or checking whether two people's charts share a degree closely enough to be notable in synastry. Neither use belongs to classical technique; it is a twentieth century addition laid over the older, planet only decan and bound system these same degrees already carried.